You don't need to expose correctly with the D600 anymore! underexposing is the new thing
http://www.flickr.com …s/scottbasile/8050981955/
punkerz123 Senior Member  328 posts Joined Jun 2009 More info | Jan 11, 2013 21:06 | #46 You don't need to expose correctly with the D600 anymore! underexposing is the new thing Olympus OM-D E-M5 | 25mm f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
manjazz123 Hatchling 1 post Joined Jan 2013 More info | Jan 11, 2013 21:11 | #47 punkerz123 wrote in post #15477184 You don't need to expose correctly with the D600 anymore! underexposing is the new thing http://www.flickr.com …s/scottbasile/8050981955/ No doubt, the shadow recovery on the d600 is fantastic.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bakewell Goldmember 1,385 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Irvine, CA More info | Jan 11, 2013 21:24 | #48  Permanent bandelhi wrote in post #15477138 ^ I love this guy! He is so funny!!! Let me guess...a frustrated 5DmkIII owner? Hmmm. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jorkata Member 213 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Jan 11, 2013 22:27 | #49 Bakewell wrote in post #15473406 It seems a lot of Canon 5DMKIII owners are very upset about the 6D. Don't know how you arrived at this conclusion.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xinvisionx Goldmember  More info | Jan 11, 2013 22:31 | #50 jorkata wrote in post #15477475 Don't know how you arrived at this conclusion. What I'm seeing is people trading up from the 6D to the 5DIII - if not going straight to the 5DIII, that is. The biggest issue with the 6D is not the deficient specs or the primitive AF system but the consumer ergonomics. It's a killer for pros but also for enthusiasts. Not sure what Canon was thinking. Consumer are not spending $2K for a camera, so why the consumer ergonomics  .Overall, the 6D seems to exist only to upsell people to the 5DIII and to stop people from switching to Nikon. The 6D sensor is super good, though. No argument about that. I upgraded from the 60D to the 6D. Done and done. Love it! My name is James ~ Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bakewell Goldmember 1,385 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Irvine, CA More info | Jan 11, 2013 22:56 | #51 Permanent banjorkata wrote in post #15477475 Consumer are not spending $2K for a camera, so why the consumer ergonomics .Really? Consumer ergonomics? Nonsense! I bought this camera and from what I can tell from perusing numerous forums I'm far from the only one. This camera takes fantastic unequaled pictures for 2K. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember  4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Jan 11, 2013 23:26 | #52 Loving the images but miss the joystick. As an ex-5D2 owner, it's every bit as well built as the 5D2 was. Sure, it has a polycarbonate top, but it has to for the wifi and gps. All this talk about consumer ergonomics is silly. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RobDickinson Goldmember More info | Jan 11, 2013 23:36 | #53 jorkata wrote in post #15477475 Don't know how you arrived at this conclusion. What I'm seeing is people trading up from the 6D to the 5DIII - if not going straight to the 5DIII, that is. The biggest issue with the 6D is not the deficient specs or the primitive AF system but the consumer ergonomics. It's a killer for pros but also for enthusiasts. Not sure what Canon was thinking. Consumer are not spending $2K for a camera, so why the consumer ergonomics .Overall, the 6D seems to exist only to upsell people to the 5DIII and to stop people from switching to Nikon. The 6D sensor is super good, though. No argument about that.
 An awful waste of space by robjdickinson, on Flickr Just another.... by robjdickinson, on Flickr What goes around... by robjdickinson, on Flickr A storm builds by robjdickinson, on Flickr Scarborough Seascape by robjdickinson, on Flickrwww.HeroWorkshops.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember 4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Jan 12, 2013 00:10 | #54 Jeez, Rob, my 6D isn't nearly as good as yours! 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RobDickinson Goldmember More info | Jan 12, 2013 00:44 | #55 Hehe I guess there all as good as each other, unless canon sent me one of the good ones? www.HeroWorkshops.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ERJL Senior Member  384 posts Joined Dec 2012 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Jan 12, 2013 13:27 | #56 Permanent banRobDickinson wrote in post #15477833 Hehe I guess there all as good as each other, unless canon sent me one of the good ones? Anyhow it'll have to go back in the next week or two  Am curious as to why? -ERJL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RobDickinson Goldmember More info | Jan 12, 2013 14:02 | #57 ERJL wrote in post #15479389 Am curious as to why? Its been loaned to me by canon for review... www.HeroWorkshops.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2013 15:25 | #58 jorkata wrote in post #15477475 Don't know how you arrived at this conclusion. What I'm seeing is people trading up from the 6D to the 5DIII - if not going straight to the 5DIII, that is. The biggest issue with the 6D is not the deficient specs or the primitive AF system but the consumer ergonomics. It's a killer for pros but also for enthusiasts. Not sure what Canon was thinking. Consumer are not spending $2K for a camera, so why the consumer ergonomics .Overall, the 6D seems to exist only to upsell people to the 5DIII and to stop people from switching to Nikon. The 6D sensor is super good, though. No argument about that. I'm a consumer. I spent $2000 on this camera. I came from 60D so the size is perfect, I like how you've been sold on the bigger is better, it's not.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RobDickinson Goldmember More info | Jan 12, 2013 15:32 | #59 Jorkata afik hasnt posted a single photo to this board as far as I can see. www.HeroWorkshops.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 12, 2013 15:50 | #60 M_Six wrote in post #15463635 The built-in AF beam is fine until you try to grab a shot of wildlife in low light and they spook when the beam fires up. ... Or your subject is just too far away for an assist beam to work. Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is rickldewitt 1096 guests, 151 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
