dave_bass5 wrote in post #15244856
I found even going from 17mm to 15mm on my 60D made a difference so i think 16mm wider will be quite a big difference.
what are all those figures about in the second paragraph? Where does the 16mm difference come from. 50 - 28 is 22mm, thats quite a difference.
I do agree that 40 and 50 are a bit too close. I know each lens can have its uses but id go for at least 35 or lower to make a real difference.
My bad, what i meant is that i want to buy the 28mm, but can't afford it, so i'm thinking of buying the 40mm.
50mm = 80mm
40mm = 64mm
28mm = 45mm
So, my shortest focal in the bag now is 80mm (50mm 1.4, not counting the fisheye) and it would be a huge ifference if i bought the 28mm which is 45mm, then i would do a jump from 80mm to 45mm.. but since i can't afford it, would the 40mm (64mm) make a huge difference from 50 to 40?
Sorry if i can't explain any better..