Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 07 Jan 2013 (Monday) 21:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What's better works for backup HDD or CF/SD cards

 
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jan 09, 2013 11:36 |  #31

I wonder if you could burn a DVD with the JPEGs from each wedding and mail them to your mother's more frequently. Your current strategy results in you only having off site backups with the oldest work and losing the newest work is more likely to become an issue, isn't it?


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jan 09, 2013 11:38 |  #32

tkbslc wrote in post #15462800 (external link)
My (poorly executed) plan is to rotate USB hard drives from my office, which is 20 miles from my house and on the 4th floor. What actually happens most of the time is all 3 copies of my photos sit within 2 feet of each other. :oops:

mike_d wrote in post #15462824 (external link)
We all start out with the best of intentions, then the rest of our lives gets in the way of rotating backups. That's why I do an online backup too. It might not be perfect, but it gets done.



Hey, this thread was a good reminder. I rotated my backups last night and have a fresh copy of all my photos and videos at my office! :)


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RTPVid
Goldmember
3,365 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2010
Location: MN
     
Jan 09, 2013 12:09 |  #33

tkbslc wrote in post #15465862 (external link)
after 5-10 years of just sitting, many drives would never start up again. I agree with your logic, but I'd do at worst annual refresh to make sure the drive is still working and data is there. And just to keep the bearings from seizing up.

Good point. HD's are mechanical devices at heart, and mechanical devices have things like bearings and seals that harden, etc, with disuse. I'm not sure what the time-frame should be, but they should be regularly powered up and checked for integrity. The mere act of powering them up and running chkdsk (for example) will tend to "refresh" the bearings and seals.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
3,005 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2011
Location: The Great White North
     
Jan 09, 2013 13:56 |  #34

tkbslc wrote in post #15465862 (external link)
after 5-10 years of just sitting, many drives would never start up again. I agree with your logic, but I'd do at worst annual refresh to make sure the drive is still working and data is there. And just to keep the bearings from seizing up.

RTPVid wrote in post #15466317 (external link)
Good point. HD's are mechanical devices at heart, and mechanical devices have things like bearings and seals that harden, etc, with disuse. I'm not sure what the time-frame should be, but they should be regularly powered up and checked for integrity. The mere act of powering them up and running chkdsk (for example) will tend to "refresh" the bearings and seals.

Agreed, checking your data every 5-10 years is asking for data loss.


Joel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonneymendoza
Goldmember
3,794 posts
Likes: 391
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jan 10, 2013 01:37 |  #35

Good way to backup jpegs is on flickr. its unlimited and can store them privatly as well.


Canon 5dmkIII | Canon 85L 1.2 | Sigma 35mm ART 1.4|Canon 16-35mm L 2.8 |Canon 24-70mm L f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F2.8L MK2 | Canon 430EX MK2 Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedge
Senior Member
417 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jan 10, 2013 12:27 |  #36

SMP_Homer wrote in post #15465978 (external link)
my backup system is leaning more on immediate than long-term backup...
come home from wedding, cards get backed up to laptop... cards set aside and not reused until wedding is delivered... new laptop images get backed-up to RAID box....
so before I start editing, I have 3 copies of the wedding... once wedding is edited and delivered, I'm down to a copy on the RAID box...
Once a year and/or whenever I remember and feel like it, I copy all the current year (or as far back as the last time) on a new drive and get that dropped off at my mom's place, which is pretty far away) so eventually that wedding is now at 2 locations... but that 2nd location doesn't happen sometimes until a year later (or more... I think my last offsite was 14 months ago now)
uploading, and potentially recovering gigs to/from the cloud isn't feasible for me

Depending on your NAS/RAID box, external drive that it rsyncs to. At least its a second copy even if its just on site.


7D - 100-400 L, Sigma 28, Sigma 17-70 2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
npompei
Senior Member
563 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Warrington, PA
     
Jan 10, 2013 12:59 |  #37

joeblack2022 wrote in post #15466841 (external link)
Agreed, checking your data every 5-10 years is asking for data loss.



Correct, just as everyone mentioned, check them yearly. That was my point, sorry if that got lost. I meant to keep the drives for that amount of time, then trash them and move on. Yearly backups are always good!


www.nickpompei.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Canon 5d3-gripped / Canon 5d / Canon EOS M / Phottix Mitros + (3) / Tamron 17-35 (2.8-4.0) / Tamron 28-75 (2.8) / Canon 35L / Canon 50 (1.4) / Sigma 85 (1.4) / Canon 70-200(2.8)IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LincsRP
Senior Member
427 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 40
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Lincolnshire,UK
     
Jan 11, 2013 14:12 as a reply to  @ npompei's post |  #38

A system I use is to use a smaller ex HDD to load daily/weekly and archive each event to DVD/Blueray or whatever then when this drive is full buy one twice the size, load the smaller drive to the newer and load up to the newer drive until full, then buy another twice the size etc.

The old drives are stored away having loaded all events to DVD/Blueray and to the newer drives so there's multiple copies should any one not start again or become corrupted.

The DVD's are stored at our own business premises and HDDs at home. Each HDD is marked with the year the contents were shot.

At the moment I have nine ex HDD drives totalling about 7TB sitting on the bench each taking different events as they are shot. I have a paper log on the side detailing to which drive an event goes to and occasionally I scan the log and load to the biggest and latest drive so I can access it easily to see where an event might be.

With the occasional weddings I do I simply keep all files on backup cards until backed to 3 ex HDDs, archived on DVD then I format them.

As I shoot jpegs I really don't fill the drives up as quickly as you raw shooters do even tho I shoot about 70,000 images a year. My oldest ex HDD is now about 9yrs old and it fired up perfectly just before Christmas when I tested several (well two to be exact).


Steve
www.lincsracephotos.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,268 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
What's better works for backup HDD or CF/SD cards
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1232 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.