Up until this morning, I had my sites set on a used 70-200. This morning I learned that the 135 2.0 L existed and the reviews were excellent. People were saying it was better than the 70-200, etc.
I want to see what input you may have on this. I mainly shoot outdoor portraits. On paper, the 135 definitely looks better, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is. What are y'alls thoughts on this?