Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 11 Jan 2013 (Friday) 17:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Is the tamron 17-50 2.8 worth the up grade from the 18-55 kit.

 
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jan 12, 2013 07:52 |  #16

Ishoot4fun wrote in post #15476564 (external link)
Looking at possiably buying a used tamron 17-50 2.8 lens to replace the canon 18-55 kit; Would this be worth getting as an upgrade to my current 18-55 canon kit lens.

I figured i would gain on the wide end, max aperture of 2.8 through out the zoom range and it includes a lens hood.
they are asking 230.00 canadian, thinking i could get it cheaper.

worth spending the money on.
I think the 2.8 would be nice..
what you think?

definitely worth it, sharper than the kit lens if you don't need IS

XSi (450D)
Tamron 17-50 2.8

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8183/8106252106_ae3f716a94_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
jamganz
Goldmember
3,244 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1163
Joined Jun 2011
Location: New York
     
Jan 12, 2013 08:04 |  #17

watt100 wrote in post #15478390 (external link)
definitely worth it, sharper than the kit lens if you don't need IS

+1 ...with this range, you don't even need the IS. I had concern that I might miss the IS when I made the switch from the kit lens to the Tammy 17-50 non vc. Haven't had any situations where i've missed it. Better color and contrast than kit lens too. At that price, I'd jump on it, provided it';s in good condition.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
russ925
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jan 12, 2013 08:22 |  #18

Buy it - you will not be sorry. I replaced my kit lens with the Tamron and its on my camera most of the time.


T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
www.flickr.com/photos/​russ925/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brianeb
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Brisbane
     
Jan 13, 2013 02:00 |  #19

I have that lens on a 50D and have been reasonably happy, (definitely a marked improvement over the kit lens) until the other day, the zoom and focus rings are stuck.(wasn't dropped but I was using in sub zero C temperatures) I have had two Tamrons (70-200) and both have caused problems, so I am thinking that the 17-50 wont be worth repairing with new ones under 300A$. I am looking at the Canon 17-55 f2.8 or the 15-85. I think i will give Tamron a miss for a while.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ajaxthe2nd
Member
Avatar
184 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington Twp, MI
     
Jan 13, 2013 02:12 |  #20

It is a great lens for the money, period!


matthewharperphotograp​hy.com (external link)
facebook.com/matthewha​rperphotography (external link)
www.instagram.com/matt​hewharperphoto

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AmosTFairchild
Member
Avatar
63 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jan 13, 2013 03:21 |  #21

Buy it. I think I paid about $300 for mine. Use it most of the time now.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimmyt
Senior Member
706 posts
Likes: 41
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 13, 2013 12:33 |  #22

If you have $700 which lens are you going to upgrade for your kit len?
Compair between Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 and Sigma 17-50mm 2.8.
Which one is better?
I am thingking about to upgrade my kit len too, im my mind I have sigma 17-50mm, just waiting for good deal.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RogerC11
Senior Member
467 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jan 13, 2013 12:53 |  #23

jimmyt wrote in post #15482853 (external link)
If you have $700 which lens are you going to upgrade for your kit len?
Compair between Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 and Sigma 17-50mm 2.8.
Which one is better?
I am thingking about to upgrade my kit len too, im my mind I have sigma 17-50mm, just waiting for good deal.

I'd wait til the reviews on the newly announced sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS macro come out. It is part of Sigma's new line of lenses and if it's any bit as good as their new 35mm 1.4, it will be a homerun for sigma. It's already available for preorder at bhphoto for $499.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mnphotos
Senior Member
Avatar
750 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Minnesota
     
Jan 13, 2013 13:01 |  #24

RogerC11 wrote in post #15482915 (external link)
I'd wait til the reviews on the newly announced sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS macro come out. It is part of Sigma's new line of lenses and if it's any bit as good as their new 35mm 1.4, it will be a homerun for sigma. It's already available for preorder at bhphoto for $499.

+1

I'm going to do just that also.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amamba
Goldmember
Avatar
3,675 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Nov 2007
Location: SE MI
     
Jan 13, 2013 13:06 |  #25

RogerC11 wrote in post #15482915 (external link)
I'd wait til the reviews on the newly announced sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS macro come out. It is part of Sigma's new line of lenses and if it's any bit as good as their new 35mm 1.4, it will be a homerun for sigma. It's already available for preorder at bhphoto for $499.

It really depends - is 50 to 70mm range and macro worth giving up constant 2.8 ? Not for me. But that's really for OP to decide.

I went from Tamron 17-50/2.8 non-VC to Sigma 17-50/2.8 OS and it was an improvement in AF speed vs same IQ. Both are great.


Ex-Canon shooter. Now Sony Nex.
Life Lessons: KISS. RTFM. Don't sweat the small stuff.
My Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimmyt
Senior Member
706 posts
Likes: 41
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 13, 2013 13:16 |  #26

RogerC11 wrote in post #15482915 (external link)
I'd wait til the reviews on the newly announced sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.0 OS macro come out. It is part of Sigma's new line of lenses and if it's any bit as good as their new 35mm 1.4, it will be a homerun for sigma. It's already available for preorder at bhphoto for $499.

Good to know
Amazon $389
http://www.amazon.com …non-Digital/dp/B002ZNJB32 (external link)

BH $399
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …70mm_F2_8_4_DC_​Macro.html (external link)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,095 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 333
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jan 13, 2013 20:19 |  #27

Amamba wrote in post #15482955 (external link)
It really depends - is 50 to 70mm range and macro worth giving up constant 2.8 ? Not for me. But that's really for OP to decide.

I went from Tamron 17-50/2.8 non-VC to Sigma 17-50/2.8 OS and it was an improvement in AF speed vs same IQ. Both are great.

Same here - I upgraded from kit to Tamron 17-50 non-VC to Sigma 17-50 OS and saw a significant improvement after every upgrade.


6D, Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, Laowa 15mm 1:1 macro, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RogerC11
Senior Member
467 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jan 13, 2013 20:29 |  #28

You linked the old lens from 2010. This is the new one from their new line of lenses with the improved build quality, aesthetics, and if the 35mm is any indication, highly improved optics as well.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …0mm_f_2_8_4_DC_​Macro.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,309 views & 0 likes for this thread
Is the tamron 17-50 2.8 worth the up grade from the 18-55 kit.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is TechOne
806 guests, 383 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.