Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 20 Nov 2005 (Sunday) 23:36
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Why did you choose to go with Canon?"
Them big white lenses
56
10.8%
Choice of lenses
206
39.7%
Choice of bodies
93
17.9%
Marketing and promotional material
25
4.8%
A voice in the night whispered "Canon"
139
26.8%

519 voters, 519 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Why did you choose Canon?

 
abjam77
Member
Avatar
129 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
     
May 23, 2012 13:15 |  #166

Higher quality used bodies available for cheap compared to Nikon. I'm thinking 20D, 30D, and 5D.


Portfolio (external link) : Blog (external link)
Canon 5D | Tamon 17-35 | Tamron 28-75 2.8 | Tamron 70-300 VC | Canon 50mm 1.8 | Canon 85mm 1.8 | Canon 430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
totetite
Member
30 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
May 23, 2012 13:21 |  #167

i took a nikon 3ds once, and suddenly after taking some shots ... *in a whisper voice* ... "i see dead pixel"

went canon and never looked back since :)


[5D3: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II] [Rebel XTi: EF-S 60mm, EF 28-135mm]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maximus_73
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2012
     
May 23, 2012 13:37 |  #168

because Nikon sucks! :D

several years ago, I was looking both cameras Nikon and Canon. I checked the price of lenses from Nikon, and generally a bit more expensive comparing to Canon, and this was a main reason why I chose Canon. But boy...I was wrong now, seems like Canon is more expensive now - look at 5D mk3 and D800.


Cameras: Canon EOS M, FujiFilm X-T1| Lenses: FD 50mm 1.4, Fujinon 23mm 1.4, Fujinon 56 1.2, Zeiss 32mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WRXTACY
Senior Member
Avatar
763 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Fredericksburg , VA, USA
     
May 23, 2012 15:51 |  #169

I liked the rebel XT better then the Nikon what the hell was it back then a D40?

I hate the D40. I worked at best buy in the camera dept at the time so I got to mess with each one A LOT. And I just loved the menu system and the controls of the Canon.


-Brandon-
Canon 5D Mark 2 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 L | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L | Canon EF 24-105 f/4 IS L
Full Gear List | My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,376 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6394
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 23, 2012 16:00 |  #170

canon was better at the time + family members had canon, so borrowing lenses was really helpful. I've been using borrowed stuff for years with my brother losing interest in photography for the time. I'm sure he'll go back to it after he's done with school.


Sony A7riii/A9 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mileslong24
Senior Member
508 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jun 2011
     
May 23, 2012 16:04 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #171

Because I had it narrowed down to a Canon and Nikon and when I went into the store, the Canon felt better in my hand. The rest is history.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shoshone
Senior Member
Avatar
504 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 257
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Somerset, England
     
May 24, 2012 11:33 |  #172

Only Canon at the time I was looking for a FF body made one 5Dc. In those days Nikon were pouring scorn on why anyone would want full frame - funny the turnabout they took duh!


Sony: A7rii
FE16-35ZA | FE 55 | B85
WebSite: (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StarBlazer
Member
83 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Sardinia, Italy
     
May 24, 2012 13:00 as a reply to  @ post 939730 |  #173

Let's say choice of bodies. It was between the eos 650 and the Minolta 5000. Canon had a deal on the body with the 50 f1.8 & 70-210 f4. All 3 still work after 25 years.


EOS 7D | EOS 350d | EF-S 10-22mm | EF-S 18-135mm IS | EF 70-210 f/4 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | EF 50mm f/1.8 MKI | EF 100mm Macro f/2.8L IS | Σ 2x APO EX DG TC |
Celestron C9.25 | Vixen Sphinx SXD

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muteki
Member
200 posts
Likes: 67
Joined Jul 2009
     
May 24, 2012 13:53 |  #174

Few years ago, when I bought my XSi, it had better ISO 1600 than any of the Nikon bodes of the same class. Then I switched to 7D, and Nikon, even now, didn't have a body that's comparable to the 7D, but their D300s was close though. I like Canon's menu system and have never liked the Nikon's menu. Now I wish that Canon would improve in the high ISO department in their future bodies.


Raymond

Gears| (external link)Flickr |  (external link)5∞px (external link)|  (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crimsonblack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,052 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
     
Jun 01, 2012 18:23 |  #175

I was a Nikon guy from way back. When I bought the sony f717 I was a gonna be a sony guy. Like the product emmensely. When I could get a digital I looked most at the Nikon, the D70 was the hot commodity, the D80 was... it was my choice but financials ended up keeping me with the Sony. I started reading up, comparing and checking out the lenses. I really like the lens selection. But it was the Camera bodies that sent me over to Canon. I liked the feel and look of the Camera in my hand over the Nikon bodies. The guts and what Canon was doing with their stuff was awesome. They were upgrading their bodies faster than Nikon, higher pixels and the AF systems were getting better and the 50D was gonna be mine. I couldn't afford the 7D. Luckily a 7D was gifted to me and I nearly dropped a load in the shorts. I feel I made the right choice for me. I have seen nothing from Nikon that has changed my mind or made me feel like I should have considered the other direction.

I am a poor fellow right now, but I have gotten another lens, a grip and a super cheap flash (for now). I am a happy camper and jealous of all you ladies and gents with the great lenses and equipment. But I'm workin' on it.


| 7D Gripped | 28-135 f/3.5-4.6 | 50 f/1.8 || --- Sony F717 digital (infrared) --- Bunch of Film Stuff:- | Nikon & Nikkormat | 50/28/70-150/400 | B & J 4x5 large format | Mamiya C220 |
BurntEffects.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
criTalon
Member
Avatar
40 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: SoCal
     
Jun 01, 2012 18:27 |  #176

None of the above polls! When I first started in photography, I got Canon because my friend went Nikon and didn't want to "copy" him. And now he's a Canon dude too.


"I've found there's a fine line to chasing a dream and being a bum...but along the way, it's always an adventure - life is what you make it" - Lindsey Stirling
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
URLphotographer
Member
143 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jun 01, 2012 18:33 |  #177

It was the lenses for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sharpstat
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Pasadena,CA.U.S.A.
     
Jun 01, 2012 18:42 |  #178

Dan S wrote in post #939519 (external link)
years ago I purchased a AE-1 program. I really liked the qualities that it possessed such as you can choose your shutter speed and it will pick the corresponding aperature or you can pick the arperature and it will pick the correct shutter. or you could shoot it full manual or total automatic. Imagine that 4 different ways. I thought this was just too good to be true.

my first digital was a Sony FD-97 that utilized floppies. Kind of a good idea except for floppies will a lot of times malfunction. And I could not have interchangeable lenses.

About a year in half ago I decided to do some searching to see if there was a camera out there that had the amenities of the AE-1 program. After doing a lot of reading I found out that the rebel did everything except used a memory card instead of film.

this was the 300d and I was totally happy. Now I am upgrading to the XT which should be arriving any day.....Dan

I ended up being a convert the same way. I had used Olympus and Pentax, and wanted to try something else. It made it easier when I decided to upgrade from the AE-1 program as I already had Canon mount lenses. I then went from a 30D to a 1D MKIIN and never looked at another brand. I have used Nikon and like them but to start over now is crazy and expensive!


V.Sharp
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fodowsky
Senior Member
Avatar
590 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jun 01, 2012 19:13 |  #179

I chose Canon because the Rebel was an option with Amex points! I stayed because once I had a little more than a clue about how to use it, the lenses won me over... especially the 85L.


Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeinctown
Goldmember
2,119 posts
Likes: 233
Joined May 2012
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jun 01, 2012 19:31 |  #180

Several for me...
Was told by several other photographers that dollar for dollar the Canon lenses will be better. Whether or not this is true I have no clue. I do know there are a ton of them out there and you can find them used all over.
Price for what I got
The body was larger and felt better in my hands. If it was uncomfortable, how much would I want to use it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

22,116 views & 0 likes for this thread
Why did you choose Canon?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is shuadchaun
981 guests, 309 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.