Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment People 
Thread started 04 Jan 2013 (Friday) 06:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Random woman in the park

 
carrottspc
Member
Avatar
148 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Nashville
     
Jan 04, 2013 06:15 |  #1

IMAGE: http://www.scottcarrphoto.com/img/s2/v58/p426916503-5.jpg

| Nikon D7100, D7000 | Olympus E-M5 | Olympus E-PM1 | Samsung NX2000 | Canon D10 |
http://www.scottcarrph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Ispriluc
Member
200 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Romania
     
Jan 04, 2013 09:02 |  #2

Exif says 140 mm, what was the lens? I like this photo.


600d + 50mm 1.8 II, Sigma 18-250/ Nissin Di600/ G1X/ Ixus 220/ Raynox 150

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patspicasa
Senior Member
449 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Jan 04, 2013 09:11 as a reply to  @ Ispriluc's post |  #3

Sensational work - well done


No signature

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carrottspc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
148 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Nashville
     
Jan 04, 2013 14:26 |  #4

Ispriluc wrote in post #15443088 (external link)
Exif says 140 mm, what was the lens? I like this photo.

I believe at the time, I was using a 70-200mm L series f4 non IS Canon lens.


| Nikon D7100, D7000 | Olympus E-M5 | Olympus E-PM1 | Samsung NX2000 | Canon D10 |
http://www.scottcarrph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,740 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 9914
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Jan 04, 2013 14:53 as a reply to  @ carrottspc's post |  #5

I wonder what she would think if she ran across this picture. Realizing that someone had taken her picture without her knowledge and posted it on the internet.

I know it might make me feel a little weird.

And please understand, I'm not trying to call any wrong here.....it's just one of those odd ball thoughts that pop in.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leeport
Senior Member
Avatar
817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
     
Jan 04, 2013 15:17 |  #6

a little voyeuristic..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mikelangelo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,262 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2005
Location: West Chicago, United States
     
Jan 04, 2013 15:19 |  #7

technically, it's a fine photo. clean, sharp, well exposed. But... what's the point? What's the story? If it's a test image, that's cool.

I don't mind the concept of a voyeuristic photo... but there's not story/concept in it. (imo)


--
Photoblog (external link)
7d::17-50 f/2.8::100 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ku8843
Member
95 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jan 04, 2013 15:28 |  #8

Yeah, I don't understand the point here. Is this to show that you can now achieve shallow depth of field and you are proud of that?


5D III | 70D | 15-30 2.8 VC | 24-70 2.8 VC | 70-200mm 2.8 IS II | Σ 35mm 1.4 | 85mm 1.8 | 100mm 2.8 IS | 1.4x Extender II | 2x Extender III | Kenko Extension Tubes | 580EXII | YN565 | Einstein640 (x3)
http://www.scottpeters​onphoto.com (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/ScottPetersonPhoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jacobwilson99
Member
59 posts
Joined Dec 2012
     
Jan 04, 2013 17:41 |  #9

Ditto the above two posts.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisvanbeekum
Senior Member
495 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jan 04, 2013 20:41 |  #10

i dont see anything special about this. sorry, its a lady reading, from a bad angle. no reason to even take this. not to mention creepy


5D MK II- 7D - /50 1.4 - 85 1.8 - 24 105 f4L "I WANT A 35L"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ispriluc
Member
200 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Romania
     
Jan 05, 2013 00:54 |  #11

saea501 wrote in post #15444688 (external link)
I wonder what she would think if she ran across this picture. Realizing that someone had taken her picture without her knowledge and posted it on the internet.

Probably the same as the people posted in urban candids, street photo etc.


600d + 50mm 1.8 II, Sigma 18-250/ Nissin Di600/ G1X/ Ixus 220/ Raynox 150

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Six6Sicks
Senior Member
Avatar
471 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Apr 2012
Location: IL
     
Jan 05, 2013 01:00 |  #12

Next series to follow: "Random fuzz on the carpet"


Gear: Yes.
Insert stupid photography quote here to make me more of a photographer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
22,301 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1628
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 05, 2013 01:06 |  #13

saea501 wrote in post #15444688 (external link)
I wonder what she would think if she ran across this picture. Realizing that someone had taken her picture without her knowledge and posted it on the internet...

Especially since she appears to be nude, except for sunglasses, earrings and necklace.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carrottspc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
148 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Nashville
     
Jan 05, 2013 05:54 as a reply to  @ rrblint's post |  #14

Thank you all for the critiques on this. I was just essentially doing street photography. I've read some good insight on this and will be a bit more selective on what is both shot and posted.


| Nikon D7100, D7000 | Olympus E-M5 | Olympus E-PM1 | Samsung NX2000 | Canon D10 |
http://www.scottcarrph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AAphotog
Senior Member
828 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jan 09, 2013 18:11 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

patspicasa wrote in post #15443132 (external link)
Sensational work - well done

seriously?


5d3, 50mm 1.4, 70-200mm F4 L, 17-40mm F4 L
But hey, they say it's not the gear right:rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,811 views & 0 likes for this thread
Random woman in the park
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Sourav111
894 guests, 335 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.