Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews

Thread started 21 Sep 2010 (Tuesday) 04:37

# Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 EX OS

Jul 03, 2012 04:59 |  #2371

I am guessing but the more detailed shots in this thread are perhaps taken very close to the subject?

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 06:31 |  #2372

Feather detail is a tricky subject. It takes only a little more distance from the subject to make it disappear.

SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo
Nature Shots Portfolio

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 09:27 |  #2373

Looking for some opinions here so owners talk to me.

Headed out to Glacier NP in September and wanting something longer. A 500 isn't in the cards right now, so I've been looking around for other options. My current longest is the Sigma 120-400, which I just sold as I just wasn't fond of that lens. Nor am I truly fond of the 100-400. That leaves me with the 400 5.6 and this with TCs.

In addition to Glacier, I do alot of wildlife and BIF here at home. Having had a 500, weight won't truly be an issue for me. So I'm wondering if this might the right lens as a do all BIF and wildilfe lens. Pictures look great on here, so I'm eager to hear opinions.

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 10:38 |  #2374

Really looking forward to taking this lens to RIAT on Sunday, clicky OS or no clicky OS.

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 12:30 |  #2375

Looking for some opinions here so owners talk to me.

Headed out to Glacier NP in September and wanting something longer. A 500 isn't in the cards right now, so I've been looking around for other options. My current longest is the Sigma 120-400, which I just sold as I just wasn't fond of that lens. Nor am I truly fond of the 100-400. That leaves me with the 400 5.6 and this with TCs.

In addition to Glacier, I do alot of wildlife and BIF here at home. Having had a 500, weight won't truly be an issue for me. So I'm wondering if this might the right lens as a do all BIF and wildilfe lens. Pictures look great on here, so I'm eager to hear opinions.

I've never owned a 400 5.6L but owned a Sigma 150-500 OS, and Canon 100-400L.
Since you mentioned that weight is not an issue and you had a 500 in the past, one of your biggest drawbacks is already eliminated.
It is said that the 400 5.6L is one of the best lenses for BIFs (never tried one), I imagine the 120-300 OS + 1.4x TC won't be able to beat that.
I have used the 120-300 + 1.4x for BIFs and got really good results. A few pages back I posted Canada Geese flying towards me at about 30-40 mph and most shots came out well. But the same was true with my old 100-400L too.
What I can confirm is that using the 2x tc on the Sigma makes the BIFs a little more hit and miss. I do use that occasionally and feel that it still gives me as good of a keeper ratio as my old Sigma 150-500 OS did, however, the 100-400L was better compared to the Sigma 120-300 + 2x combo for BIFs.
As for the reach, obviously the 120-300 + 2x tc is the winner here, even though it is proven that it is not truly 600mm, comes close near infinity focus, but for closer objects it's a little bit shorter.

I like using the 2x Sigma tc on mine, probably I use that configuration most often (I shoot mostly birds). IQ is decent, nothing to write home about, but it's on my 7D and an 18mp crop sensor is pretty tough on lenses.
However, I think the best IQ compromise is the 1.4x tc (170-420mm). If you don't need 600mm, the 420mm images are really great expecially after my PP procedure. I was surprised to find that Sigma's 1.4x APO EX DG tc was better (at least my copy) than Kenko's highly regarded 300 DG Pro.

I am going to the Dayton air show this weekend and put my lens to the test. I am excited but somewhat not really looking forward to swinging my lens around for 5 hours due to the weight... I may actually take my 70-200 2.8 OS too with the tcs for events that happen closer

Anyway, good luck with your decision.

SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo
Nature Shots Portfolio

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 13:56 |  #2376

gabebalazs wrote in post #14665625
I may actually take my 70-200 2.8 OS too with the tcs for events that happen closer

Although I do take my 400/5.6 to airshows, I frequently find it too long. I have a Sigma 50-150/2.8 with 1.4x TC mounted on another body and the 400 plus that combo do great.

Ian - http://www.icassell.sm​ugmug.com
Canon 7D2, 7D, 30D, Canon 500 f/4L, Canon EF 400/5.6L, Canon 70-200/2.8L II, Canon 100/2.8 Macro, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Canon 50/1.8 Mk I, Canon 40/2.8 STM, Rokinon 8/3.5 FE., Sigma 10-20EX/4-5.6, Sigma 1.4X and 2X EX, Canon 1.4x II, Induro CT313/AT214/GHB-2, Canon 600EX-RT, Olympus TG-3

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 18:11 |  #2377

Looking for some opinions here so owners talk to me.

Headed out to Glacier NP in September and wanting something longer. A 500 isn't in the cards right now, so I've been looking around for other options. My current longest is the Sigma 120-400, which I just sold as I just wasn't fond of that lens. Nor am I truly fond of the 100-400. That leaves me with the 400 5.6 and this with TCs.

In addition to Glacier, I do alot of wildlife and BIF here at home. Having had a 500, weight won't truly be an issue for me. So I'm wondering if this might the right lens as a do all BIF and wildilfe lens. Pictures look great on here, so I'm eager to hear opinions.

If you need to get to 420-600 mm this lens is the best out there, n0t counting the high  big canon primes. For $3200 + a 2x tc its as good as it gets. Or look for a used 500 f/4 IS. I may sell 120-300 os and 50-500 os and look for the used canon 500 1DX\ 5diii gripped \ tokina 12-24 f/4 /sigma 24-60 f2.8 \ \ sigma 120-300 OS \ sigma 50 f1.4 \ canon 500 f4 IS \ canon1.4 III tc \ canon 2xii tc \sigma 2x dg tc \ 580ex \ 2x 430ex flickr  LIKES 0 LOG IN TO REPLY Jul 03, 2012 18:31 | #2378 It's unlikely (unless you're very lucky) that you will find a used Canon 500/4 for under ~$5500 and I've seen them for well over $7K (which is more than the MkI version cost new). I love my 400 and it's a super BIF lens, but clearly not as versatile for multiple subjects as a zoom. Another lens to consider is an old 500/4.5, but they didn't have IS and you can't use it with a TC on a crop-body and maintain AF. My current thought (I'm still wrestling with this one and debating the Sigma) is to buy a used 300/2.8 IS version I and use it with 1.4 and 2X TC's. A used one can be found for a bit over the price of the new 120-300 ( ~$4K range). It does perform well with TC's but, as with any lens, the AF does slow down.

Ian - http://www.icassell.sm​ugmug.com
Canon 7D2, 7D, 30D, Canon 500 f/4L, Canon EF 400/5.6L, Canon 70-200/2.8L II, Canon 100/2.8 Macro, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Canon 50/1.8 Mk I, Canon 40/2.8 STM, Rokinon 8/3.5 FE., Sigma 10-20EX/4-5.6, Sigma 1.4X and 2X EX, Canon 1.4x II, Induro CT313/AT214/GHB-2, Canon 600EX-RT, Olympus TG-3

 LIKES 0

Jul 03, 2012 19:28 |  #2379

icassell wrote in post #14667033
It's unlikely (unless you're very lucky) that you will find a used Canon 500/4 for under ~$5500 and I've seen them for well over$7K (which is more than the MkI version cost new). I love my 400 and it's a super BIF lens, but clearly not as versatile for multiple subjects as a zoom. Another lens to consider is an old 500/4.5, but they didn't have IS and you can't use it with a TC on a crop-body and maintain AF.

My current thought (I'm still wrestling with this one and debating the Sigma) is to buy a used 300/2.8 IS version I and use it with 1.4 and 2X TC's. A used one can be found for a bit over the price of the new 120-300 ( ~ $4K range). It does perform well with TC's but, as with any lens, the AF does slow down. I know I've been looking at the prices. I should of got one 3 years ago instead of a 150-500 0s, 50-500 os and the 120-300 os all bought new in the last 3 years. You know the old saying , Don't be a dunce buy once. And here I am still wanting one. The canon 300 2.8 IS version I is more of a lateral move in IQ and backwards without a zoom for me. I have seen some used canon 400 2.8 IS for under$6000. I think they are bigger and heavier than the 500 but not positive

1DX\ 5diii gripped \ tokina 12-24 f/4 /sigma 24-60 f2.8 \ \ sigma 120-300 OS \ sigma 50 f1.4 \ canon 500 f4 IS \ canon1.4 III tc \ canon 2xii tc \sigma 2x dg tc \ 580ex \ 2x 430ex flickr

 LIKES 0

Jul 04, 2012 00:39 |  #2380

Honey Monster wrote in post #14661922
Camera was a 7D
1st red kite is about 30% of original frame, 2nd about 60%. Both yellowhammers are only about 20% of original frame. The yellowhammers were about 25 feet away. I'm not really sure how much a picture can be cropped and still be OK. My PP (in LR3) is still a bit trial and error, so maybe could be improved. I did increase exposure on the 1st yellowhammer by 2/3 stop in PP.

Thats why, its just the heavy cropping thats all

As for PP, my standard processing from RAW is to simply increase sharpening from 25 to 50 strength, Thats all that i usually do, then apply contrast/exposure adjustments and for birds sometimes a hair of clarity and saturation...

Check out my Flickr below for some bird shots if you're curious, id post them but i didnt use the Sigma for them...

As for blowing yellow, i find the 7D struggles most with the red channel, tending to turn it magenta or blow it out completely, But my 30D did that too, with yellow it just tends to make it orange when in auto white balance...

Anyways for long lenses, this does seem to be the best kit short of going to a big Canon prime, the only other possible option is a Sigma 500mm f/4.5 HSM, which I have seen, shockingly enough, for under \$2000 before, but you lose OS on it... But this seems to be handholdable, just...

Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)

 LIKES 0

Jul 04, 2012 07:24 |  #2381

Jay T wrote in post #14661987
here's two from before it broke. This is baby huey and a yellow warbler feeding her big baby. Thats amazing

OT -- damn I hate those cowbirds! Poor yellow warbler.

5DII, 70D
17-40mm f/4 USM L, 24-70mm f/4 IS USM L, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM L, 24mm f/3.5 TS-E L, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.4 USM, 100mm f/2.8 IS USM L, 300mm f/2.8 IS USM II L, 430 EX II, 270 EX II, 1.4x TC III, 2x TC III, Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC

 LIKES 0

Jul 05, 2012 11:39 |  #2382

Some from today.

Firstly, with the 1.4x TC:

Golden eagle by IanEv, on Flickr

Caracara by IanEv, on Flickr

Bald eagle by IanEv, on Flickr

Burrowing owl by IanEv, on Flickr

And with the 2x:

Bald eagle portrait by IanEv, on Flickr

Barn owl in flight by IanEv, on Flickr

 LIKES 0

Jul 05, 2012 12:44 |  #2383

Amazing pictures, are they cropped much ?

 LIKES 0

Jul 05, 2012 13:11 |  #2384

Thanks. Both the owls are cropped the most, the others have maybe lost a sliver at the edges but not a great deal.

 LIKES 0

Jul 05, 2012 16:31 |  #2385

Fabulous shots.

5D Mark II | EF 24-70 f/2.8 L | EF 70-200 f/4 L IS | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 50 f/1.8 | EF 1.4x II | Nissin Di866 II | flickriver | Portfolio | flickr

 LIKES 0

1,611,302 views & 369 likes for this thread
Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 EX OS
AAA
 x 1600 y 1600

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!