Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
Thread started 25 Oct 2012 (Thursday) 19:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3?!?!??!

 
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,108 posts
Gallery: 409 photos
Likes: 1793
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Oct 25, 2012 19:26 |  #1

http://www.canonrumors​.com …nt-tamron-150-600-f5-6-3/ (external link)

Rival for the 150-500/50-500 OS apparently..

if it gets VC and USD then.. well this might be a very good alternative, Tamrons made some great lenses lately...


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
996gt2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,045 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cincinnati
     
Oct 25, 2012 20:28 |  #2

KenjiS wrote in post #15169743 (external link)
http://www.canonrumors​.com …nt-tamron-150-600-f5-6-3/ (external link)

Rival for the 150-500/50-500 OS apparently..

if it gets VC and USD then.. well this might be a very good alternative, Tamrons made some great lenses lately...

Sigma 50-500 OS HSM is 22 elements in 6 groups and 150-500 OS HSM is 21 elements in 15 groups. The Tamron is 18 elements in 13 groups.

While the # of elements doesn't tell the whole story behind lens performance, it seems like many of the recently introduced high performance telephoto zooms are quite compliacted designs (e.g. the Canon 70-200 II with 23 elements in 19 groups).


Buy/Sell Feedback
5Dc, 50D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crbeveri
Member
212 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: All around the world...
     
Oct 25, 2012 23:29 |  #3

My only complaint is the 6.3 aperture at 500mm. I am personally waiting to see the official price mark of the 200-400 f/4 1.4x from Canon. With a 1D4's high ISO performance it to me becomes easily a great sport lens even for night shots and then a good wildlife lens during the day.


I shoot a little black box with a round thingy ma-giggy in the front.
The gear list (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,108 posts
Gallery: 409 photos
Likes: 1793
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Oct 25, 2012 23:57 |  #4

crbeveri wrote in post #15170504 (external link)
My only complaint is the 6.3 aperture at 500mm. I am personally waiting to see the official price mark of the 200-400 f/4 1.4x from Canon. With a 1D4's high ISO performance it to me becomes easily a great sport lens even for night shots and then a good wildlife lens during the day.

1. its 600mm, Not 500mm

2. its likely going to be $1500 or less not $10,000+


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crbeveri
Member
212 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: All around the world...
     
Oct 26, 2012 00:34 |  #5

KenjiS wrote in post #15170570 (external link)
1. its 600mm, Not 500mm

2. its likely going to be $1500 or less not $10,000+

That's my fault for miss reading the 600 >.< my apologizes

Even still at 600mm f/6.3... I'd gladly pay a few grand more for it to be f/5-5.6 or even fixed f/5.6. I do believe that the new version II lenses from canon are priced high but for what I shoot I do need speed. Hell... I think the new 400 f/2.8 II from canon is crazy priced when the 500mm f/4 is cheaper and if shooting with the 1Dx you need the 500 as the 400 is too short on a FF sensor but that's just my opinion.


I shoot a little black box with a round thingy ma-giggy in the front.
The gear list (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Oct 26, 2012 05:59 |  #6

KenjiS wrote in post #15170570 (external link)
1. its 600mm, Not 500mm

2. its likely going to be $1500 or less not $10,000+

I could use 600mm
I would take a look if it's sharp and only $1500




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,108 posts
Gallery: 409 photos
Likes: 1793
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Oct 26, 2012 20:48 |  #7

^- indeed... Heres hoping Tamron makes this a winner! Could be a great hiking lens


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lazer-jock
Don't mess
Avatar
1,557 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
     
Nov 01, 2012 18:32 |  #8

Nature, airshows, and the list of things that I would use it for grows and grows...


I'm off lining my cage with newspaper.
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
Avatar
2,221 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Dec 2008
Location: a giant bucket
     
Nov 07, 2012 10:55 |  #9

996gt2 wrote in post #15169940 (external link)
Sigma 50-500 OS HSM is 22 elements in 6 groups and 150-500 OS HSM is 21 elements in 15 groups. The Tamron is 18 elements in 13 groups.

While the # of elements doesn't tell the whole story behind lens performance, it seems like many of the recently introduced high performance telephoto zooms are quite compliacted designs (e.g. the Canon 70-200 II with 23 elements in 19 groups).

Definitely depends on the design and the amount of special elements that are used too, though.

Canon's 100-400mm is extremely sharp, prime sharp at the 400mm end with a good copy. It uses 18 elements.

Guess it depends on what price point Tamron is targeting. Hopefully it'll be about a $1500 lens and will have an AF limiter and super fast AF.


amanathia.zenfolio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
996gt2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,045 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cincinnati
     
Nov 07, 2012 12:32 |  #10

woos wrote in post #15218116 (external link)
Definitely depends on the design and the amount of special elements that are used too, though.

Canon's 100-400mm is extremely sharp, prime sharp at the 400mm end with a good copy. It uses 18 elements.

Guess it depends on what price point Tamron is targeting. Hopefully it'll be about a $1500 lens and will have an AF limiter and super fast AF.

Yes, but the 100-400mm is also an old lens design dating back to 1998. If Canon introduced a 100-400 II and targeted high optical performance, you can bet it would have more than 20 elements in it. The fact that the Tamron has a comparatively simpler design (for a 2012 lens) doesn't lead me to have high hopes for its optical performance at 500mm. But who knows, maybe they can pull off something unexpected.


Buy/Sell Feedback
5Dc, 50D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,108 posts
Gallery: 409 photos
Likes: 1793
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Nov 07, 2012 21:43 |  #11

996gt2 wrote in post #15218465 (external link)
Yes, but the 100-400mm is also an old lens design dating back to 1998. If Canon introduced a 100-400 II and targeted high optical performance, you can bet it would have more than 20 elements in it. The fact that the Tamron has a comparatively simpler design (for a 2012 lens) doesn't lead me to have high hopes for its optical performance at 500mm. But who knows, maybe they can pull off something unexpected.

Maybe, or they might use some of their more advanced glass in it... better coatings too

Even the 50-500 OS which is very good isnt quite as good as the 100-400


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
996gt2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,045 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cincinnati
     
Nov 07, 2012 23:17 |  #12

KenjiS wrote in post #15220423 (external link)
Maybe, or they might use some of their more advanced glass in it... better coatings too

Even the 50-500 OS which is very good isnt quite as good as the 100-400

10x zoom that goes to 500mm vs a 4x zoom that goes to 400mm...not really apples to apples there.


Buy/Sell Feedback
5Dc, 50D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,108 posts
Gallery: 409 photos
Likes: 1793
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Nov 08, 2012 01:04 |  #13

996gt2 wrote in post #15220682 (external link)
10x zoom that goes to 500mm vs a 4x zoom that goes to 400mm...not really apples to apples there.

Its quite close, and far better than either copy of the 150-500 i had


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
Avatar
2,221 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Dec 2008
Location: a giant bucket
     
Nov 17, 2012 18:32 |  #14

KenjiS wrote in post #15220878 (external link)
Its quite close, and far better than either copy of the 150-500 i had

Indeed, lol. The 50-500mm OS is, in my experience, WAY better than the 150-500mm. It's really quite close to the 100-400mm.

The "new" Tamron starts at 150mm, instead of the 100mm of the Canon 100-400mm, 80mm of the Nikon 100-400mm, or 50mm instead of the Sigma 50-500mm. I think that will be its main competition. The Tamron supposedly has 4 special elements in it, compared to the Sigma's 3 (or cheaper sigma's 2).. (or maybe 4 and 3, I forget!) Who knows.

Tamron is probably trading something for it though, like crazy high vignetting or something.

I wanna see a new Sigma product in that range, with a focus limiter and FLD glass.


amanathia.zenfolio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,108 posts
Gallery: 409 photos
Likes: 1793
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Nov 17, 2012 18:41 |  #15

^- Hmn, Trading vignetting might not be a horrible tradeoff if you think about it... On a 7D the vignetting wouldnt be a big deal..

Yes it would suck on FF but I'm thinking along the lines of "most wildlife folks in this price range stick crop"


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

9,102 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3?!?!??!
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is PhotosByLena
453 guests, 383 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.