1.

Sam R2


2.
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/68143485@N05/8094211036/

Sam R4


3.
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/68143485@N05/8094211178/

Sam R3


fxdb Member 102 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Idaho More info | Oct 16, 2012 11:34 | #1 1. ![]() Sam R2 ![]() ![]() 2. IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/68143485@N05/8094211036/ ![]() Sam R4 ![]() ![]() 3. IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/68143485@N05/8094211178/ ![]() Sam R3 ![]() ![]() 7d, 100-400L, 17-40L, 24-105L, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 580exii, 430exii, AB 800, reflectors/lightstands/modifiers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Oct 16, 2012 11:38 | #2 Very nice work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jarhed27 Senior Member ![]() 556 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Bluegrass More info | Oct 16, 2012 12:03 | #3 Very well done, really like 2 and 3. Canon 60D, Gripped, a bunch of consumer glass, and a really cheap tripod.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lordshark Member 32 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Oct 16, 2012 12:08 | #4 Nice! Good job
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andrew_T Member 176 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Russia, St.-Petersburg More info | Oct 16, 2012 13:34 | #5 Nice! Really like 2! But I think, light behind could be less bright.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
will227457 Senior Member 261 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Oct 16, 2012 14:41 | #6 Andrew_T wrote in post #15130203 ![]() Nice! Really like 2! But I think, light behind could be less bright. you mean the sun? I'm not so sure the OP can control that aside from picking a diffrent location.....of course im assuming it's the sun
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2012 14:47 | #7 Thanks for the comments. It was a fun shoot. 7d, 100-400L, 17-40L, 24-105L, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 580exii, 430exii, AB 800, reflectors/lightstands/modifiers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Oct 16, 2012 14:59 | #8 will227457 wrote in post #15130437 ![]() you mean the sun? I'm not so sure the OP can control that aside from picking a diffrent location.....of course im assuming it's the sun Sure you can. Faster shutter speed, ND filter, smaller aperture.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 16, 2012 15:11 | #9 These are really nice and I bet she'll be happy with them. The pose in the first seems a bit awkward, but I still like it and yes maybe the 2nd could have been underexposed a tad more, but I still like it as is too. Nice job on them. 6D | 7D MkII | 16-35 f4L | 35 f1.2L II | 135 f2L | 180 f3.5L | 400 f5.6L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ltdave it looks like im post #19,016 ![]() 5,141 posts Gallery: 24 photos Likes: 7164 Joined Apr 2012 Location: the farthest point east in michigan More info | i like them all.... -im just trying. sometimes i succeed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Paul92 770 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |