Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Oct 2012 (Monday) 11:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Man, full frame: Talk me off the ledge?!

 
vaflower
Senior Member
Avatar
855 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Massachusetts
     
Oct 01, 2012 12:59 |  #16

If you want I would give you an extra push right now. Go with 5d ii and you won't ever regret it.


Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 186
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:08 |  #17

It is very obvious that switching to full frame is a bad idea, and one that you will regret for ages.


Go straight to a large format camera...


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MichSt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,014 posts
Gallery: 71 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Lansing, MI
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:10 |  #18

You have any EF lenses? If so I suggest renting whatever version of the 5D you desire. I think that experience will make your decision crystal clear.


Mario.Q

Canon EOS R

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dexy101
Goldmember
Avatar
2,339 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Likes: 946
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Scotland
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:15 |  #19

You came to the wrong place to be talked out of it. I love my 5dII, I went from t2i or 550d to it, I love it, you will love it, Ive just placed an order for a 70-200 f/2.8 is II and next will be the 5d3.

It's a slippery slope so why bother spending on other items, just go straight to the 5d, you will get one eventually.

Also I'll add, all I had for my first 5d2 was a 50mm 1.8 and I still enjoyed it long enough to get a 24-105 L




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stillinamerica
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Alabama
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:15 |  #20

For now. Get the 17-55mm. It's a lovely lens.

My progression: xsi- 60d- 60d+7d - 60d+5d mk2 -5dmk2x2 - 5dmk3 and a 5d mk2 I will prob never use again.

Don't make the mistake I did when I had just the 60d, I bought the 24-70L because I wanted to be cool. I
Sold it in the end and picked up a 17-55 which is lush.


[CENTER]My Facebook (external link) (please like me) My Website (external link)[/
Canon Gear: 5D Mark3, 16-35L 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L, 50L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,150 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 230
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:18 |  #21

jwp721 wrote in post #15065479 (external link)
If the 2 best lenses you have to use on a full frame right now are the 50 1.8 and the 70-300mmIS 4.5-5.6 then I really think you should consider upgrading your lenses. Besides in a year or so the 5DMKIII will be in the range of where the MkII is right now.

Why put yourself into financial difficulty when you don't have to....

I know I am a downer but then I have seen enough pictures to realize the real magic happens behind the camera.....

I was thinking the same thing. I would find using just those two lenses very limiting. Also, I used to own both, and never really liked either lens.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saintz
Senior Member
428 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:18 |  #22

I sold my 40D and 17-55 and got a 5D. Very happy with the trade.

Do you need the features of the 5D2? You could return your 60D and get a 5D plus glass.


Sony A6000 | 18-55 | 16-50 | 50 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScullenCrossBones
Senior Member
Avatar
842 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Keller, TX
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:21 |  #23

If you stay with the 60d, you will always want a FF.

But if you went FF and couldn't add better glass, you would be better off staying with the 60d as far as better images.

The rental suggestion is a good one though.


:p Gear
Mama done took my Kodachrome away...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
According to the lazy TF, My flatulence rates
Avatar
54,974 posts
Likes: 2158
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:22 |  #24

The Dark Knight wrote in post #15065206 (external link)
Spending an extra $1000, which is what this would cost if I return the 60D and pick up the 5D body only, is already scraping the limit of my budget comfort.

Getting the kit for $2500 would officially fall into the realm of discomfort from a money standpoint....

While there are some advantages to FF, there are also disadvantages. For the above reason unless there is pressing need to go FF, I would just be happy with what you have, or add a new lens if the $$ is burning a hole in your pocket.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Dark ­ Knight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,187 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Apr 2012
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:23 as a reply to  @ MichSt's post |  #25

Thanks for all the opinions, guys.

I think all I can swallow right now is the body only at $1800. It feels stupid not getting the kit considering I'd be getting the 24-105 for basically $300 off, but that extra $700 is a big deal for my budget.

If I do this, I'd also be severely lens challenged. 70-300 non-L and 50mm 1.8 would be my ONLY EF lenses available. My only other lens is the 18-55 IS, pretty much worthless to sell and plus I'd rather keep it on my other crop camera anyways.

I could maybe sell / trade the 70-300 for the 28-135 that probably would give me a more useable focal length for what I shoot, but I feel I won't be making the most out of the FF sensor. And it'll probably be another year before I have the funds to buy a solid lens worthy of the 5D, and by then who knows what prices will be on the 6D.

That being said, to those advocating the 5D Mark II, if the 50mm 1.8 and the 70-300 non-L are the only lenses I can use with that body, would it still be an upgrade?

Again, I could instead use the $1000 extra it would cost me to upgrade the 60D to a 5D on lenses instead- maybe the 24-105L that I could later use on a full frame body...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,360 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 285
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:36 |  #26

I think the 5DII with 50 f/1.8 and 70-300 non-L would be an "upgrade" of sorts, but it would be a "not really worth the money I spent" upgrade. You need to get the right lenses for what you like to shoot to go with the body for it truly to be a worthwhile upgrade. I'd recommend keeping the 60D, and developing an upgrade path that will let you accumulate the EF lenses you'll need/want when you do go full frame.


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
http://www.pbase.com/s​tsva/profile (external link)
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Oct 01, 2012 13:39 |  #27

I wouldn't buy the 28-135 for the 5dmk2. Just saying you might be disappointed.


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lehmanncpa
Goldmember
Avatar
1,943 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Oct 01, 2012 14:10 as a reply to  @ davidc502's post |  #28

Ok, so at first, I recommended to just do it and get the 5D2. Now that you say it may be a year or more before you can get better glass, then maybe you should stick with the 60D and save the $1000 you have. In other words, DON'T get another lens, especially an EF-S lens if you plan to go FF in a year or two.

Enjoy your 60D now. In a year or two (or three or four) you can sell the 60D (or keep it as a backup), plus your saved $1001 ($1 interest on the $1000) and whatever else you've saved from here until then and get a FF with a nice EF combo lens (maybe the 6D or whatever else comes our way from here until then).

Good luck. Either way, you can't go wrong. The 60D is a great camera.


Alex
Gear List
Feedback
Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vaflower
Senior Member
Avatar
855 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Massachusetts
     
Oct 01, 2012 14:14 |  #29

why dont you buy a used 5d2 for 1400- 1450 now and use the saving for a 24 -105. That kit plus 50 1.8 should be enough for you right now


Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dustyporch
Senior Member
398 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
     
Oct 01, 2012 14:16 |  #30

Is the 5DII a better camera than the 60D? Yes.

But the 60D can make any shot that the 5DII can... especially if you will lens-challenged on the 5KII side.

Stay with the 60D. Use your extra money on lenses that WILL make your photos better.


My photos on Flickr... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

6,611 views & 0 likes for this thread
Man, full frame: Talk me off the ledge?!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is achengpics
841 guests, 245 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.