Got the answer, thanks.
thedcmule2 Goldmember 1,125 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Jun 14, 2012 01:01 | #1 Got the answer, thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stanclark Goldmember  1,143 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Windsor,California More info | Jun 14, 2012 01:40 | #3 yes! So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tupper Tupperware Party Sheep  2,432 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sydney More info | Jun 14, 2012 01:43 | #4 No. With that framing, taking the bush away would still look like unusual composition to me. Different framing would have made it better IMO Ewan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SAB_Click Senior Member  443 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Yes!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend.  66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Jun 14, 2012 01:53 | #6 I think that one is destined to the history folder. Don't see anything compelling in that shot. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stanclark Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Windsor,California More info | Jun 14, 2012 02:15 | #7 Sometimes you have to throw a shot away....rethink your approach to this shot...go around the bush, climb through the bush, hack it out of the way.....cross the bridge shoot from the other side...ect So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dynamitetony Goldmember  1,023 posts Likes: 30 Joined Sep 2007 Location: london UK More info | Jun 14, 2012 02:18 | #8 yes 5Dmk4 : 5Dmk3: Sigma 24mm F1.4 :Sigma 35mm F1.4 : Canon 50mm F1.4 : Canon 85mm F1.8 : Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro : Canon 24-105 F4 : Canon 70-200 F2.8L mkii : Flashes, lights & Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2012 02:38 | #9 Got it, will reshoot when I get a chance. Thanks for the advice!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jun 14, 2012 08:00 | #10 |
Jun 14, 2012 14:21 | #11 Numenorean wrote in post #14577537  Nope I think that photo ruins that photo. What do you mean? Can you at least be constructive?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin  44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | The photo itself is very harsh on the lighting side, perspective is not working, the bush is so not the ruination of this one, sorry.Time of day, composition, focus, they are all working against you. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jun 14, 2012 15:34 | #13 thedcmule2 wrote in post #14579342 What do you mean? Can you at least be constructive? Without the bush you would have half of a photo overexposed, and the other half the underside of a bridge.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rivas8409 Goldmember  2,500 posts Likes: 586 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Lemoore, California More info | Jun 16, 2012 14:51 | #14 |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Jun 16, 2012 18:29 | #15 Why do people edit first posts like this? Now this thread is useless I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Dave_M_Photo 997 guests, 196 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
