trueimage Member 205 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Canada More info | Aug 16, 2012 23:15 | #1 any pointers would be great Canon 5D Mark II + grip | Canon 1D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rjx Goldmember ![]() 2,670 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Santa Clara, California More info | Aug 17, 2012 01:22 | #2 To me it looks like a beauty dish, right of the camera. "It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 17, 2012 10:01 | #3 My guess: http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
John Goldmember ![]() 1,405 posts Likes: 34 Joined Oct 2006 More info | Aug 23, 2012 16:07 | #4 nathancarter wrote in post #14870301 ![]() Two or three assistants holding a giant scrim above her to block the direct sunlight, then a relatively soft light source to camera right. Definitely see this. john | gear | web hosting deal for POTN members!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawk911 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Aug 24, 2012 09:59 | #5 aIpha wrote in post #14897888 ![]() Definitely see this. I think two more light sources (aside from scrim/sun). One is closer to the camera set up at a low angle maybe right above the camera and to the right. Unless the catchlight was photoshopped in, you can tell because the catchlight is at the top of the eye but it is not covered by her eyebrow. Small lightsource that's meant to light the shadows a bit. The other looks to be higher up and further to the right. Pointed down. Definitely more pop to this one. What's a little strange to me is how big the hotspot is on her thigh compared to the hotspot on her forehead and cheek and there's no telling what they did in post work either to tame or enhance lighting HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 24, 2012 10:44 | #6 hawk911 wrote in post #14900818 ![]() and there's no telling what they did in post work either to tame or enhance lighting Yeah, I was thinking there had to be a fair amount of post. That hard shadow on her wrist just doesn't fit with the rest of the lighting, http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Erc.Wind Junior Member ![]() 22 posts Joined Apr 2012 More info | Aug 26, 2012 07:45 | #7 I haven't a lot of experiences, but i really like the pic. thank for sharing. Wind, My Flick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenwood33 Goldmember 2,616 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 More info | Sep 03, 2012 17:43 | #8 I agree with your guess. I thin kits a large sized softbox on camera right and the light was feathered. The color of the sky looks fake and was bought back to blue in post, which leads me to believe it shot during a bright sunny day. nathancarter wrote in post #14870301 ![]() My guess: Two or three assistants holding a giant scrim above her to block the direct sunlight, then a relatively soft light source to camera right. Clues: Bright blue sky in the background, so it's daytime and the sun is out. No hard shadows from direct sunlight on her face, chest, or legs = scrim to provide shade from direct sun. Catchlight in her eyes, a bit to the right of the center of her eyes = artificial light source to camera right Soft shadows on the camera-left side of her face, and in the wrinkles on her swimsuit = artificial light source has a softening modifier such as umbrella or beauty dish. The shadow on the ground from her left (camera right) arm gives another clue as to the positioning of the light. However. I can't quite figure out the relatively hard, crisp shadow of the sleeve on her left (camera right) wrist. Perhaps the scrim is feathered to allow just the edge of the direct sun to fall on the near edge of her arm and body? I'm also not good enough yet to differentiate between a beauty dish and am umbrella. The catchlight is too small to help me identify the shape.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mxz600 Member 66 posts Joined Jan 2008 More info | Sep 08, 2012 16:32 | #9 it was lit with photoshop id say What I got: 7D, 17-55f2.8is, 70-200f2.8isMKii, 430exII, 430exII, S100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlesu Goldmember ![]() 4,316 posts Likes: 116 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Midwest More info | Sep 09, 2012 07:44 | #10 Look at the shadow on her wrist. It's crisp. But elsewhere the lighting seems softer. Also check out the size of the reflection on the left from of her jacket. Looks like a large reflector or possibly a scrim that was there to soften flash. But somehow the flash near her wrist was NOT softened. Sloppy. Thanks for stopping in and having a look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picsbyamanda Member ![]() 119 posts Joined Aug 2012 Location: Texas More info | Sep 09, 2012 23:17 | #11 The best way to tell how a photo was lit it by looking at the subject's eyes. They'll reflect how many lights were used and whatnot. So by looking in her eyes I see the reflection of one light source, it looks like there's an umbrella on it and it seems to be to the camera right. It is daytime like someone else mentioned but there are no harsh shadows. So there are probably some assistants holding a couple of diffusers around her.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hawk911 Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Sep 10, 2012 10:08 | #12 I can appreciate dissecting a photo, but with so many digital artists in the industry now, you can guess all you want and surmise the photo was shot one way or another. In reality, I doubt we'd get it 100% accurate. What we can do is try to emulate the photograph/image ourselves and shoot it how we think it should be shot. Catchlights can be added/removed easily enough, as can shadows. HAWK Photography Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jblaschke Goldmember ![]() More info | Sep 20, 2012 14:24 | #13 Absolutely there's a big scrim over her--look at the grass behind. It goes from the same lighting she is under to much brighter farther back. This image was heavily processes to bring all the lighting back to even levels across the board, with the exception of the hard shadow on the wrist as others have noted. Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kfyount Senior Member 821 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Germany More info | Sep 24, 2012 04:03 | #14 Could the sharp shadow on the wrist be from direct (or at least more direct) sunlight hitting there? If the sun was being reflected in, under the scrim from camera right, the light could be "feathered" to bring "just enough" to the face, but the wrist was left in brighter, more direct light. That could also be the reason the bright spot on her thigh is not proportional to the face. Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is abbeyroo 794 guests, 254 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |