Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 07 Jul 2012 (Saturday) 19:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is F2.8 enough for wedding

 
vinmunoz
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
17,436 posts
Gallery: 444 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10276
Joined Sep 2010
Location: California
     
Jul 07, 2012 19:54 |  #1

Guyz,
This will be my first ever wedding gig. The fastest lens that I have are as seen in my Sig... the Sigma 17-50 and my Canon 60mm macro.

Do you think it's enough for a church wedding without flash?

If not, i wanna give up my 60mm macro to fund the Canon 50mm F1.4... do you think it will be a good move?

Please help.


| SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
INSTAGRAM (external link)- WEBSITE (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link) - 500PX (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michael ­ Grubb
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
14 posts
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jul 07, 2012 20:24 |  #2

Since you mentioned you have the Canon 60 macro, I am assuming you are shooting on a Canon crop sensor camera. In that case the Canon 17-55 2.8 IS is a good choice for weddings. Other lenses I have used and like at weddings are the Canon 10-22 and Canon 70-200. I would recommend shooting the wedding with a hand held off-camera flash via a 3 foot synch cord using a diffuser or bounce card. Or better yet have an assistant holding a monopod with flash attached and use a remote triggering device like Pocket Wizards. Use flash indoors, use flash outdoors. Outdoors, try controlling (darkening) the ambient light and use flash fill for a nice punch or pop to the photos. Flash is your friend, just get it off camera, and diffuse or bounce it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
claudiopiedrola
Member
70 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jul 07, 2012 20:35 |  #3

it depends on the venue but for me it would be close to impossible with only that lens which i own two copies of it, i can't get the 50 1.2 cos i been getting the job done with the 50 1.4 you know great not only for weddings but for every nice portrait shots!

Get at least a nice wide angle prime like the 24 1.4 II L cos i'm sure that every darn cent i paid for it is well worth it! even with it you'll find yourself shooting at high iso like with the 5d mk II and a 580 ex ii and i tell you what that lens is unreal!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vinmunoz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
17,436 posts
Gallery: 444 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10276
Joined Sep 2010
Location: California
     
Jul 07, 2012 20:57 |  #4

Thanks guys. let me ask if i can use flash.


| SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
INSTAGRAM (external link)- WEBSITE (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link) - 500PX (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steensgaard
Member
45 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Denmark
     
Jul 08, 2012 03:36 |  #5

I just shot my first wedding and the minister would only allow me to stay in the back of the church. I used my 70-200mm and sometimes 200mm wasn't long enough.

I have a 5d mk2 and I had to use ISO 3200 because it was a rainy day and that made the church very dark. Even so f2.8 was fast enough, so I guess it will be sufficient for most situations if you can go to ISO 3200.
I used my 85mm f1.8 a lot during the day, but not in the church because it didn't give me enough reach.


5d mk2/450d both gripped
24-70L, 70-200 f4L, 85 f1.8, 50 f1.8, Sigma 35 f1.4, 55-250 IS, 18-55 IS
Yongnuo YN-565EX, YN-560 II, YN-460 II and Cactus V5 triggers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jul 08, 2012 08:05 |  #6

I'd want something with more reach than that 60mm for a wedding.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jul 08, 2012 11:38 |  #7

rick_reno wrote in post #14686833 (external link)
I'd want something with more reach than that 60mm for a wedding.

This. And I wouldn't use flash in a church. Too distracting and I think it is rude.

My main wedding lens is the 135 2.0.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
auroraskye
Goldmember
Avatar
2,445 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Plano, TX
     
Jul 08, 2012 14:44 |  #8

Scope out your location, test the lens and if you need something that lets in more light, rent..


I am super cool n' stuff.
http://www.brandithomp​sonphotography.com (external link)
Like Me On Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
albertaskater
Senior Member
347 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Jul 08, 2012 22:09 |  #9

Do you have a second body? If only one body you will need a zoom lens. No way will you be able to shoot a wedding on a single fixed length, just cuz it's fast. There's just too much going on needing rapid adjustment. Test the venue if you can and rent or borrow suitable gear if you have to.


Erika
7D, 350D, 18-55 XT kit, 18-135 IS, 50 1.4, 70-200 f/2.8L non IS, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeaceFire
Goldmember
Avatar
2,281 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
     
Jul 08, 2012 22:50 |  #10

I'm not familiar with the 60D at all so I can't speak for it's capabilities in low light, but with my 5DII I shot a wedding in a low-lit church at ISO 3200 with my 24-105 f/4 lens with absolutely no issues. I had my 70-200 with me but it wasn't a huge church and I was able to move around a bit so I didn't feel I needed the reach or the speed. I actually felt I needed the wide angle more the get those "big church" pictures. But, anyway, if properly exposed, you should be fine with f/2.8 with the ISO cranked up.


My Gear List / My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixil ­ Studio
Goldmember
Avatar
1,270 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Denver
     
Jul 10, 2012 00:36 |  #11

dont shoot weddings wide open unless you really know what you are doing. and with that camera dont shoot past iso 800 either. my advice get a good flash and more and better equipment.
i usually show up with 2 cameras 5 lenses and 3 flashes. do you have a back up plan?


Denver wedding and event photographer (external link)
My photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fstopnoob
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 14, 2012 23:49 |  #12

Just to throw this out there. when i was thinking of doing my first wedding, my sis told me to make sure I had insurance.. Just incase everything went tits up.. lol..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2ndshooter
Member
42 posts
Joined May 2012
     
Jul 15, 2012 09:20 |  #13

I shoot with a 60D, and Pixil Studio is right... Past ISO 800 the pictures aren't that great, and I would never go past ISO 1600.

2.8 should be fine, unless you're in the darkest 10% of churches... So unless you've been in the church, you'd be taking a bit of a chance.

We don't use flash during the ceremony ever.

As others have said, you might need a longer lens... About 10% of churches ask us to stay in the balcony... In which case you'd be screwed... Especially in a very dark church. *edit* Do you still have the 100mm macro 2.8?? We use it (IS version) at almost every wedding! If you are stuck in the balcony, you can use it to get some shoots, but you would really need a 70-200 2.8 to get the tight shots. (Ring exchange, etc)

Bottom line is, you'll learn more about what you need by talking with the officient and seeing the church in person then you'll ever get from us. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 15, 2012 14:54 |  #14

I shoot up to ISO6400 on F2.8 lenses for ceremonies, I rarely have a problem. My cameras are pretty good at high iso though.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeaceFire
Goldmember
Avatar
2,281 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
     
Jul 15, 2012 18:50 |  #15

Yeah, the 60D as a prosumer camera probably isn't the best at high ISOs. However, I wouldn't hesitate for a second to go up to 1600 with my 40D. If properly exposed it doesn't really make that big of a difference.


My Gear List / My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,513 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Is F2.8 enough for wedding
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1142 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.