Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 29 Jun 2012 (Friday) 16:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5Dii and lenses or 5Diii...how to juggle $4,000

 
Night_owl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jun 29, 2012 23:33 |  #16

it makes sense to i guess. why have spend all the $ on the better camera and have mediocre glass. the t2i and even my xsi take spectacular images, so long as spectacular glass like my 17-40 in its sweet spot are attached. all cameras aside, I seriously daydream about having that delicious 70-200 is II. even if its attached to an older body. I just really want full frame for my outdoor and nighttime shoots.


gear : 5D MKII + glassMy photoblog (external link) My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturally ­ Aspirated
Senior Member
Avatar
364 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Jun 29, 2012 23:40 |  #17

I would get the 5d2 and glass. The 5d2 works perfectly fine. And before the 5d2 came out, the 5d classic did perfectly fine too. See a trend? People are quick to dismiss bodies as soon as a new body comes out. Funny how whenever a new body comes out it is touted as the best, and the previous model all of a sudden now blows...


Jonathan
Canon 6d
Canon G15

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jst1tym
Junior Member
24 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jun 29, 2012 23:42 as a reply to  @ post 14651522 |  #18

I came from the 5D MkII and purchased the MkIII. I've never had so much fun learning the capabilities of what the 61pt's can do, HDR, Multiple Exposure, a lot of really neat stuff to learn and experiment with. Having said that, I'm chomping at the bit to purchase a 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II to really push the limits, It's a tuff call if it would be me I say get the 5D MkIII and chomp to bit till you can get a 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II or the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS USM II. Both will cost ya but boy will you have a great time with them! Even if I take an average exposure, it turns out great, those two lenses coupled with the 5D MkIII is awesome!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben805
Goldmember
1,195 posts
Likes: 73
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jun 29, 2012 23:48 |  #19

if you are not shooting fast action and sports, then get the 5D2 and 70-200 2.8 IS II now, personally i'm waiting for the 5D3 price to drop, it's just a matter of want and need :D


5D Mark III, Samyang 14mm, 35LII, 85L II, 100L IS Macro, 24-105L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II. 580EX, AB400, AB800.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Jun 30, 2012 00:10 |  #20

I love my 5D3 and I love my 5D2 as well. I would rather have the better glass than the 5D3 though.

If you look at as investment, you can't go wrong on glass. The body is like a new car - you're losing money as soon as you drive it off the lot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spear
Senior Member
559 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Jun 30, 2012 00:16 as a reply to  @ ben805's post |  #21

You need good focus even in slow action or normal action. You really don't want to get a 5DII when the 5DIII is around .... no way! The 5DIII is superior in so many ways that it would be the worst thing you could possibly do. Bite the bullet and get rid of some lenses and get the 5DIII body. The ability to get tack on pictures in low light with fast good focus cannot be underestimated. Needing fast focus only for action photos is a myth, you need fast accurate focus for most non tripod + live view shots. What really pisses me off is that Canon should have had this focus on the 5DII ... if that had been the case moving to a 5DIII would not be so compelling. But as it is now, unless you take your pictures in a Live View environment, the 5DIII is a dramatically better choice.


Canon 40D, 5DII, 5DIII, G9,G11,S100,G1X, Canon lenses 600mmL f/4 ,24mm-105L f/4, 16-35L II f/2.8, 70-200L II f/2.8, EF 100mm f/2.8, EF 50 f/1.4,17-85 EFS, 10-22 EFS, 580 EX, 2x 580 EXII, 270EX,STE2, 1. 4x Converter, 2.0x Converter. Nikon 800E w/Nikkor 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael ­ Grubb
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
14 posts
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jun 30, 2012 00:28 as a reply to  @ spear's post |  #22

Go with the 5D II and the 70-200 2.8 IS II. The 5D II will serve you very well, and the 70-200 2.8 IS II will serve you for a life time. In two years you can upgrade to the 5D 3 when it's far cheaper.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cputeq007
Senior Member
Avatar
585 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
     
Jun 30, 2012 00:37 |  #23

5D2 and the 70-200 II. The lens is well worth the price of admission, as long as you can accept it'll be far heavier than any of your other lenses (and more conspicuous).

Oh, welcome back from the sandbox (I know I'm 1/2 a year or so too late, but saw your photoblog).

None of us can really help you that much, though, because we're not you. Everyone puts different emphasis on different parts of a camera body (as you see here, some people say 5D2, others 5D3).

I've owned good AFing cameras (D300/700, 1D3, even A77) so I realize the 5D3 is going to be worlds better at some AF scenarios than the 5D2. That in mind, though, for my photography, I really don't feel it's worth the price premium right now.

You may feel differently - it depends on how you do your shooting, etc. FWIW, the 5D2 certainly isn't unusable in low light, nor are the outer points completely useless.


Flickr (external link)
I own camera stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Jun 30, 2012 00:38 |  #24

have owned both, since they first were released. I agree that on a limited budget, unless you shoot action, 5d2 is a far better buy. for what you have described its the way to go. You will get a lot more use, and good images out of the 70-200 IS lens that you will out of upgrading to 5d3 over 5d2. yeah, the autofocus is a huge upgrade (both 61 point, ans spot focus). the high iso is a slight upgrade (1/2 stop), and the FPS is a considerable upgrade, only if you need it. HDR, Multiple exposure, blah blah blah. gimmicks as far as I am concerned. I saw a huge difference in my images, going from a crop to 5d. then a significant difference going to 5d2, b/c of resolution, MFA, better iso, slightly shorter shutter lag, and of course awesome video. 5d2 to 5d3? only when shooting birds, and even then, I miss my 7d.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonneymendoza
Goldmember
3,794 posts
Likes: 391
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 30, 2012 02:58 |  #25

u will get mor eout of focus shots ona 5d2 then on a 5d3.

get the 5d3 and get the 70-200 later.


Canon 5dmkIII | Canon 85L 1.2 | Sigma 35mm ART 1.4|Canon 16-35mm L 2.8 |Canon 24-70mm L f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F2.8L MK2 | Canon 430EX MK2 Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:12 |  #26

spear wrote in post #14651646 (external link)
You need good focus even in slow action or normal action. You really don't want to get a 5DII when the 5DIII is around .... no way! The 5DIII is superior in so many ways that it would be the worst thing you could possibly do. Bite the bullet and get rid of some lenses and get the 5DIII body. The ability to get tack on pictures in low light with fast good focus cannot be underestimated. Needing fast focus only for action photos is a myth, you need fast accurate focus for most non tripod + live view shots. What really pisses me off is that Canon should have had this focus on the 5DII ... if that had been the case moving to a 5DIII would not be so compelling. But as it is now, unless you take your pictures in a Live View environment, the 5DIII is a dramatically better choice.

so nobody could take pictures with fast primes before 5dmk3? what was your first body before 5dmk3 d what you shoot? I am not denying the good AF in 5dmk3 but 5dmk3 with no good glass to go with is bad move IMHO.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:13 |  #27

kevindar wrote in post #14651694 (external link)
have owned both, since they first were released. I agree that on a limited budget, unless you shoot action, 5d2 is a far better buy. for what you have described its the way to go. You will get a lot more use, and good images out of the 70-200 IS lens that you will out of upgrading to 5d3 over 5d2. yeah, the autofocus is a huge upgrade (both 61 point, ans spot focus). the high iso is a slight upgrade (1/2 stop), and the FPS is a considerable upgrade, only if you need it. HDR, Multiple exposure, blah blah blah. gimmicks as far as I am concerned. I saw a huge difference in my images, going from a crop to 5d. then a significant difference going to 5d2, b/c of resolution, MFA, better iso, slightly shorter shutter lag, and of course awesome video. 5d2 to 5d3? only when shooting birds, and even then, I miss my 7d.


well said.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:15 |  #28

jonneymendoza wrote in post #14651865 (external link)
u will get mor eout of focus shots ona 5d2 then on a 5d3.

get the 5d3 and get the 70-200 later.

how come you don't follow your own advice based on the gear in your signature?


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h14nha
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 179
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:45 |  #29

bobbyz wrote in post #14652469 (external link)
how come you don't follow your own advice based on the gear in your signature?

^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^
Hahaha. bw!

To the OP, get the 2, you will love the 70-200 on it, and start saving for the 3 afterwards. Everyone seems to be in agreement in the pricing structure of the 5D3 ( it's very high for improvements the 5D2 should have been equiped with already) so get one when they drop a bit. You never know Canon may have offered the new software for the 7d, whilst they work on something to respond to Nikon's latest offerings. Thats what I'm hoping for :lol:


Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / 500/4 :D XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ducatiwv
Goldmember
Avatar
2,588 posts
Likes: 160
Joined Sep 2006
Location: WV
     
Jun 30, 2012 09:50 |  #30

kevindar wrote in post #14651694 (external link)
have owned both, since they first were released. I agree that on a limited budget, unless you shoot action, 5d2 is a far better buy. for what you have described its the way to go. You will get a lot more use, and good images out of the 70-200 IS lens that you will out of upgrading to 5d3 over 5d2. yeah, the autofocus is a huge upgrade (both 61 point, ans spot focus). the high iso is a slight upgrade (1/2 stop), and the FPS is a considerable upgrade, only if you need it. HDR, Multiple exposure, blah blah blah. gimmicks as far as I am concerned. I saw a huge difference in my images, going from a crop to 5d. then a significant difference going to 5d2, b/c of resolution, MFA, better iso, slightly shorter shutter lag, and of course awesome video. 5d2 to 5d3? only when shooting birds, and even then, I miss my 7d.

Great post btw!!!


Current Equipment list: 5d/30d/24-105 f4/L IS USM / 70-200f4L/ Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR DI II/sigma 10-20/canon 50 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,671 views & 0 likes for this thread, 37 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
5Dii and lenses or 5Diii...how to juggle $4,000
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1229 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.