
I used the term usually mentioned "gearheads."
I agree, it works for me.
Lowner "I'm the original idiot" ![]() 12,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Salisbury, UK. More info | Nov 20, 2012 13:19 | #31 gonzogolf wrote in post #15264854 ![]() I used the term usually mentioned "gearheads." I agree, it works for me. Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
professorman Goldmember ![]() 1,661 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2009 Location: VA More info | Nov 20, 2012 13:25 | #32 Ha, yesterday, a guy in my office, who owns a T2i; told me that he wants a Nikon from black friday deals. I said "Okay"... He proceeded to explain how horrible Canon colors are, and Nikon is just incredible for the reds. Then he procceded to explain about DxO ratings and how Nikon has high ratings. I just kept saying "okay, okay, okay". Gosh.... MyGear | Feedback | facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
banquetbear Goldmember ![]() More info | Nov 20, 2012 17:15 | #33 klimraamkosie wrote in post #15268465 ![]() No not really. I guess it's the artsy person vs. technical person. I'm looking for a word for the technical person. Not that they don't know how to take photos but they're interested in the tech as well as the photography. ...yeah, yes really. Its possible to be a technical person and love taking photos more than the gear. You didn't ask for the name of a "technical person." You asked for the name of someone who values gear above taking photos. Can you show any examples of anyone who self-identifies as such? The answer you are looking for is inherently insulting as you can see from the answers that people are giving you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2012 17:34 | #34 banquetbear wrote in post #15269508 ![]() ...yeah, yes really. Its possible to be a technical person and love taking photos more than the gear. You didn't ask for the name of a "technical person." You asked for the name of someone who values gear above taking photos. Can you show any examples of anyone who self-identifies as such? The answer you are looking for is inherently insulting as you can see from the answers that people are giving you. That's your take. There are many people who love their cars more than racing their cars. But that could be an art form. Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
banquetbear Goldmember ![]() More info | Nov 20, 2012 17:41 | #35 klimraamkosie wrote in post #15269577 ![]() That's your take. There are many people who love their cars more than racing their cars. But that could be an art form. But we aren't talking about cars: we are talking about photographers. Where are these photographers who self identify that they love gear more than taking photos? And yes I did ask for the colloquial name of a technical person. Just not at first. I restated what I meant. Is that not allowed? ...just reread the thread and you haven't retracted your initial request. Do you want to retract it now?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2012 19:20 | #36 banquetbear wrote in post #15269611 ![]() But we aren't talking about cars: we are talking about photographers. Where are these photographers who self identify that they love gear more than taking photos? I know we aren't talking about cars. Did I say we weren't or did I give an analogy to strengthen my point? I think the latter. Please reread it if you didn't understand the first time with this understanding. banquetbear wrote in post #15269611 ![]() ...just reread the thread and you haven't retracted your initial request. Do you want to retract it now? And I'm not going to either. It stands. Reread the initial post (which I haven't edited) again. Not just the first sentence. Also read what I said later, it does soften the context for people who choose to be offended. I'm sorry that didn't work for you. Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
birdfromboat Goldmember ![]() 1,839 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 Location: somewhere in Oregon trying to keep this laptop dry More info | Nov 20, 2012 19:36 | #37 wow. Is there a name for people that like to post without adding anything to the discussion more than they like taking pictures? 5D, 10D, G10, the required 100 macro, 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8, 300 f2.8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
banquetbear Goldmember ![]() More info | Nov 20, 2012 19:41 | #38 klimraamkosie wrote in post #15270012 ![]() I know we aren't talking about cars. Did I say we weren't or did I give an analogy to strengthen my point? I think the latter. Please reread it if you didn't understand the first time with this understanding. ...but the analogy doesn't work unless you can produce photographers who value gear over photography. I ask again: where are these photographers? You can't just say "oh look over there car people!" Its your assertion, can you back it up? And I'm not going to either. It stands. Reread the initial post (which I haven't edited) again. Not just the first sentence. Also read what I said later, it does soften the context for people who choose to be offended. I'm sorry that didn't work for you. If you don't see my real intent at this point I don't think you will. All you've done is provided a sounding board for people to throw insults at people who happen to be "gearheads." So far we've had "posers" and "Atgani" and "Fauxtographer" and "Ricers." Last I heard being called a poser was an insult. As I asked before: the word you are looking for would be would be inherently insulting: is that the sort of word you were looking for?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
giggle Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined Nov 2012 More info | Nov 20, 2012 19:50 | #39 klimraamkosie wrote in post #15264502 ![]() Someone who values gear above taking photos. I love gear myself. So maybe not that that extreme. And please leave the "idiot" or "noobies" comments behind. Is there any actual word? The love of cameras is camerotica.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2012 20:35 | #40 i like that. If you use a strap is that practicing safe camera? Stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Tanker Goldmember ![]() 4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | Nov 20, 2012 20:48 | #41 peeaanuut wrote in post #15270306 ![]() i like that. If you use a strap is that practicing safe camera? No..that's P, S&M. Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RAW RAW RAW Senior Member 461 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Tasmania More info | Nov 20, 2012 22:54 | #42 I thought that's exactly what a "gearhead" is. Roughly speaking, someone who appreciates photographic equipment for what it is and how it is constructed and how it performs and who is often a bit obsessed with gear, sometimes to the point of spending a bit much money on it. And this bit is important....being a gearhead is IRRESPECTIVE of photographic ability.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2012 22:58 | #43 RAW RAW RAW wrote in post #15270805 ![]() I thought that's exactly what a "gearhead" is. Roughly speaking, someone who appreciates photographic equipment for what it is and how it is constructed and how it performs and who is often a bit obsessed with gear, sometimes to the point of spending a bit much money on it. And this bit is important....being a gearhead is IRRESPECTIVE of photographic ability. Have I got that about right? Just about. Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
facedodge Goldmember ![]() 1,193 posts Likes: 21 Joined Feb 2012 Location: Silver Spring, MD (DC Suburb) More info | Nov 20, 2012 22:58 | #44 How about "gear-tog" or "gear-tographer" Gear List | Feedback | facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RAW RAW RAW Senior Member 461 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Tasmania More info | Nov 20, 2012 23:01 | #45 Crap......what I forgot to put in my post above is that I have seen the term gearhead millions of times on here and other places and it seems to describe pretty much exactly what the OP was talking about.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1836 guests, 88 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |