Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 26 Aug 2012 (Sunday) 05:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon 70-200 f/4L IS v non IS

 
jpdunn
Member
Avatar
31 posts
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Cairns, Australia
     
Aug 26, 2012 05:47 |  #1

Hey guys, so I am going to be purchasing the canon 70-200 lens very soon, and I am wondering, is the IS really worth it?

Pretty much the same specs between the two, apart from the IS...and almost $300 in price haha
Has anyone used either of these lenses? and if so is there a need for the IS?


http://jpdunn.daportfo​lio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Aug 26, 2012 06:22 |  #2

I've used both, and I kept the non-IS, because IQ is virtually identical, and IS to me is not worth double the price (not sure about prices in australia, but elsewhere the IS costs twice the amount the non-IS does).

Personally I don't need IS, its handy when I have it, but I'm not going to pay as much as a good tripod for it on one lens when there are few other benefits that come with the inflated price.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,241 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 310
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Aug 26, 2012 07:03 |  #3

For me, "When in doubt......IS".
This is one of Canon's best lenses for sharpness and ease of use. The Image Stabilzation really shines on this lens. You can always turn off IS, but you can't turn it on if you don't have it.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon Pixma PRO-10 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TSchrief
Goldmember
Avatar
2,099 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Bourbon, Indiana
     
Aug 26, 2012 07:14 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

I am well past 50. I need IS to get to 1/FL. It is worth it to me at 200mm and longer. I wish the IS on the 100-400 were a stop or so better!


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
     
Aug 26, 2012 07:18 |  #5

If it were a choice between a 70-200 f/2.8 and f/4 IS... but since it's f/4 IS vs. non, so definitely go for the IS version, the f/4 aperture is really going to need it, esp. at 200mm. The great thing about the plain 70-200 f/4 is that it's Canon's cheapest L-series lens, a super choice if you're totally broke, but absolutely need something with a red ring on it.


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2791
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Aug 26, 2012 07:32 |  #6

I had both and now I have the 2.8 sigma OS version. I never really needed the IS but I wanted it for videoing. Yes I've been able to get some nice shots with the IS but the canon I was never really able to get below 1/60 reliably enough vs. the sigma I can get down to 1/10 easily


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,353 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1678
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Aug 26, 2012 07:36 |  #7

It's hard to argue with somebody that has had both and then opts for one or the other. All I'll have to say is that IS is well worth the extra $'s for me and that the 70-200 F4IS is an outstanding lens.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skul
Member
92 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2011
Location: SE Texas
     
Aug 26, 2012 07:55 |  #8

I had the f/4 non-IS for six months. Traded it in for the f/2.8 IS.
The IS can be very helpful under lower light conditions. (the 2.8 helped too)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
modchild
Goldmember
Avatar
1,469 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Lincoln, Uk
     
Aug 26, 2012 08:09 |  #9

Like Skul, I started with the f4 non IS and got some great photos with it outdoors, however I eventually sold it and got the 2.8 IS MkI which was much better. The IS was a very welcome addition as was the extra stop, but it wasn't as sharp as the f4 wide open. When stopped down to f3.5 it was a lot better though. I recently sold the MkI to put the money towards a MkII and the MkII blows the rest away. The MkII is sharper at f2.8 than the MkI was at f4 and the IS is fantastic as well. It's worth starting with the f4 if you are planning to upgrade at all because the price of the f4 doesn't seem to be going any lower than it is already and is great to start with.


EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CHUCK ­ A
Senior Member
358 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 39
Joined Jun 2011
Location: New Jersey USA
     
Aug 26, 2012 08:33 as a reply to  @ modchild's post |  #10

Got the non IS and keep for almost a month before sending it back. No question......spend the extra cash and get the IS model. It is much more usful in lower light conditions.


Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/​maggiesguy (external link), http://charles-aitken.artistwebsites.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
44,264 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3464
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 26, 2012 19:00 |  #11

I don't know the price differential for IS in Australia, but in the USA it is typically about $500 more for IS (except in lower end consumer lenses like the 18-55 vs. 18-55 IS) For $500 more, it certainly is well worth it. I owned the 70-200 f/4L before the IS lens came out, then bought the 70-200 f/4L IS.

The IS really helps with the hand holdability of the 70-200 in lower light. Consider that on APS-C the usual lower shutter speed for hand holding 200mm is 1/320. Being able to hand hold 200mm to 1/80 (or even 1/40) is really valuable, especially if your subject is not moving that rapidly or continuously.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dochollidayda
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2077
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 26, 2012 23:49 |  #12

Definitely the IS, for me that is. I have handheld F4L IS to 1/20 at 200mm. I had slight movement but IS took care of that and the images turned out sharp. It gives you an additional stop just because you can drop the shutter speed to 1/40 or 1/20.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Judsonzhao
Goldmember
Avatar
1,198 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Aug 27, 2012 00:10 |  #13

IS is a huge thing, I can go down to 1/30 at 200 on a crop body, makes it usable before sunset for out door´╝î or low light portrait.


Fly me away.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,646 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1001
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Aug 27, 2012 08:20 as a reply to  @ Judsonzhao's post |  #14

IS? Yes. I find it almost indispensible. Unless you shoot a lot of fast moving subjects, the f4 IS is one of the best deals going.

Another advantage to the IS version is if you do like I did and add a 1.4x II teleconverter. Now you are talking a 280mm at the far end and handolding that without IS is going to be a bit dicey.

I have a nice tripod, but I really don't use it that often. I prefer to handhold, so my long lenses need IS. Even with my 17-55 the IS is useful. I've taken photos at 1/13 second, zoomed to 35mm, handheld with perfect sharpness.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
Aug 27, 2012 08:56 |  #15

The specs are NOT the same between the 2. Check out the photozone.de reviews on each. The IS version has the better IQ.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,907 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 70-200 f/4L IS v non IS
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
861 guests, 251 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.