Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 03 Jan 2013 (Thursday) 15:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Replacing kit lens with these.....

 
Ronnie ­ H
Goldmember
1,793 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Twining, Michigan USA
     
Jan 04, 2013 06:02 |  #16

Sigma 17-70 2.8-4 OS HSM At $299 at B&H,,thats the one i just got,,and like it so far,,,i think its will be a great walk around lens??useing on a Canon T3i,but its alittle bigger and alot heavier,,but much better build...haven,t had it long enough to Jude IQ
----------
Ron




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
taylorman00
Member
175 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 05, 2013 20:02 |  #17

I'm also looking at replacing my kit lens, and all of the feedback I've received has pointed me towards the Tamron 17-50 over the Sigma. You might consider the Sigma 17-50 too or the Canon 15-85.


Gripped Canon 5D | 24-105 f/4L
Some Pictures (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orionz06
Member
Avatar
231 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Pittsbugh, PA
     
Jan 06, 2013 00:50 |  #18

I just got hands on my 17-55 Canon. Great lens, better in many respects than the Tamron non-VC for sure but I do not, for one minute, feel that I was held back by the Tamron. My 17-50 is a hell of a lens and I am debating on actually keeping it after some quick comparison shots, mainly random charts and text to see sharpness.


5D Mark IV~7D+BG-E7/400D~Canon 50mm f/1.8 II~EF 100mm f/2.8 L IS Macro~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II~EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II~EF 50mm f/1.4 USM~Yongnuo YN-565EX ETTL~Yongnuo YN-E3-RT~Canon 600EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ925
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jan 06, 2013 08:04 |  #19

orionz06 wrote in post #15450618 (external link)
I just got hands on my 17-55 Canon. Great lens, better in many respects than the Tamron non-VC for sure but I do not, for one minute, feel that I was held back by the Tamron. My 17-50 is a hell of a lens and I am debating on actually keeping it after some quick comparison shots, mainly random charts and text to see sharpness.

I would love the canon 17-55 but jut a little out of my budget. I've never used the Sigma but thought it would worth looking at it through B&H at the sale price

I've rented the tamron and loved it


T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
www.flickr.com/photos/​russ925/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orionz06
Member
Avatar
231 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Pittsbugh, PA
     
Jan 06, 2013 12:20 |  #20

Just get the Tamron, you won't be disappointed.


5D Mark IV~7D+BG-E7/400D~Canon 50mm f/1.8 II~EF 100mm f/2.8 L IS Macro~EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II~EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II~EF 50mm f/1.4 USM~Yongnuo YN-565EX ETTL~Yongnuo YN-E3-RT~Canon 600EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ925
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jan 10, 2013 07:42 |  #21

Thanks for all the input - I picked up the Tamron 17-50 yesterday.

The sales rep highly recommended it (he used to work for Sigma for what its worth)


T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
www.flickr.com/photos/​russ925/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 33
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jan 10, 2013 07:53 |  #22

russ925 wrote in post #15469914 (external link)
The sales rep highly recommended it (he used to work for Sigma for what its worth)

One important thing to point out:
don't listen to sales reps. I'm sure he would also have highly recommended the canon 75-300 if you'd asked about it and shown an interest in buying it.

That said, you will be happy with the lens.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,348 views & 0 likes for this thread
Replacing kit lens with these.....
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is David_G
899 guests, 399 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.