Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 09 Jun 2012 (Saturday) 09:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Full Frame owners, how did you choose your general purpose zoom?

 
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:49 |  #16

PFDarkside wrote in post #14554387 (external link)
It's a classic question....

-24-70mm L
-24-105mm L

I am a brand new 5D2 owner (thanks to Randy98mtu!) and I need a lens for it.... It seems like the two above lenses are the classic general purpose zooms to pair with a 5D2. I know the technical specs of each, and I can relate the field of view of each to my experiences with my Rebel and kit lens. The shallow DOF available with each is a little more difficult to wrap my head around, as the 18-55mm doesn't have much going for it in the "shallow DOF" department, although I do have the 50mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.8 to get a little perspective. However, I'm having trouble weighing the 105mm range and IS against the f/2.8.

Basically, what made you choose one over the other for your full frame DSLR?


I've never used a full frame standard zoom lens, and after getting my 50L, I have no desire to.


All 50mm lenses sing on 35mm format!


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,148 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 230
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan
     
Jun 09, 2012 12:50 |  #17

When I shot with crop bodies, I used a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens. For the past couple of years, I found I was using that lens mostly outdoors after adding a 28mm f/1.8 prime for indoor use, so I rarely needed the faster f/2.8 aperture.

So, when I bought the 5D3, I decided I would rather have the added focal range, lighter weight and IS over the faster aperture for my walk around zoom. The 50mm f/1.4 replaces the 28mm as my standard indoor lens now. Also, the price of the 24-105L is very attractive when buying it as part of the 5D3 kit. I sold my 17-55mm f/2.8 for about the same price as the 24-105L.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maximus_73
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2012
     
Jun 09, 2012 13:04 |  #18

when I got 5D mrkII, I was debating should I keep 24-105 or upgrade to 24-70 - although IS addresses the low light issue but there is a few thing that made me to upgrade to 24-70:
1. extra stop
2. I like bokeh

beside back then in term of price, the 24-105 and 24-70 were $250.00 different, but now 24-105 would be a bargain for you comparing insanely inflated price for 24-70.


Cameras: Canon EOS M, FujiFilm X-T1| Lenses: FD 50mm 1.4, Fujinon 23mm 1.4, Fujinon 56 1.2, Zeiss 32mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
Avatar
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jun 09, 2012 14:44 |  #19

I wanted the extra stop and IS does't help much when shutter speed is 1/60 or faster. 24-70 was the choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,592 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jun 09, 2012 14:52 |  #20

Well, my general purpose zoom came with the package for operating the camera, also called a human body, and more specifically, my own body :D. The parts used most for "zooming", although technically it really is getting closer or further away while changing perspective as well as framing, is my legs, although occasionally I use other body parts too to achieve this.

Oh, and in order to record whatever I have "zoomed" into or out of, the general purpose lens I apply with this general purpose "zoom", is a 50L :D.

On a more serious note: I have shot both 24-105L IS and 24-70L, but I am much more comfortable with a prime around 50 mm, preferably a fast one, hence my choice. It is my go-to lens, and is mounted by default on my 5D II.

Kind regards, Wim


5D Mk II & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & a solitary zoom, OM-D E-M1 Mk II, Pen-F & Panasonic GM5 with 11 primes, 8 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,427 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 257
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Jun 09, 2012 14:53 as a reply to  @ post 14555138 |  #21

For me it must be fast and non-expensive because I'm not zoom defendant anymore as I used to. 28-75 and no plans to upgrade. It does the job as general zoom lens really well.


Old Site (external link). M-E and ME blog (external link). Film Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skul
Member
92 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2011
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 10, 2012 11:26 |  #22

garbidz wrote in post #14554845 (external link)
YO, Skul, it seems they got the focusing finally right with the 5D II.
Instead of upgrading, I'll get a ticket to Namibia or Borneo or something with a 'z' in its name like Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan or Zaire...

Is my memory playing tricks with me or were there some quality issues with the early releases of the 24-105?

(from wiki: Some early production models of the lens had a flare problem (reportedly the first 10,000 batch) and Canon offered to repair them for free)

Sorry, I never heard of the problem. I've had mine about three years, and wouldn't trade it for anything. Have a good time at your "Z" destination.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sol95
Senior Member
661 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jun 10, 2012 11:31 |  #23

i tried both, and they both have their merits. in my use, i preferred the 24-70L over the 24-105L. But I realised i shot mostly at the 24mm mark or the 50mm mark with my 24-70L.

So i took the plunge and got rid of the 24-70L, didn't replace it with any other standard zoom, and make do with the 50L, 24LII, and if I want a bit of flexibility, the 17-40L.

for me, i don't miss the zoom in this range at all.


Bodies: 5D mk III
Lenses: 50 f/1.2L | 85 f/1.2L II | 100 f/2.8L IS Macro | 17-40 f/4.0L | 24-70 f/2.8L II | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II
Accessories: 430EX II | TC-80N3 M43: Olympus E-PM1 | Olympus m.Zuiko 14-42 II R | Panasonic 14 f/2.5 | Panasonic 20 f/1.8 | Olympus m.Zuiko 45 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Jun 10, 2012 12:40 |  #24

For most people it will come down to their preference for IS and a bit more reach over a max. aperture of f/2.8


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
facedodge
Goldmember
Avatar
1,192 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Silver Spring, MD (DC Suburb)
     
Jun 10, 2012 14:00 |  #25

The IS on the 24 -105 is most useful for video for me. It really allows you to go hand held or use a not so smooth tripod.


Gear List | Feedback | facebook (external link) | [URL="http://www.flick​r.com/photos/wmcy2/"]flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twoshadows
Liquid Nitrogen
Avatar
6,535 posts
Gallery: 53 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1452
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Asked to leave Paradise...
     
Jun 10, 2012 14:50 |  #26

For general purpose I wouldn't spend the money on an L lens. I would get a 28-135 IS, which is more than adequate for general stuff and put the money saved into a more specialized lens, like a fast 50 or an UWA.


xgender.net (external link) Miss Olivia "OA" Grey - please refer to me as she/her/Miss
Nikkor 28/2, 35/2.8-PC 55/1.2, 55/3.5 - Voigtländer 50/2.8 - Tamron SP 28-80, SP 60-300, SP 300/5.6 - Pentax SMC Takumar 135/2.5, 200/4 - Lensbaby Composer Pro II w/Sweet35mm & Edge50mm | Canon 5DII | Sigma 12-24 - Canon 28-105 II, 85/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattD
Senior Member
Avatar
944 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Norwich UK
     
Jun 10, 2012 14:51 |  #27

iv not owned the 24-70 (I have used it and I liked it a lot)

I used to own the 24-105 and I just never used it, I found it boring (probably more a criticism of me than the lens though)


Flickr (external link).
500PX (external link)
Twitter (external link)
Tumblr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JersFocus
Senior Member
Avatar
572 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Same pale blue dot as you.
     
Jun 10, 2012 15:21 |  #28

I went with 24-105 AND Tamron 28-75. Best of both worlds for the price of a new 24-105.


Gear & Feedback
Go Oilers!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpedraza
Member
37 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Rocky River
     
Jun 10, 2012 15:35 |  #29

well if it were me i'd go 24-70. I never been much of a fan of the 24-105


Canon 1ds mII : Zeiss 28mm - Canon EF 24mm - Canon 35mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaapu
Member
71 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Finland, Lapland
     
Jun 10, 2012 16:25 |  #30

I just bought 24-105 and I've been using it with 7D. Such an awesome lens. I'm hopeful it will become my general lens with 5D3 which I will get in these days. Size, weight, FR, IS.
If I find that I need f2.8 I'll buy Tamron 24-70mm.
Edit: Almost forgot that it takes 77mm filters as most of my lenses.


http://juhakauppinen.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,344 views & 0 likes for this thread
Full Frame owners, how did you choose your general purpose zoom?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is OletaJackson
830 guests, 271 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.