I'm sure you understand the principle of diminishing returns, right?
Because of the diminishing returns, each photographer gets to decide for himself at which point on that scale he will make a purchase.
Surely you don't think that the Zeiss should be 5 times better if it costs 5 times as much?
Consider major league baseball players. There are a bunch of scrubs on the waiver wire that will bat .240 Teams could sign any of them for around $300,000 per season. Does that mean that if they pay a player $600,000 they should realistically expect him to bat .480? Surely not. If there was a player that batted .480, he would command in excess of 30 or 40 million dollars a year!
These same principles apply to not only camera gear, but to just about everything in life.
"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".