So I have a question and it's probably not a fair match up. I have a need for a macro lens and I found the 100mm 2.8L and was impressed with the quality of close up photos. But if I'm going to spend that much money why can't I just double it and get the 70-200?
I don't know if the macro lens has some special feature for close up photos, but I can't believe the 70-200 couldn't do the same thing right?
Could an expert please explain why any lens couldn't technically be a "macro" lens?
Thanks for your time