So as the title suggests I bought a Sigma 85, and now that I'm expecting my third copy of this lens to came back from B&H I started thinking about alternatives and preparing for the worse,because I'm not going to get a fourth copy!
I started playing around with the idea of getting a 70-200 F2.8, and that of course brought up the question: "but which one???" so now that I narrowed it down a bit to the final candidate, which are:
1. The Canon "superzoom"70-200L F2.8 ISII (superzoom is because it's so dam GOOD not because of the FL)
2. The Sigma 70-200 OS but due to my recent experience with Sigma that just might not be the best idea... yet it's still on the table
3. And last is the Tamron 70-200 which I hear is very good optically and it's biggest downfall is the AF being slow
So to my question did a lot of you guys have problems (or heard of people having problems) with the Sigma?
And just how bad is the Tamron AF? is it a bit slow but not so noticeable or is it so slow you can grab a cup of coffee while it auto focuses?
And as for the Canon I guess I just need to decide if I want to shell out the cash for perfection... or the closest thing to it
P.S I can afford each one of them, I'm just not sure I want to
Any other suggestions will be welcome!