Clignoteur wrote in post #14892989
don't get me wrong but I have a feeling those are 2 different pictures. The one was light with a white light and the other one was shot just like it was. Why do I say that? well I see new shadows underneath the car behind. I see white stripes now as reflections on the side of the car and on the roof. The taillight has lost his round glow. And now there is some kind of square in the back glass window of the car.
If I'm correct ( I say if cause I can't work with photoshop at all ) I would rather see the real picture before after edditing, even if the first one was lit with some lightsource.
If I'm wrong, sorry for that but I told already I'm a noob with PS
Hope you don't mind I question this picture like this.
with kind regards
Here, let me copy the Flickr description onto here for you:
'The After shot is made up of 3 exposures, these cover the lightpainting of the car.
After a chunk of photoshopping I still wasn't happy with the result, something was wrong - but what!?
Then I chopped out the tree and sky for something else, instantly the shot looked better! Then I pushed it a bit harder and went for the sunset - until I arrived at the result'