v35skyline Goldmember 3,572 posts Likes: 16 Joined Apr 2007 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Sep 23, 2012 11:23 | #1 I have a Lee Foundation + 77mm WA adapter coming with the following filters: X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 23, 2012 12:05 | #2 you can make a reverse GND from the filters you have. 5DII + 6D | 16-35/4.0L IS | Σ35/1.4A | 40/2.8 | Σ85/1.4A | 70-200/2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
v35skyline THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,572 posts Likes: 16 Joined Apr 2007 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Sep 23, 2012 15:03 | #3 ^^^I was going to go with Hi-tech or Lee. X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 23, 2012 15:57 | #4 Bonbridge wrote in post #15031674  you can make a reverse GND from the filters you have. Just do this Lee does not have a reverse GND. That's not quite a reverse GND...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
v35skyline THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,572 posts Likes: 16 Joined Apr 2007 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Sep 23, 2012 16:44 | #5 So if choosing one, opt for the 0.9/3-stop. Got it! X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 23, 2012 19:12 | #6 I use an 0.9 hitech reverse:
I'm not sure if a 4 stop would have been better or not. Maybe it would. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
v35skyline THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,572 posts Likes: 16 Joined Apr 2007 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Sep 23, 2012 19:43 | #7 ^^^So I'm getting the feeling that typically "stronger" is better for reverse GNDs. Does sorta make sense now. X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
LOG IN TO REPLY |
julianhj Junior Member 25 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: UK More info | Sep 23, 2012 23:51 | #8 A shot taken recently with my Hitech 0.9 RG:  Sunset over Findon [explored] by julianhj, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ninhja Senior Member  867 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 24, 2012 00:00 | #9 v35skyline wrote in post #15033148 ^^^So I'm getting the feeling that typically "stronger" is better for reverse GNDs. Does sorta make sense now. Are all the reverse GNDs soft? I don't see any hards. Planning on picking this guy up: http://www.bhphotovideo.com …DRG0_9_4_x_6_Reverse.html I don't think you can have a hard reverse. All reverse grads are an upside down soft gnd. It wouldn't make sense any other way.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
julianhj Junior Member 25 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: UK More info | Sep 24, 2012 00:31 | #10 I think of my RG as 'hard', and you have to be precise with placement. Here's an illustration: http://www.teamworkphoto.com …43cd881fb5206a20896ea7f13
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 24, 2012 04:15 | #11 ninhja wrote in post #15034108 I don't think you can have a hard reverse. All reverse grads are an upside down soft gnd. It wouldn't make sense any other way. Those HiTechs look awesome! great shots everyone! Singh-Ray makes hard reverse GNDs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Stefan01 1265 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
