Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 23 Jul 2012 (Monday) 11:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

How many have both 70-200 and 100-400

 
Roroco
Senior Member
647 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Jul 24, 2012 06:10 |  #31

Talley wrote in post #14759545 (external link)
hows the AF speed?

FedEx delivers my 70-200 today. I'll let you know later. :)


Roger
Gear List: 5D Mark III -- 50mm f/1.4 -- 85mm f1.8 -- 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro -- 17-40mm f/4L -- Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC -- 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II -- 2.0X III TC

Lights -- Alien Bees B800 -- 580 EX II -- Yongnuo YN-560 II & YN-568EX -- Mother Nature -- RF 602s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
snowblower
Member
123 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jul 24, 2012 16:04 |  #32

I have both and find they both have their place and use. I started with a 7D and was seriously looking at selling the 100-400 after purchasing the 70-200 but now I'm very happy I didn't. When I switched to a 5D III the 70-200 suddenly became very short when I was using it to shoot on a professional baseball field. I'm glad I still have both. I just finished up a cruise to Alaska and went back through my pics and would have never guessed that more than 60% of the distance shots (>100mm) were with the 100-400. Love them both and wouldn't sell either of them.


Canon 1D-X Mk II | Canon 1D-X | Canon 5DIII |Canon 8-15 F4L Fisheye | Canon 16-35 F2.8L | Canon 24-70 F2.8L II | Canon 35 F1.4L II | Canon 50 F1.2L | Canon 85 F1.2L II | Canon 70-200 F2.8L II IS | Canon 400 f2.8L | Canon 200-400 f4 IS Extender 1.4xL | Canon 800 F5.6L | Speed Light 600 EX II x6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,355 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 593
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 24, 2012 16:13 |  #33

I have both on a 5D. I got the 100-400 first since it picked up where the 24-105 left off. The weight and long minimum focal length kept me from using it as much as I'd wanted to so I added a 70-200 f/4. I like the relatively light weight and small size. The 100-400 is now my reach lens when I know I'll be shooting something small like a bird or a plane in flight. The 70-200 is more of an outdoor event lens, like shooting kids running around in the back yard. I never carry both.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scooby888
Senior Member
264 posts
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jul 25, 2012 09:26 |  #34

I have three and can't decide which I don't need....!

100-400 L
70-200 f2.8 IS
70-200 f4 IS


5DII Gripped, 7D Gripped, Canon 60D, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Canon 17-55 f2.8, Tokina 50-135 f2.8, Canon 24-70 f2.8 L, Canon 24-105 L f4, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS, Canon 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, Canon EF 100 L Macro f2.8, Canon 50mm f1.4, Canon 1.4tc mkii, Speedlite 580ii, 2x Speedlite 430ii, Monfrotto tripods

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pssc
Member
94 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Riverside, CA/ Lake Havasu, AZ
     
Jul 25, 2012 12:44 as a reply to  @ Scooby888's post |  #35

Like so many others, I have both. My 70-200F4 IS is extremely sharp, but my least used lens. It is never long enough for what I shoot when reach is needed. So the 24-105 and 1-4 are my most used lenses. However, when I do use the 70-200, the pics are super sharp and I look for reasons and circumstances to put it to good use.

Cheers, Steve


1dm4, 5Dm2, and a bunch of other stuff.
www.sscphoto.zenfolio.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,672 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 116
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Jul 27, 2012 10:26 as a reply to  @ pssc's post |  #36

I had a Sigma 70-200 and really liked it, but once I obtained the 100-400 I found that I didn't really use it much. I had other lenses covering the 70-100 range, so I sold it and have not really missed it. YMMV.


Digital EOS 7D Mark II Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leemik
Member
118 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 27, 2012 10:33 as a reply to  @ pknight's post |  #37

I use a 70-200f2.8 IS with a 2x teleconverter

much lighter to carry around than 2 big lenses


my gear (external link)| my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyniev
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,501 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 837
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Las Vegas
     
Jul 27, 2012 10:41 |  #38

leemik wrote in post #14777533 (external link)
I use a 70-200f2.8 IS with a 2x teleconverter

much lighter to carry around than 2 big lenses

True, but when you cannot change lenses, carrying two cameras with both lenses make sense


Cheers,
Tony
Leica M10 & M3
Sony A7R4 & A7R
Canon 5D2 & 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanaS
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Jul 28, 2012 19:49 as a reply to  @ tonyniev's post |  #39

I have both the 70-200 f/2.8L Mk II and the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS. I use the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS on my 7D and the 70-200 f/2.8L Mk II on my 1D MKII N and love them both. I use the 100-400 for walks around the zoo and the botanical garden, but if I need razor sharp or low light shots the 70-200 is the gun I go to.


Dana S
1D MarkII N, 7D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, 24-105mm f/4L IS, 50mm f/1.4 USM, Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM APO Macro, Gitzo Tripod, Manfrotto Monopod, couple ball-heads, etc... Image editing okay.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keyan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,319 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jul 28, 2012 21:00 |  #40

I have their love child, the 70-300L :)


Cameras: 7D2, S100
Lenses: 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, 18-135 STM, 24-70 f/4L IS USM, 50 f/1.4 USM,70-300L IS USM
Other Stuff: 430 EX II, Luma Labs Loop 3, CamRanger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
Avatar
12,458 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
     
Jul 28, 2012 22:00 |  #41

I don't own the 100-400L but I love my 70-200. I've rented the 100-400 several times for events I know I'd use it but you cannot substitute that F2.8 if you use it. Obviously if you're not an indoor/lowlight shooting person then you may not find any use for it. I use the 100-400L on my ship a lot for INTEL but generally I use my 70-200 for walking around topside and needed zoom. The F4 or lower adds a nice look to the photos the 100-400 doesn't offer.


Last Shot Photography
My Site (external link) ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mackami
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver
     
Jul 28, 2012 23:40 |  #42

I use the 70-200 f2.8 (non-IS) for one daughter's dance recitals and volleyball games in low light and the 100-400 for my other daughter's softball games. I love the push-pull zoom on the 100-400 and I lighten the load slightly by removing the tripod ring. For me, this combo works really well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,110 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Jul 29, 2012 00:18 |  #43

For sports, I would use my 100-400 most of the time when the light was good and the 70-200 when during cloudy days or dusk games. Loved the reach of the 100-400, but hated the slow focusing. For this reason, I just bought a 300mm f/2.8 IS yesterday. If this works well for me, I'm going to sell the 100-400. If canon comes up with a new version of the 100-400, I'll be the first one in line to buy it!


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,502 posts
Gallery: 126 photos
Likes: 1282
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 29, 2012 00:34 |  #44

The 100-400L is "sharp enough".

I cant sell it just yet but its the least sharp lens I own. I dont mind because I know its old tech but my only alternative in the canon line unless I go primes.

In majority of cases my 70-200 suites my needs. I just purchased a 100-400 because I wanted it for a vacation trip. Otherwise I never would really need this lens.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keesbeest
Senior Member
Avatar
582 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 369
Joined Mar 2009
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
     
Jul 29, 2012 00:58 |  #45

I had both but sold the 100-400 for a 400 prime.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

6,553 views & 0 likes for this thread
How many have both 70-200 and 100-400
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Yekeen Jamiu
1002 guests, 234 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.