Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Oct 2012 (Tuesday) 12:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rental Lens for Disney World in Jan.

 
bone11
Member
103 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Oct 16, 2012 18:25 |  #16

I tried to bring the 70-200 2.8 and security said I couldn't take it in the park in case I was paparazzi. Seriously. As I was with the my kids. I questioned the ban and requested a manager. The manager said I would not be allowed to enter the park with that lens. I had to walk back to hotel and meet them inside.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trique ­ Daddi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,094 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Feb 2007
Location: East coast of Florida
     
Oct 16, 2012 18:31 |  #17

For Disney I think tohe 70-200 might be a little long but go with the f4 due to size and weight. The 70-200 range is perfect at SeaWorld. Your 17-50 range will be good for Disney though. Enjoy!


Canon 7DMKII,7D 40D, 20D, CANON 100-400mm IS 4.5/5.6L, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, Kenko Extension Tubes, Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS, 580EX II Flash,Gittos MH 5580 monopod, Thinktank Airport Takeoff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lexar
Senior Member
298 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2012
     
Oct 16, 2012 18:40 |  #18

I went to Epcot in the summer and brought a 15-85 and 55-250.
I had really no need for the 55-250 at all.. took a couple of pics with it since I was carrying it anyhow (thank god its light!!)

The thing I missed was a low light prime. On the Indoor rides the 15-85 was not fast enough. I was even shooting at the wide end at f3.5 and it did not help so a f2.8 would not of been useful either.

Therefore if I were to do it again (I have a crop body) I would bring the 15-85 because of the great range (no need for UWA or Zoom) But also bring a low light prime like a Sigma 30 f1.4 or a Canon 28 etc..
Do not bring a 50mm for crop since it will be way too long indoors.


Canon R7 | RF 18-150 | RF 100-400 | Canon 70D | 15-85IS | Σ17-50/2.8 | Σ30/1.4 | 40/2.8 Pancake | 100/2.0 | 55-250STM | 430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T2iGuy
Member
Avatar
139 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Oct 16, 2012 20:48 |  #19

RPCrowe wrote in post #15131145 (external link)
I'd take a good P&S and have fun with the kids...

+1 just bring a P&S and have some time with the family and like you said this is going to be your first time at Disney World


GEAR: T2i

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mulderxcoltrane
Member
57 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Oct 16, 2012 21:13 as a reply to  @ T2iGuy's post |  #20

I'm looking forward to trying out the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 on an upcoming trip...it's the fastest constant aperture UWA lens (as far as I know).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MMp
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 1083
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Northeast US
     
Oct 16, 2012 21:30 |  #21

My advice is to use the one or two lens that you are most familiar with. Personally, it takes me a good 2-3weeks to get comfortable with a new lens. I wouldn't want to be learning/experimenting with a new piece of equipment on my vacation.


With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group (external link), as an alternate way of maintaining communication with our members and sharing/discussing the hobby.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:06 |  #22

If you really want a longer lens, I'd take a 135L... So much more compact, lightweight and fun than my 70-200.

Personally I'd take a 35 and an 85, unless I was keen to do some urbanscapes (what word should this be!?) in which case I'd bring along the 24TS.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keyan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,319 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Mar 2011
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:19 |  #23

On a crop, the 17-55 can't be beat. You will want to be wider to get your kids and characters, and the f/2.8 will be good in the evening and on the darker areas and rides where a flash might be distracting or banned.

What time of year are you going?

Or take the money and put it towards an S100 since they are on sale now with the S110 coming out, it is a fantastic point and shoot that acts like a pocketable SLR in a lot of ways.


Cameras: 7D2, S100
Lenses: 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, 18-135 STM, 24-70 f/4L IS USM, 50 f/1.4 USM,70-300L IS USM
Other Stuff: 430 EX II, Luma Labs Loop 3, CamRanger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trique ­ Daddi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,094 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Feb 2007
Location: East coast of Florida
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:20 |  #24

For the animal shots you will use something longer than the ultra wides. The 70-200 F4 is not too bulky or heavy or your 50-250mm.


Canon 7DMKII,7D 40D, 20D, CANON 100-400mm IS 4.5/5.6L, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L, Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, Kenko Extension Tubes, Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS, 580EX II Flash,Gittos MH 5580 monopod, Thinktank Airport Takeoff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:31 |  #25

I agree with most of the other folks here. Use smaller lenses. You'll annoy your family and others if you have a big, white lens.

The 24-105L would be a good one to rent, although it won't be as good in dark places.

I took the 18-55 and the 55-250 two years ago. Got some cool shots with both. But next time I won't bother with the longer lens.

This is a mediocre pic, but I show it because that's the best darn food in the park. It's at the Animal Kingdom (I forget the name, but it's pretty much North African and Middle Eastern food). Supposedly there's a long wait time for reservations (days, weeks, or more), but we called ahead and got in and it didn't seem very crowded. The food was really good. Pic was taken with the 18-55 handheld at 1/15.

IMAGE: http://fairmont.smugmug.com/Travel/Disney-World-2010/i-c3kZSvG/0/L/African-Food-L.jpg


This is another 18-55 of the wife and kids. My wife was posing but the other two weren't. My wife was happy to get off her feet and enjoy some wine in "Germany." I love Epcot the most. Little kids aren't as into it.

IMAGE: http://fairmont.smugmug.com/Travel/Disney-World-2010/Italy/1138223853_sipYS-L.jpg


Here's one where a bigger lens might have helped. The Indiana Jones Stunt show at Hollywood Studios. I got invited on stage and was in the entire show from start to finish. It was fun and you could definitely feel the heat of the explosions. This was a warm-up scene in which they get us to overact. I'm one of the three guys yelling in emotional pain as our friend lay dying. I'm the one in the middle with jeans and the headwrap thingy.

IMAGE: http://fairmont.smugmug.com/Travel/Disney-World-2010/i-D2Z7FKM/0/L/IMG1194-L.jpg


Finally, this was in "France" at Epcot (note: There's a pastry shop there that sells Napoleons for five bucks. Totally worth it. Huge and delicious dessert). I found this fake old camera and props (bolted to the ground), bought a beret (made in China) and made my wife take a picture of me looking cool/dorky.

IMAGE: http://fairmont.smugmug.com/Travel/Disney-World-2010/i-jm4NzzL/0/L/Michael-the-Photographer-L.jpg


None of the shots I took with the 55-250 are worth a darn. Mostly family shots with the 18-55, and it was usually set at 18mm.


To get good shots, use a wider angle and get close to your subject. Fill the frame with people. Good memories that way.

Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mulderxcoltrane
Member
57 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:38 |  #26

MikeFairbanks wrote in post #15132182 (external link)
This is a mediocre pic, but I show it because that's the best darn food in the park. It's at the Animal Kingdom (I forget the name, but it's pretty much North African and Middle Eastern food). Supposedly there's a long wait time for reservations (days, weeks, or more), but we called ahead and got in and it didn't seem very crowded. The food was really good. Pic was taken with the 18-55 handheld at 1/15.

QUOTED IMAGE

It's called the Tusker House...and it's kind of a hidden gem...not very tough to get in to (although it used to be when it first opened).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:40 |  #27

IMAGE: http://fairmont.smugmug.com/Other/Archives/i-FJqfbnd/0/M/DSC02938-M.jpg

Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danpass
Goldmember
Avatar
2,134 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Naples, FL
     
Oct 16, 2012 22:59 |  #28

17-55 2.8 IS

otherwise a P&S with wide angle


Dan
Gallery (external link) | Gear/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MingTyhMaa
Member
107 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Oct 16, 2012 23:41 |  #29

Your signature says 1100D, so 17-40 or 16-35 would not offer you a focal length you don't already have. UWA options are Canon 10-22, Sigma 8-16, Tokina 11-16.
Maybe Tokina as you'll be shooting at night, and it's 2.8.


Sony A7II + 24-70 f4 + 55 1.8
Sony A6000 + 8mm fish, 10-18, 55-210
Sony RX100III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MingTyhMaa
Member
107 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Oct 16, 2012 23:42 |  #30

Keyan wrote in post #15132150 (external link)
On a crop, the 17-55 can't be beat. You will want to be wider to get your kids and characters, and the f/2.8 will be good in the evening and on the darker areas and rides where a flash might be distracting or banned.

What time of year are you going?

Or take the money and put it towards an S100 since they are on sale now with the S110 coming out, it is a fantastic point and shoot that acts like a pocketable SLR in a lot of ways.

Someone just posted refurbished S95 from Canon for $178.


Sony A7II + 24-70 f4 + 55 1.8
Sony A6000 + 8mm fish, 10-18, 55-210
Sony RX100III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,728 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Rental Lens for Disney World in Jan.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2468 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.