Had the 60D for a while now and pretty much now it inside out. For the past 6 months I have been doing a reasoanable amount of paid work. Some evening events but mainly sports, photographing runners in races etc. I have been very happy with the 60D but maybe now is the time to go full frame.
I guess I'm looking for someone to tell me that dumping a lot of cash on the Mark III is worthwhile. I hear the AF system will be better for tracking and maybe better image quality overall ?
I have the 24-105L & 70-200 F2.8II and was looking to buy the 16-35 II soon also.
It seems much easier spending money on L glass than buying bodies, I just can't decide !