Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 23 Oct 2012 (Tuesday) 23:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

UV filters - Single coated vs Multi coated vs Do I even need one?

 
EOS ­ Man
Happy Lucky 888 EOS
Avatar
645 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Oct 23, 2012 23:44 |  #1

I'm planning to get a 77mm UV filter for my 70-200 IS II, and haven't used filters in years. Do I need one and if yes, should I get the B+W single or multi coated one? Like I said, I don't have much experience with filters since I discovered a 'cheap' Hoya filter was adding haze to my photos; I do have a 72 mm B+W multi-coated UV filter for my 135 mm f2 and it's great because it is almost as if it isn't there (no reduction in brightness, IQ or increase in flare).

Do I save $25 and get the single coated one or spend extra for the multi-coated?


My EOS Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Oct 23, 2012 23:48 |  #2

This is an oft discussed topic, which usually is very polarized. I suggest searching and reading the filter sticky HERE.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS ­ Man
THREAD ­ STARTER
Happy Lucky 888 EOS
Avatar
645 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Oct 24, 2012 00:01 as a reply to  @ Nightdiver13's post |  #3

Great FAQ/thread. I learned that Hoya SHMC/Pro1 filters are cheaper and more effective than B+W ones.

I'm confused about CPL filters though. Do they reduce the amount of light going into the lens (they seem closely related but different compared to ND filters)? I shoot a lot of sports where a CPL might come in handy - outdoor action and horseriding, and indoors for basketball/volleyball where the floor is sometimes glossy and tends to confuse the camera's AF abilities.

Would it be practical/what is the effect of using a CPL full-time on a lens? Seeing it does offer plenty - more saturation, less flare/glare/reflection​s. I'm thinking of getting on in place of using a UV filter


My EOS Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Oct 24, 2012 00:07 |  #4

CPLs are fantastic, but they do decrease the light by up to two stops, depending on how strongly you have the filter set. Even at the zero setting they still decrease light input, but I'm not sure by how much. Enough that it's worth taking off if you're not using it.

Depending on what I'm shooting, I practically live with a CPL on my lenses. If it's an either/or choice, I'd definitely go for a CPL.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Oct 24, 2012 00:09 |  #5

EOS Man wrote in post #15161833 (external link)
(they seem closely related but different compared to ND filters)

Yeah, I see a lot of people treat them as equivalents, but they are very different tools. An ND filter is purely to decrease the amount of light coming into the lens. You already know the benefits of a CPL...


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rendil
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2012
Location: Sacramento
     
Oct 24, 2012 00:47 |  #6

Wait for a used B+W UV MRC to pop up on here, you can get them fairly cheap used usually.


Gear List//Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 24, 2012 11:42 |  #7

Start here: LINK

You should get MRC version of any filter you buy.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS ­ Man
THREAD ­ STARTER
Happy Lucky 888 EOS
Avatar
645 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Oct 24, 2012 12:13 |  #8

Rendil wrote in post #15161940 (external link)
Wait for a used B+W UV MRC to pop up on here, you can get them fairly cheap used usually.

By pure coincidence, I spotted a used (9 condition) 77 mm B+W UV MRC filter on B&H this morning and I picked it up for $41 + $4 shipping. How's that for price? (This is my 2nd used purchase from B&H, I picked up a 9 condition Ultrasharp monitor 2 weeks back and it came with a slightly battered box but everything inside was like brand new!)

Nightdiver13 wrote in post #15161844 (external link)
CPLs are fantastic, but they do decrease the light by up to two stops, depending on how strongly you have the filter set. Even at the zero setting they still decrease light input, but I'm not sure by how much. Enough that it's worth taking off if you're not using it.

Depending on what I'm shooting, I practically live with a CPL on my lenses. If it's an either/or choice, I'd definitely go for a CPL.

Interesting, I've known about CPL filters but never considered having them on an almost full-time basis. I might just pick one up.

ben_r_ wrote in post #15163515 (external link)
Start here: LINK

You should get MRC version of any filter you buy.

Thanks, Neil posted the link earlier in the thread but your one line summary is useful (and confirms my habit/homework that MRC filters are worth the price)


My EOS Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 24, 2012 12:16 |  #9

EOS Man wrote in post #15163634 (external link)
Thanks, Neil posted the link earlier in the thread but your one line summary is useful (and confirms my habit/homework that MRC filters are worth the price)

Less is more :)


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Avatar
2,272 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2010
Location: Bigfoot Country
     
Oct 24, 2012 12:41 |  #10

EOS Man wrote in post #15163634 (external link)
By pure coincidence, I spotted a used (9 condition) 77 mm B+W UV MRC filter on B&H this morning and I picked it up for $41 + $4 shipping. How's that for price?

Nice one. You saved yourself about $25 off the new price, and in my experience B&H is pretty spot on with their used ratings. Probably in like new condition.


Neil

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,296 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
UV filters - Single coated vs Multi coated vs Do I even need one?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Moonraker
647 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.