328iGuy wrote in post #15129242
Ouch...is the TS-E really worth the loss of all the other lenses?
Wouldn't be in my bag, especially the loss of an UWA.
xpfloyd wrote in post #15129346
I wasn't really using the 24-105 anyway plus the 24 ts-e shifted left and right to create a 3 shot pano is roughly the equivalent of 11mm so uwa is covered. Sharpness is different class though
Floyd is right, part of the beauty of the tilt/shift is being able to shift up/down or left/right. 24mm is about perfect for most landscape shots, but if you need to go wide, just shift and merge the photos seemlessly.
The 17-40 is still one of my favorite lenses I own though, they both have their place.