Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 31 Aug 2012 (Friday) 21:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

SmugMug Price Increase

 
mpix345
Goldmember
2,870 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 01, 2012 23:52 |  #46

GwagDesigns wrote in post #14936548 (external link)
...And also, with my event coverage, moving that amount of photos elsewhere would be a ridiculous task.

Is that what SM is banking on? Did they strategically keep price flat longer than they should have to make it more difficult for people to decide to walk away?

It seems like the User Agreement should include some sort of annual cap on percentage increase.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZacW
Member
Avatar
134 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 02, 2012 10:07 |  #47

carshop wrote in post #14936713 (external link)
Ive been a member for 3 years and have never sold a print...I just liked the storage.
But with this increase, Im not renewing.

Just downgrade to the Power or Portfolio level :)

http://www.smugmug.com …s/photo-sharing-features/ (external link)


SmugMug Forum Support Hero
http://www.smugmug.com​/ (external link)
http://help.smugmug.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrfixitx
Senior Member
Avatar
641 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Omaha NE
     
Sep 02, 2012 10:25 |  #48

I have been a power user for a few years and love how easy SmugMug is. I am glad I am not affected by the price hike. That said if I was a working pro selling prints for a profit an extra $10 a month is not a big deal. If I am paying for photoshop, lightroom, redundant storage and the other gazillion expenses pros have to pay $10 a month is a drop in the bucket for a business expense. Especially if you consider the time it would take to migrate away. I just don't see it as a good ROI unless someone is already planning on moving their service somewhere else and just had not pulled the trigger.


Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! - Ansel Adams (external link)
https://brandons-photography.smugmug.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmcguire
Senior Member
273 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 02, 2012 10:57 |  #49

tkbslc wrote in post #14935259 (external link)
Can your 130 dollar external drive stay up 24x7 while serving your pictures to the web? If so, I doubt you'd have the smugmug account.

I am not trying to justify any price increases, but the storage arguments in this thread are hurting my brain. I manage a datacenter and most people have no idea what is involved. The internet bill alone is likely pushing 10k a month. Then there is power, cooling, high salaries of IT pros, server, storage.

Now none of that matters if you can't compete, but again, it's not like buying mac mini and a usb drive and plugging into DSL.

Maybe Smugmug's business model is not sustainable. Maybe they should look into cloud based services instead of managing their own datacenter. If they have 100 employees, then I would think a RIF might be inevitable if costs are getting out of hand.

Smugmug uses Amazon S3 and Amazon's prices have been decreasing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrfixitx
Senior Member
Avatar
641 posts
Gallery: 55 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Omaha NE
     
Sep 02, 2012 11:31 |  #50

mmcguire wrote in post #14937960 (external link)
Smugmug uses Amazon S3 and Amazon's prices have been decreasing.

But have their prices been decreasing faster than user upload volume has increased? With the D800, 5DMk3 etc... and faster internet uploads it wouldn't surprise me if uploads have outpaced S3 price decreases.

The staffing increases for development is probably the biggest expense that contributed to the price increase. Especially since the majority of new features being developed/enhanced are aimed at the pros where the lower user tiers are really not seeing new features added.


Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! - Ansel Adams (external link)
https://brandons-photography.smugmug.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jtalerico
Senior Member
Avatar
487 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh
     
Sep 02, 2012 15:48 |  #51

mrfixitx wrote in post #14938060 (external link)
But have their prices been decreasing faster than user upload volume has increased? With the D800, 5DMk3 etc... and faster internet uploads it wouldn't surprise me if uploads have outpaced S3 price decreases.

The staffing increases for development is probably the biggest expense that contributed to the price increase. Especially since the majority of new features being developed/enhanced are aimed at the pros where the lower user tiers are really not seeing new features added.

Don MacAskill has been saying the same crap about higher MP Sensors... It isn't like EVERY user on Smugmug is shooting a D800 or 5DMk3, he sure as heck would like to make it out that way...

It would be interesting to see how many XT, XTi, 40D, etc are being shot vs the higher end bodies...

Also, they compress with JPEG, so it isn't like RAW images are being sent to them (unless a customer buys their extra service).

I have been with Smugmug for about 3 years now.. This is total crap, they act like the camera sensor is the main reason for the change, however the difference between Business and Portfolio is not based off upload/image size, it just removes the marketing aspects...


Website (external link) 7D | 70-200 2.8 IS L | 10-20 F3.5 SLD | 17-50 F2.8 EX FLD | 580EX II | BG-E7 | Bogen legs & Bogen 3265 Head | ThinkTank UD60 | Lowpro 302AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotteisenphotography
Never been blessed
Avatar
4,147 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Aug 2007
     
Sep 02, 2012 18:50 |  #52

The best part is that they're ignoring the majority of our comments here, and one of the SmugMug staff responded with a nice snarky one above. Further showing how little they really do care about their customers input. I sent them a nice, polite, professional email after hearing about the increase, voiced my frustration, and asked a few questions. They only answered the simplest thing, and ignored/did not respond to any input I had. Sad. PhotoShelter here I come!


2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Csae
Goldmember
Avatar
3,350 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Sep 02, 2012 19:01 |  #53

jtalerico wrote in post #14938926 (external link)
...
I have been with Smugmug for about 3 years now.. This is total crap, they act like the camera sensor is the main reason for the change, however the difference between Business and Portfolio is not based off upload/image size, it just removes the marketing aspects...

And theres nothing really wrong with that to be honest, if you plan on making money of a photo i am shooting for you, it will absolutely cost you more.

Thats all perfectly fine! What isn't, is the amount, the no warning, and the excuses.

And as i've mentioned, if you are gonna pitch that sort of an increase to a business, you can't make a vague promise like more features, it has to be concrete. And for the amount of the increase, it has to be substantial. This isn't a kids game or favors being passed around, you didn't increase your price for 7 years ? tough luck. Doesn't make it right. In fact, that excuse becomes even more useless based on the inflation rate, even if i average it at 2% for 7 years, you'd still only be at a 14% increase in price, a much more reasonable sum.


Feel free to call me Case.
CasePhoto.ca (external link) - FanPage (external link)
-Montreal based Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randomlinh
Senior Member
Avatar
992 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
     
Sep 02, 2012 19:21 |  #54

carshop wrote in post #14936713 (external link)
Ive been a member for 3 years and have never sold a print...I just liked the storage.
But with this increase, Im not renewing.

Any particular reason why? While I don't believe Zac should have responded they way he did (there's no way to convey joking in text, this wasn't the place to try), is there any reason you weren't a power user before?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZacW
Member
Avatar
134 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Sep 02, 2012 19:28 |  #55

scotteisenphotography wrote in post #14939582 (external link)
The best part is that they're ignoring the majority of our comments here, and one of the SmugMug staff responded with a nice snarky one above. Further showing how little they really do care about their customers input. I sent them a nice, polite, professional email after hearing about the increase, voiced my frustration, and asked a few questions. They only answered the simplest thing, and ignored/did not respond to any input I had. Sad. PhotoShelter here I come!

Hi Scott, as you can imagine we've gotten tons of feedback and emails on this over the past couple of days so we really do apologize if we aren't answering every single question you have. I promise that if you private message me directly I will spend some time helping you and even give you a call if you need it.

Standing by!


SmugMug Forum Support Hero
http://www.smugmug.com​/ (external link)
http://help.smugmug.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
divmedic4
Member
235 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 02, 2012 19:44 |  #56

I also am in the situation of having a Pro account but only have 2 sales in the last 2 years via SmugMug. For where I am, I will most likely be downgrading my account until I can do more research.

I do find it interesting that there is such a strong denial that SM may be having financial difficulties. IMO, when the person most associated with a service oriented business and who holds a hefty title (COO) jumps ship there is 1 of 2 things going on. Either the company is sinking and they are getting while the getting is good or there is a serious philosophical difference developing and that person is leaving before the financial difficulties result because of the philosophical differences.


Tom
Canon 7DII, Canon 24-105, Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS, 50 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J_TULLAR
Goldmember
Avatar
3,011 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
     
Sep 02, 2012 22:34 |  #57

Well everyone can voice their opinion with their wallets. If people don't like the price then leave, simple as that. If enough people leave, watch SM change their prices QUICK lol. I don't care either way as I don't use it. But the increase isn't that big of a deal if you make a decent money from it. If you don't then I would definitely leave.


Model Mayhem (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
michaelmm
Hatchling
Avatar
2 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Kentucky
     
Sep 02, 2012 22:44 |  #58

I've been with Smugmug for 8 years. They've never given me cause to leave until now. I was promised to be locked into my rate but not so. My letter doubled my rate adding another $100 a year.

Now I'm motivated to see what other sites are offering, I would not have even thought to stray with a 10-20% jump. I'm sure smugmug will loose many in this poorly executed and poorly marketed move. Incremental increases would have been more palatable and eased users into it. The lost clients would have been minimal.

This was truly ametuer hour with all the marks of greed and short-sightedness. Which will further undermine our confidence in Smugmug for years to come. I would not be surprised to learn they are for sale or bankrupted in the next six months.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lore
Damn I failed the goat
Avatar
2,969 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Sep 03, 2012 08:57 |  #59

shiftonephoto wrote in post #14934910 (external link)
Looking at Zenfolio, yeah its $120 a year to set your own prices ect, but if you want to use their pro lab for prints its $250 a year? or is it that you dont get hit for 12% for using the pro lab if you pay 250?

If thats the case, then it certainly sounds like a much better idea. Minus the fact of moving so many galleries over would be a giant headache.

http://www.zenfolio.co​m …l-features.aspx?loc=en-US (external link)
this compares the differences between premium & premium business, I am happy w/ premium, tho I am low sales, if I were high volume premium would make more sense. I can set my own prices / have client logins, password protected galleries, my own watermarks/logos free of their monikers, etc, which is all 'i' need. Since my 1st year of ordering my referral code is out there 'somewhere' & keeps getting used ;) I've only paid full price the 1st year I had zenfolio... each subsequent year I've either not had to pay for it or very little, which is great for me :D

Zenfolio gives you great ways tools to migrate your photos to your Zenfolio account http://www.zenfolio.co​m/zf/tools/migration.a​spx (external link)

Hope this helps.


Lore
flickr (external link) - Website (external link) - Blography (external link)
"Every photograph tells a story, What's your story?"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbypanda
Goldmember
1,804 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2011
     
Sep 03, 2012 12:35 |  #60

That's very useful Lore, I may give that a try.
I assume your website linked is the zenfolio? It looks nice!

In Regards to Smugmug, is it possible they are trying to change their clientele and go after the higher earning photographers who do a lot of sales and simply get rid of those who don't do many online sales and simply use it for storage or a mere portfolio?

I see a lot of the ppl on this thread who are saying they will leave or are unhappy do not do a lot of sales through the site.... Is there anyone who does a lot of sales through smugmug who is leaving also? I havent seen a ton of complaints of "I do thousands of dollars of sales but I'm sill leaving" or something like that.

These are just questions as I'm noticing a trend it seems on this thread. I am not saying I agree with it, or criticizing anyone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

25,237 views & 0 likes for this thread, 56 members have posted to it.
SmugMug Price Increase
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Paul92
826 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.