Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 07 Nov 2012 (Wednesday) 09:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

24-105 or 17-55?

 
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Nov 07, 2012 19:07 |  #31

Personally I think the 5D + 24-105 would be a great combo if the 24-105 was great.

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1244485

My post is number 15.

I think my 24-105 is for sale. I have no doubt that of all my lenses (17-55, 70-200, TSE24 ii, 100 macro, and 24-105) it is the least sharp.

Shooting an oil painting from a tripod with all the precautions, my 30D + 17-55 easily outperformed the 5DII + 24-105. It was embarrassing for the 24-105.

Glenn


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
oklaiss
Senior Member
471 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Nov 07, 2012 19:09 |  #32

I use my 24-105 as a general purpose lens on my 60D and I find it great for that purpose. Sometimes I wish I had something slightly wider but I make do. 105@f/4 is fantastic for portraits.


5D Mark II Gripped, 60D Gripped, 450D, 24-105 f/4L, 85 1.8, 70-200 f/4L IS, Nifty Fifty, 28 1.8, B+W/Lee/Cokin/Hitech filters, 430ex II x2
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ceriltheblade
Goldmember
2,481 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2007
Location: middle east
     
Nov 08, 2012 00:43 |  #33

I understand that you made your decision - but I would have to say that because of the focal length I took the 24-105 as opposed to the 17-55. I understand that I lose the f2.8 - but for me - the focal length was the most important.

Well, that - and it was a big step up from my previous lens and I could find it reasonably price used in my area.... but you get the point... :)


7D/5dIII
50 1.8 II, MP-E65, 85 II, 100 IS
8-15 FE, 10-22, 16-35 IS, 24-105, 70-200 f4IS, 100-400 ii, tamron 28-75 2.8
600 ex-rt, 055xproB/488rc2/Sirui k40x, kenko extens tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kent ­ andersen
Goldmember
1,071 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Norway, Kristiansand
     
Nov 08, 2012 00:54 |  #34

For my use a 15-85mm paired with a prime, was the best. 15-85 for everyday use, the prime for the occacions where IQ, low light and DOF was important.

A 24-105 is a great walk around, and combined with a Prime you have all you need.


Living in Austria, I am so glad that there is stuff like Gimp out there...
I am a happy giver, so if you find any misspelling in my text, you can keep them... :)
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/41388512@N05/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jodelak
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,463 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver Canada
     
Nov 13, 2012 10:14 |  #35

Peter, I strongly suggest buy the 3, and if you are not happy with any one of them, you can give it to me :D. Joking aside, I think all are 3 excellent lenses, either one is a good buy.


... does it really matter?i see with my eyes, i shoot with my fingers.
My Flickr Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,064 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 2720
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Nov 13, 2012 10:22 |  #36

I had a 17-50 and now I have the 24-105...

Before with 17-50 I wish I had longer 75% of the time
now with the 24-105 I wish I had wider 10% of the time

it works out to my favor as a walk around lens more to have the longer reach. I'm mainly in the 40-85mm range on a crop which is why I know for a fact that a full frame camera and 70-200 would be a solid solid setup for me!


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lexar
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
     
Nov 13, 2012 14:01 |  #37

District_History_Fan wrote in post #15219707 (external link)
15-85 is a great zoom range for crop cameras. If the lens was a constant f/4 aperture one would have been in my bag the day they hit the dealer shelves.

Until about 55 you are within 1/2 of a stop from f4.

I believe from 55-85 you are at f5-5.6.
I don't think that it would make that much of a difference... if its too dark for f5.6 is will likely be too dark for f4.

The range between 85-105 is minimal (a small crop will get you that if you want).
However because you are down to 15mm the benefit of not carrying, and saving money, on a UWA is huge.


Canon 70D | 15-85IS | Σ17-50/2.8 | Σ30/1.4 | 40/2.8 Pancake | 100/2.0 | 55-250STM | 430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Daphatty
Senior Member
490 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2012
     
Nov 13, 2012 14:13 |  #38

I was in love with the 24-105 until I used the 17-55. The ability to hand hold shots in low light really shines with the 17-55. I'd recommend both, to be honest, but I am certain that is not in the budget for most people.


Canon 5D III | EF 24-105mm f/4L IS | EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | EF 40mm f/2.8
Nest NT-6295c Tripod | Bendo IB2 Ballhead

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BB ­ Snapshots
Goldmember
Avatar
1,804 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 612
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Nov 13, 2012 14:28 |  #39

Motor On wrote in post #15218301 (external link)
As you already have a 10-22; get the 24-105, it'll move with you if you decide to go full frame and you can move to the 10-22 if the 24 isn't wide enough.

^^ This.

If not - I choose the 15-85mm over the 24-105 and 17-55 - IQ is excellent, it's cheaper, and lighter.


Brian Buckler
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Brian Buckler Photography (external link) | Like my page on Facebook! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peter2516
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,284 posts
Gallery: 945 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 23718
Joined Oct 2010
Location: State of Washington
     
Nov 14, 2012 12:19 |  #40

Thanks everyone for the inputs I appreciate it. I went with 24-105mm due to my desire of going full frame in the future.

Thanks again


Peter
http://www.flickriver.​com/photos/peterbangay​an (external link)
EOS 5D Mark IV, 1Dx1, 7D Mark I & II/Canon T2i Gripped/EF 500mm f/4L IS USM MK1 / EF70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM / EF100 -400 f4.5-5.6L USM/ EFS 10-22mm/EFS 17-55mm/EFS 18-200mm/Canon 1.4x II/Canon 2x III/ 430EXII / 580EXII.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JRET
Senior Member
261 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Nov 14, 2012 16:03 as a reply to  @ Peter2516's post |  #41

good choice


Canon 6D | 50D | EOS M1 | EOS M2 | S-90 | EF 28 f/2.8 IS | EF 40 f/2.8 | EF 50 f/1.4 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 100 f/2.8 macro | EF 24-105 f/4L IS | EF 70-200 f/4L IS | EF-M 22 | EF-M 11-22 | EF-M 18-55 | EF-M 55-200

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marcial4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 1851
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
     
Nov 14, 2012 17:35 |  #42

with a crop body 17-55 all the way. Different case if you have the 10-22, then the 24-105 have sense and you can use it when upgrade to FF.


Marcial "Marshall" Quintero
5D3 | 16-35/4L | 50 1.4 | 100L | 70-300L

A Venezuelan living in Santiago, Chile

500px (external link) Instagram (external link) flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dj ­ R
Goldmember
Avatar
2,976 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 124
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Philaburbia
     
Nov 14, 2012 21:56 |  #43

When I had a 7d I traded a 17-55 for 24-105 and never looked back.


BAG Reviews, master list!
A7RIII, A7III, D850
All the best glass

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,137 views & 0 likes for this thread
24-105 or 17-55?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is charleslvajr
930 guests, 369 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.