Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 22 Aug 2012 (Wednesday) 13:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

No Love For The 50mm L?

 
kasey
Member
191 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Aug 23, 2012 03:15 |  #16

I hope they make a new 50 f1.0 L II.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
cineraceus
Member
Avatar
197 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Gold Coast
     
Aug 23, 2012 04:45 |  #17

This is the lens I have used more than any other for the last 2.5 years. It probably does have a bit of focus shift, but you can't argue with the photos. Don't get too worried by the naysayers. There is a reason it is so popular.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pdx_btk78
Member
81 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Pdx
     
Aug 23, 2012 09:15 |  #18

Love my 50L so far, been using it for a lot of low light shoots now and have been very impressed by its performance mated to the 5D3. I think if I give it some more time, it will edge out the 70-200f2.8 as my favorite lens.


5D Mk III & 7D | 430 EX II
Canon 50mm f1.2L | 16-35mm f2.8L Mk II | 24-105mm f4L IS | 70-200mm f2.8L IS Mk II | Σ 150-500mm
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scott ­ rolf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
108 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 23, 2012 09:22 as a reply to  @ pdx_btk78's post |  #19

Thank you for the positive feedback. I was beginning to cause myself un-necessary buyer's remorse.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pkilla
Goldmember
Avatar
2,943 posts
Likes: 56
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Boston
     
Aug 23, 2012 09:37 |  #20

I don't own the 50L but can't wait to get it this is like my dream lens right here ....


T3i griped - rokinon 8mm/rokinon 35 1.4/rokinon 85mm 1.4/
sigma 17-50/nikon 50mm 1.2 ai-s/nikon 28mm ai-s 2.8/
helios 40-2/helios 44-2/mir 1b 37mm 2.8/supertak 135/
trioplan/http://www.flickr.com/​photos/pkilla617/ (external link)
CHECK OUT MY BLOG PICS http://pkilla61.blogsp​ot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,070 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1306
Joined Nov 2011
Location: PA
     
Aug 23, 2012 09:46 |  #21

i've only had this lens about 2 weeks and loving it so far... came from a 50 1.4 then sigma version... i gotta say this is a def better lens from built to image quality. It'a bit pricey but when you see the pictures taken with the lens, you'll automaticly forget how much the lens was :lol:


Phuong
Gear List / Feedbacks

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
billppw350z
Member
Avatar
210 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Carson City
     
Aug 23, 2012 16:14 as a reply to  @ post 14894774 |  #22

The 50 1.2L has been the lens people love to hate since before it even came out. Someone wrote a lousy review about it on FM over a month prior to the lens being available.

I’ve been a big fan and defender of this lens on this and other forums since I got my 50L in December of 2006 with a date code of UU10. This lens has been nothing but joy for me over the last five and a half years.

I have the 24L II, 35L, 85L II, 100L, 135L in addition to the 50L, and the 50 is my favorite. As shown in this post: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=14874056&postco​unt=14 The 50L is relatively sharp wide open, focuses fast enough for sports, and is second to none in auto focus accuracy/consistency. Its ability to auto focus in low light is extraordinary, it will snap into focus in poor lighting situations where all others will just hunt and fail.

The color/contrast of the 50L is top notch; as good as or better than my other L primes. IMHO while the out of focus blur is not quite as smooth due to its shorter focal length as the 85L and 135L, it is better at separating the subject from the fore/background making it “pop.” It even makes foreground blur look good; with other lenses it usually looks creepy.

Yes it “focus shifts.” So does the 85L at similar apertures/distances from the subject. It is “the nature of the beast” with very fast lenses with great blur. I have never had a real world picture ruined by focus shift with either lens because I follow proper technique and use the outer auto focus points, unless I’m in a low light situation at f1.2, or taking group/landscape pictures, etc at f5.6 or smaller.

In defense of the “non-lovers;” there were a lot of issues both real and imagined with the 50L when it first came out. This seems to have subsided, and I don’t think it’s because of a “silent fix.” I believe it has to do with Canon finally working out the bugs in the 50 1.2L’s manufacturing process, and their repair technicians starting to figure out how to fix the bad ones that inevitably come out. It is a relatively new and difficult to make design. It could also have to do with micro focus adjustment and improving auto focusing ability as better cameras come out. Maybe it started to dawn on Canon that their 50mm flagship standard lens should never suck, and are doing a better job of quality assurance.

Many feel the extra third/half/whatever stop and the small increase in sharpness of the 50L over the 50 1.4 is not worth the extra $1,100. They’re right. The color/contrast can usually be matched in Photoshop and bokeh is in the eye of the beholder. I purchased the 50L for its much better auto focus accuracy/consistency and it has yet to let me down. If you’ve ever missed that perfect smile, perfect moment, or perfect light because the picture was not in perfect focus, then you will understand why Canon can charge a premium for the L. You can’t fix an out of focus picture in post and there are rarely “do overs” in photography. When the moment is gone, it’s gone.

As I step down off my soap box I can’t say I love the 50 1.2L; it’s just a tool. I do love some of the pictures I’ve taken with it and how it makes me look like a better photographer than I actually am.


Bill
Regardless of the genre or medium, I just like capturing beauty and recording memories
billppw350z.smugmug.co​m/ (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maxblack
I feel like I'm in danger
Avatar
2,020 posts
Likes: 300
Joined Sep 2008
Location: NYC Area
     
Aug 23, 2012 16:31 |  #23

The 50mm f1.2 is special.
Use it and understand it.
It's got it's own vibe.
All love.
Period.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maximus_73
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2012
     
Aug 23, 2012 16:51 |  #24

billppw350z wrote in post #14897923 (external link)
Many feel the extra third/half/whatever stop and the small increase in sharpness of the 50L over the 50 1.4 is not worth the extra $1,100. They’re right.

I agree almost everything you said. Why do people paid a premium price for a Ferrari Enzo instead of getting a Mustang Shelby or Camero ZL1?
If sharpness is all we want than 50 f/1.8 is good enough.


Cameras: Canon EOS M, FujiFilm X-T1| Lenses: FD 50mm 1.4, Fujinon 23mm 1.4, Fujinon 56 1.2, Zeiss 32mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cancan7
Senior Member
504 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jan 2008
     
Aug 23, 2012 18:08 as a reply to  @ maximus_73's post |  #25

I bought it when I only had the 7D, because I wanted a 50mm lens that could focus reliably in poor light. I'm pretty pleased with it, sharpness is nothing if you can't lock focus :p


5D III, 7D(gripped)
17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200 2.8L IS(v1), 24L(v1) 35 2, 50 1.8II, 50L, 85LII, 100 2.8 macro, MP-E 65, Sigma 15 2.8 FE, 150-500, MT-24 EX, 580EX, 430EX
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bdillon
Senior Member
693 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2011
     
Aug 23, 2012 18:19 |  #26

thestone11 wrote in post #14894774 (external link)
My 50L is spot on, I love mine to death. Just a friendly reminder, you will easily miss focus when shooting wide open using the center AF point and recompose your shot.

Right here. Once I quit doing that I drastically reduced the number of throw aways I have.

Whenever possible I AF with center point, I never recompose wide open, and shooting from a monopod/tripod helps. When your DOF is that shallow, your body swaying a mere half inch is enouch to make your shot go soft.

I was one of the guys who thought the 85 1.2L is a POS.....then I started doing this and I am MUCH more happy with it than I ever was.
For portraiture, I even started using MF and live view.

I'm hoping the 5DIII grabs better focus on the outer points.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dadgummit
Senior Member
Avatar
977 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2012 18:33 |  #27

I did a lot of research on this lens reading many threads on several forums. It seems that most of the hate is from either early versions of this lens or people remembering early versions of this lens assuming it is still the same now. Even though it did not get a different part number I highly suspect Canon did some changes to this lens. most people who have this lens now seem very happy.


My Humble Gear List
I shutter to think how many people are underexposed and lacking depth in this field.Rick Steves

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,323 views & 0 likes for this thread
No Love For The 50mm L?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is CalebCorneloup
941 guests, 324 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.