^^^ Try that with a 5D2.
jdizzle Darth Noink ![]() 69,419 posts Likes: 57 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:00 | #9227 The 5D 3 can't do this either. I borrowed one from a friend and he converted to Nikon.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:04 | #9228 That's what I have heard. A couple of weeks ago I posted a before and after shot in the front yard that was about as eye-popping as far as pulling detail out of shadows. This was a major factor for me since I get a lot of shots like this outdoors and the 5D2 was frustrating in this regard.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevindar Cream of the Crop ![]() 5,050 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2007 Location: california More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:07 | #9229 yeah, for landscape shooting, the new sony sensor is really a game changer. It really is. d800e is simply the best landscape camera available right now, when you consider everything (image quality, portability, lens availability, etc). My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink ![]() 69,419 posts Likes: 57 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:11 | #9230 ^^Hehe! Now match up that sensor with some wide angle Zeiss!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode Cream of the Crop 6,239 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:25 | #9231 I liked the feel of the 5DII but in fact it took me less than a day to embrace the d800.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink ![]() 69,419 posts Likes: 57 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:28 | #9232 kevindar wrote in post #15203954 ![]() yeah, for landscape shooting, the new sony sensor is really a game changer. It really is. d800e is simply the best landscape camera available right now, when you consider everything (image quality, portability, lens availability, etc). Kevin, you'll be impressed with the low light performance as well. jetcode wrote in post #15204003 ![]() I liked the feel of the 5DII but in fact it took me less than a day to embrace the d800. It's hard going back.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead ![]() 4,287 posts Likes: 348 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:31 | #9233 Those examples of DR of the Nikons is really impressive! What ISO do you guys normally shoot at to get such great results? What would be the max ISO you would shoot ar before finding a lot of noise developing? My 5D2 is not so forgiving in extreme shadow lifts, above ISO 400 it gets a bit tricky. Keep in mind I dont shoot those in between ISOs, so it goes 100,200,400,800 etc for me. If that matters. Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:43 | #9234 Tony_Stark wrote in post #15204026 ![]() Those examples of DR of the Nikons is really impressive! What ISO do you guys normally shoot at to get such great results? What would be the max ISO you would shoot ar before finding a lot of noise developing? My 5D2 is not so forgiving in extreme shadow lifts, above ISO 400 it gets a bit tricky. Keep in mind I dont shoot those in between ISOs, so it goes 100,200,400,800 etc for me. If that matters. In good daylight I shoot the D800 at 400, there is just no noise at that level. When I'm shooting birds or indoors without flash 800-3200. I get great results from 400-3200 and rarely go outside that range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink ![]() 69,419 posts Likes: 57 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:44 | #9235 Tony_Stark wrote in post #15204026 ![]() Those examples of DR of the Nikons is really impressive! What ISO do you guys normally shoot at to get such great results? What would be the max ISO you would shoot ar before finding a lot of noise developing? My 5D2 is not so forgiving in extreme shadow lifts, above ISO 400 it gets a bit tricky. Keep in mind I dont shoot those in between ISOs, so it goes 100,200,400,800 etc for me. If that matters. Here's some samples I've posted before with the D600.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead ![]() 4,287 posts Likes: 348 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 03, 2012 22:50 | #9236 K6AZ wrote in post #15204065 ![]() In good daylight I shoot the D800 at 400, there is just no noise at that level. When I'm shooting birds or indoors without flash 800-3200. I get great results from 400-3200 and rarely go outside that range. So you can get nice, relatively clean lifted shadows from 400-3200? Thats very encouraging jdizzle wrote in post #15204067 ![]() Here's some samples I've posted before with the D600. https://photography-on-the.net …?p=15088493&postcount=464 https://photography-on-the.net …?p=15089798&postcount=465 ISO samples SOOC. Pay close attention to the last shot at 25600. ![]() https://photography-on-the.net …?p=15081274&postcount=421 If you really want my honest opinion, I'll take Image Quality over Ergonomics any day. ![]() Not helping man Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 03, 2012 23:03 | #9237 Tony_Stark wrote in post #15204090 ![]() So you can get nice, relatively clean lifted shadows from 400-3200? Thats very encouraging ![]() ![]() Most of the time my shots that need detail pulled out of shadows are ISO 400, it's usually because I'm outdoors in daylight, I have had good luck pulling shadows out of ISO 1600-3200 shots as well, noise isn't much of a problem on the D800 up to 3200 and if pulling detail out of shadows shows some noise it is easily dealt with in ACR.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead ![]() 4,287 posts Likes: 348 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 03, 2012 23:18 | #9238 K6AZ wrote in post #15204126 ![]() Most of the time my shots that need detail pulled out of shadows are ISO 400, it's usually because I'm outdoors in daylight, I have had good luck pulling shadows out of ISO 1600-3200 shots as well, noise isn't much of a problem on the D800 up to 3200 and if pulling detail out of shadows shows some noise it is easily dealt with in ACR. Perfect, the answer I was looking for Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Nov 03, 2012 23:20 | #9239 FWIW I do believe the D600 is a little better for noise too so that might be your ticket.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony_Stark Shellhead ![]() 4,287 posts Likes: 348 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Nov 03, 2012 23:30 | #9240 K6AZ wrote in post #15204185 ![]() FWIW I do believe the D600 is a little better for noise too so that might be your ticket. I honestly prefer to save a little more and go for the D800/E. The D600 is just way too small of a camera for me to use it as a primary camera. Nikon D810 | 24-70/2.8G | 58/1.4G
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Alfie# 634 guests, 268 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |