Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 28 Apr 2010 (Wednesday) 11:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

photography's longest long-exposure ever taken

 
cccc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,017 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 174
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Apr 28, 2010 14:19 |  #16

tiger roach wrote in post #10083241 (external link)
Cool.

I'm gonna go for 7 months and steal his thunder. :twisted:

6 months and a day should do.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IVIax
Goldmember
Avatar
1,141 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Metro DC, USA
     
Apr 28, 2010 14:22 as a reply to  @ cccc's post |  #17

Don't forget to leave the "reduce long-exposure noise" turned on :lol:


-Max
"Bad artists copy. Good artists steal." Picasso

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KCY
Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF
Avatar
7,170 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2009
Location: I wish I knew...
     
Apr 28, 2010 15:00 |  #18

IVIax wrote in post #10083621 (external link)
Don't forget to leave the "reduce long-exposure noise" turned on :lol:

bw!:lol::lol:


KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
My Gear|My Smugmug (external link)|Pong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Leonid ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cupertino, CA
     
Apr 28, 2010 15:42 |  #19

pretty cool, My sister did one for her photo class in high school for 4 months in our backyard. It came out pretty interesting because some of the stuff was moved and you got to see it shift and star trails were cool also.


Canon 6D, Canon 50mm 1.8 STM
YN568-II, YN560-III, YN460
Feedback: Search for Leonid Photography, and EM2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Apr 28, 2010 18:29 |  #20

IVIax wrote in post #10082881 (external link)
...B&W Makes a 20 stop astro-photographic filter...

They did, but it's no longer available. Their current darkest is 10 stops.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paradiddleluke
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,594 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Apr 28, 2010 23:21 |  #21

man, 30 stops haha thats pretty crazy, but do-able! don't take my word though I don't want to be liable for any fried sensors/processors


Website (external link) | Chicago Actor Headshots (external link) | Gear | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | 500px (external link) | Youtube (external link) | Facebook (external link)
- Luke S -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natalieerachel
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NYC
     
Nov 20, 2012 00:49 |  #22

Wow, old post but I did this same experiment but my exposure was only 25 days long. It doesn't look as great as that first photo, but hey, for a first try I think it looks pretty cool:

http://www.lomography.​com …l/popular/photo​s/13316838 (external link)


NatalieFong.com (external link)
Facebook.com/NatalieRF​ongPhotography (external link)
Flickr.com/photos/Nata​lieFongPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Nov 20, 2012 13:56 |  #23

I might have to try this. Looks like an interesting project.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natalieerachel
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NYC
     
Nov 20, 2012 21:25 |  #24

@luckless It's actually a great project, and no developing chemicals are needed. Just a canister, foil, needle and some photo paper!

I just moved so I'm planning to set some new ones up!


NatalieFong.com (external link)
Facebook.com/NatalieRF​ongPhotography (external link)
Flickr.com/photos/Nata​lieFongPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Riles
Senior Member
306 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Boston, MA
     
Nov 20, 2012 21:41 |  #25

Not for people who chimp their way to proper exposures. :p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Nov 21, 2012 08:45 |  #26

natalieerachel wrote in post #15270495 (external link)
@luckless It's actually a great project, and no developing chemicals are needed. Just a canister, foil, needle and some photo paper!

I just moved so I'm planning to set some new ones up!

wait, no developing chemicals? What kind of paper is used, and how do you stop it from being photo reactive? If there are no potentially hazardous chemicals to play with, then I don't know if I'm all that interested in it anymore...


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iowajim
Senior Member
Avatar
518 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 54
Joined Mar 2011
Location: North Central Iowa
     
Nov 21, 2012 08:48 |  #27

Meh. Looks a little grainy.


Jim, in Iowa
80D / T2i / Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 / Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 / Canon 24-105 f4 / Tamron SP VC 70-200mm f2.8 / Sigma 150-600mm C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natalieerachel
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2012
Location: NYC
     
Nov 21, 2012 17:02 |  #28

Haha no it doesn't require chemicals. I'm not sure why but I guess after a certain time and amount of exposure, the paper doesn't need to be developed. I used Ultrafine VC Elite Black and White Photo Paper.

@iowajim It's a DIY pinhole camera, it's inevitable haha


NatalieFong.com (external link)
Facebook.com/NatalieRF​ongPhotography (external link)
Flickr.com/photos/Nata​lieFongPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Nov 21, 2012 17:28 as a reply to  @ natalieerachel's post |  #29

I think another one was even longer for over 34-months period, also bit more fun:

http://www.neatorama.c​om …e-history-of-photography/ (external link)

IMAGE: http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/longest-exposure.jpg

Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
birdfromboat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in Oregon trying to keep this laptop dry
     
Nov 21, 2012 21:36 |  #30

unencumbered by the thought process- Would it be possible to just make a pinhole in a body cap?

I was told long ago about a japanese movie maker that needed images of familiar places with no people present or traffic, so the images were collected by using pinhole cameras. Longer exposures (smaller holes) for busier places, shorter exposures where there wasn't that much going on or the traffic wasn't as consistant so it didn't leave ghost trails on the image like a thousand cars passing in the exact same lane. I have played with pinholes alot but the results are generally only interesting in a technical way and usually flared or made useless by a slight movement of the camera during exposure,
it is harder than it sounds by a long shot.

that said, now I wonder about drilling a pinhole in a body cap. Does anyone have a reason that it wouldn't work?


5D, 10D, G10, the required 100 macro, 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8, 300 f2.8)
Looking through a glass un-yun

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,921 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it.
photography's longest long-exposure ever taken
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1256 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.