Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 30 Oct 2012 (Tuesday) 21:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Amanda And Mike - Wedding Ceremony

 
ventureon
Member
173 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: USA
     
Oct 31, 2012 19:44 |  #16
bannedPermanent ban

great job, what were the first two shot with?


www.facebook.com/ventu​reonphoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
71sbeetle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,462 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 714
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Oct 31, 2012 20:22 |  #17

ventureon wrote in post #15192572 (external link)
great job, what were the first two shot with?

Thanks :)
If my memory serves me right, both were shot with my 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II


gareymartin.com (external link)
flickr (external link)
gear list | CPS.
Feedback:
eBay (external link) | POTN
VWVortex (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dawssvt
Senior Member
Avatar
406 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Oct 2009
     
Nov 06, 2012 00:45 |  #18

A little too much fill flash for me! Was it too dark to just crank up the ISO?


St. Louis, MO Portrait and Wedding Photographer (external link)
My Smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
71sbeetle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,462 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 714
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Nov 11, 2012 20:19 |  #19

dawssvt wrote in post #15212539 (external link)
A little too much fill flash for me! Was it too dark to just crank up the ISO?

Yes actually it was almost pitch dark, they had some string lights about 25-30ft behind us which was the only light we had, I even had to use a flashlight to illuminate the subjects in order to focus lol, wedding wasn't supposed to go that late but everything started late and then was rushed.


gareymartin.com (external link)
flickr (external link)
gear list | CPS.
Feedback:
eBay (external link) | POTN
VWVortex (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 84
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Nov 11, 2012 21:02 |  #20

I would have preferred the shots near the brick wall to use a shallower DOF.

Weakening the flash might have allowed you to use 2.8 or 4.0 at the same shutter speed.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
71sbeetle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,462 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 714
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Nov 11, 2012 21:06 |  #21

mclaren777 wrote in post #15234827 (external link)
I would have preferred the shots near the brick wall to use a shallower DOF.

Weakening the flash might have allowed you to use 2.8 or 4.0 at the same shutter speed.

I see what you mean now that I am looking at it lol, I had set f/8 because I wanted to make sure I got everyone in focus but since they were about 12-15ft from the wall I guess I could have used f/4 and I would have been fine, thanks for pointing that out :)


gareymartin.com (external link)
flickr (external link)
gear list | CPS.
Feedback:
eBay (external link) | POTN
VWVortex (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,852 views & 0 likes for this thread
Amanda And Mike - Wedding Ceremony
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is razorblaydes_jk
900 guests, 347 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.