Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 03 Jan 2013 (Thursday) 05:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Family Wedding Rates?

 
cookiejay
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 67
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Nottingham, UK
     
Jan 03, 2013 05:25 |  #1

Hi All and a Happy New Year :-D

Someone from a very distant side of my family (i.e never met or heard of each other) got in touch with me as they'd like me to photograph there wedding due to recommendations.
I came up with what I thought a brilliant prices package for them - which they refused as the cost is to high, what do you think?

  • Morning til Evening (no time limit)
  • All Final Images on Copyright and Watermark free DVD
  • Black and White copy of each picture
  • Photo Book
  • Online Gallery with Family and Friends Access
  • Wall Canvas 12" x 10"
  • Portrait Shoots of Family and Friends in front of a White Screen
  • Photo Prints 5 = 10” x 7” and 1 = 12” x 10”


Let alone they live 90 miles away!

All for £800($1300 if you're on the other side of the pond lol), unless I'm mistaken then surely that's a price that's hard to refuse?

I did a bit of research and couldn't find anything that matched this for the price, I'd be close to making no profit at all if I went any lower :confused:

Jay



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Jan 03, 2013 05:34 |  #2

$1300 is a steal if you're a fabulous wedding photographer; $1300 is way way overpriced if you're just a dude with a camera and not that much experience. I have no idea where you are in the continuum between these possibilities.

It is possible they contacted you mainly because they thought your prices would be very low due to the relationship, tenuous as it may be.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookiejay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 67
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Nottingham, UK
     
Jan 03, 2013 05:51 |  #3

I'm not going to say I'm anywhere near being a pro wedding photographer, but so far from the weddings I have done I've had nothing but compliments and tears of joy with people coming back to me and saying they've recommended me to others (which is where I get most of my business).

She wanted me to quote her without all the bells and whistles, purely photos on a DVD, but with the travel etc I just don't think it'd be worth it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SOK
Goldmember
Avatar
1,592 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
     
Jan 03, 2013 05:58 |  #4

cookiejay wrote in post #15438353 (external link)
surely that's a price that's hard to refuse

If your quote is beyond their budget, then it's easy to refuse.

Only negotiate down on price if you can negotiate down on deliverables (ie half-day instead of full day).

If it's your best and final offer and she thinks it's too high, walk away.


Steve
SOK Images - Wedding and Event Photography Gold Coast (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christopher ­ Steven ­ b
Goldmember
Avatar
3,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
     
Jan 03, 2013 06:23 |  #5

If you're far from professional it seems odd to be charging much of anything in my opinion.



christopher steven b. - Ottawa Wedding Photographer

www.christopherstevenb​.com (external link)| Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fernando
Goldmember
Avatar
1,628 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
     
Jan 03, 2013 06:36 |  #6

I think you dodged a bullet. Family can often have the highest expectations while also wanting the steepest "family discounts". You might post a link to your portfolio so we can get a feel for the quality.

Assuming even passable quality I would tell them that the extras were things you were throwing in and the price isn't that flexible.

Were you going to be invited to the wedding if you weren't shooting? If not it lets you know how much of a discount to even consider.


Fuji convert - Ping me if you have any Fuji gear or legacy glass you're moving.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookiejay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 67
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Nottingham, UK
     
Jan 03, 2013 06:42 |  #7

My last customer was recommended from someone for my 'professional' work, doesn't mean I class myself as a professional.

I look at some of the pictures on this website, including yours Christopher and think the work is amazing. But as I work full time and see photography more of a hobby that helps pay the bills, I'll never want to carry the title as a professional regardless of how many courses I take or events I photograph, not even in 30+ years unless I decide to change careers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookiejay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
120 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 67
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Nottingham, UK
     
Jan 03, 2013 06:44 |  #8

Fernando wrote in post #15438439 (external link)
Were you going to be invited to the wedding if you weren't shooting? If not it lets you know how much of a discount to even consider.

I like this point :) and the answer is no, I wouldn't have been invited




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glumpy
Senior Member
388 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 03, 2013 07:00 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Seems to me this is no different to any other enquiry and quotation.
They enquired, you quoted, they rejected, end of story.
The fact they are family is irrelevant if you have never even heard of each other and for mine has no bearing on the issue at all.

as an aside, I find some of your inclusions quite strange.
Why would you offer a B/W copy of each picture?
When I shoot B/w I set them up as a B/w Pic and use the elements and features of the pic to give it value as a b/w. To me just making everything b/w is just doing it for the sake of it and nothing more.

Also a 12x10 Canvas wall print??
That's like a postage stamp on a wall . To me that would be more like an album size and not even big enough for a double page spread.
If you are going to do canvas ( and how many decors does that fit in with these days?) I'd do one you can at least see from the other side of the room.

I have also never heard of family and friends shots in front of a white screen. I understand but even so it still sounds bit odd me and may well be the clients may percieve it's bit of a firing squad line up.

Perhaps this sort of thing is standard in the UK but is sure sounds unusual to me.

I'm wondering if it also fails to have any percieved value to the clients? You said you came up with what YOU thought was a great deal but pretty obviously THEY didn't!
With my wedding coverages I ask a LOT of questions as to what the couple want and add in from a basic coverage. It doesn't matter a hoot what I think is a great deal, if they don't then no gig for me.

Perhaps it's time to take a look at what your clients want in a coverage and if they see any value in a set of B/W pics or being photographed with all the family ( how long does that take out of their reception?) of if they even like canvas prints.

They may rush the idea of a metal or even a decent size standard print but if they are like me, a canvas would be a " OMG, WTF is that left over from the '80's  ???"
Or was it '70's?
Or '60's??

:D


From RDKirk: First, let me check the forum heading...yes, it does say "Business of Photography" and not "Hobby of Photography." Okay. So we're talking about making money, not about hobbies. By "business" I am presuming activities that pay expenses and produce a profit over the long term.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jan 03, 2013 09:11 |  #10

cookiejay wrote in post #15438449 (external link)
My last customer was recommended from someone for my 'professional' work, doesn't mean I class myself as a professional.


When I went pro many years ago, it was because photography was a hobby I loved and all my friends told me how great I was and how beautiful my work was. I was the best photographer any of them knew.

Problem was, I sucked balls and didn't know it. I'm in the process of updating my portfolio right now, and I went back through my portfolio back then. Not a single usable image.

But in the mind of all my friends and family, I was a spectacular photographer with very professional results.

In the grand scheme of photography, my work blew donkeys.

I'm not saying you are good or bad. I haven't looked at it. But just because one person thinks your work is 'professional' quality doesn't mean it is.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CraigPatterson
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Colorado
     
Jan 03, 2013 09:15 |  #11

Thomas Campbell wrote in post #15438843 (external link)
But just because one person thinks your work is 'professional' quality doesn't mean it is.

I agree with everything you've psoted on this subject, but I think you've just proven the opposite of what you intended. The fact that your early work didn't live up to your current standards is meaningless. Enough people thought it was of high enough quality that you were actually able to become a professional because of it. Ergo, your work *was* professional quality, even if you no longer like your old stuff.


I have a ton of gear, but my gear is just a hammer.
www.craigpatterson.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jan 03, 2013 09:19 |  #12

CraigPatterson wrote in post #15438866 (external link)
I agree with everything you've psoted on this subject, but I think you've just proven the opposite of what you intended. The fact that your early work didn't live up to your current standards is meaningless. Enough people thought it was of high enough quality that you were actually able to become a professional because of it. Ergo, your work *was* professional quality, even if you no longer like your old stuff.

Nope, nope.

My work sucked. And I went professional and was super broke for a couple years. Couldn't pay my bills and had to hustle card games and work at coffee shops to make ends meet. I lived on the food that Starbucks threw out at the end of the night for a while [not digging it out of the trash.]

I was just another wannabe photographer.

I made it because I busted my ass and improved. My work was not anywhere near professional quality. But it became professional quality over time.


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jan 03, 2013 10:10 |  #13

My immediate family (brother/sister) would get me for free. Any one else normal rates.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 03, 2013 10:55 |  #14

cookiejay wrote in post #15438453 (external link)
I like this point :) and the answer is no, I wouldn't have been invited

Full price then. They're relatives, but they aren't family.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
Jan 03, 2013 16:50 |  #15

cookiejay wrote in post #15438353 (external link)
Hi All and a Happy New Year :-D

Someone from a very distant side of my family (i.e never met or heard of each other) got in touch with me as they'd like me to photograph there wedding due to recommendations.
I came up with what I thought a brilliant prices package for them - which they refused as the cost is to high, what do you think?

  • Morning til Evening (no time limit)
  • All Final Images on Copyright and Watermark free DVD
  • Black and White copy of each picture
  • Photo Book
  • Online Gallery with Family and Friends Access
  • Wall Canvas 12" x 10"
  • Portrait Shoots of Family and Friends in front of a White Screen
  • Photo Prints 5 = 10” x 7” and 1 = 12” x 10”

Let alone they live 90 miles away!

All for £800($1300 if you're on the other side of the pond lol), unless I'm mistaken then surely that's a price that's hard to refuse?

I did a bit of research and couldn't find anything that matched this for the price, I'd be close to making no profit at all if I went any lower :confused:

Jay

I think that Glumpy has mades some good points.

A typical shoot and burn wedding (disc of images - minimal processing) in my experience comes it at around £500 - £550 in the UK. Some are more, some less but that's a good average.

Therefore do I put £250 - £300 value on your extras - honestly no.

If they want cheaper I'd offer a disc of images covering :

  • Pre-ceremony at venue,
  • brides arrival,
  • ceremony,
  • formals,
  • bride/groom portraits,
  • reception to cutting of the cake
£500

That should get you all done within 4-5 hours.

If they want evening reception to 1st dance I'd add on an extra £100.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,884 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Family Wedding Rates?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1322 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.