
Headsick - wonderful details on the eagle⦠which lens, how far away were you?
Thanks. This was taken with the 100-400L. Focal length was 200mm, and according to the exif, the eagle was about 44 meters away, which sounds about right.
Jan 08, 2013 08:51 | #10591 ShadowCaver wrote in post #15458667 ![]() Headsick - wonderful details on the eagle⦠which lens, how far away were you? Thanks. This was taken with the 100-400L. Focal length was 200mm, and according to the exif, the eagle was about 44 meters away, which sounds about right. Head Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2013 21:44 | #10592 The rest can be seen here: http://www.flickr.com …y/sets/72157632455905251/ ![]() Eagle 44 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …adphotography/8362558627/ ![]() Eagle 27 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …adphotography/8363625976/ ![]() Eagle 7 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …adphotography/8362560351/ ![]() Eagle 6 ![]() ![]() Head Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info | ^^^very nice!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pope953 Member ![]() 158 posts Joined May 2011 Location: Western NC More info | Jan 13, 2013 22:41 | #10596 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/64910400@N06/8378054339/ ![]() IMG_0408.jpg ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/64910400@N06/8379197796/ ![]() IMG_0339.jpg ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/64910400@N06/8378052599/ ![]() IMG_0370.jpg ![]() ![]() My Gear: 7D, Sigma 100-300 HSM f/4, Sigma 70-200 HSM f/2.8, Sigma 30mm HSM f/1.4, Canon 50mm II f/1.8, Canon 17-40L f/4, Rokinon 8mm f/3.5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bobster Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jan 16, 2013 12:27 | #10598 shouldn't worry about high ISO capabilities of this body - 3200-12800 if you have to use it to get the shot. use it Robert Whetton
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ONE30 I don't have a point!!! ![]() 4,281 posts Likes: 1541 Joined Mar 2011 Location: newYORK More info | ...i'll try to continue spamming to keep this thread going!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 28, 2013 00:00 | #10602 50D + 100-400L ![]() Eagle47 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …adphotography/8421955077/ ![]() Eagle 12 ![]() ![]() More can be seen here: http://www.flickr.com …30871310/with/8423049428/ ![]() Head Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ekinnyc Senior Member ![]() 784 posts Likes: 14 Joined Mar 2011 Location: New York, NY More info | Jan 28, 2013 16:11 | #10603 how are you guys getting such clean shots? i just took my 50D+24-70 to LA, and all shots have alot of noise (at least when i zoom 1:1). ill post up example tonight when i get home. am i just overthinking it? 6D| 35mm f/2 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 28, 2013 16:19 | #10604 ekinnyc wrote in post #15544729 ![]() how are you guys getting such clean shots? i just took my 50D+24-70 to LA, and all shots are noisy (at least when i zoom 1:1). am i just overthinking it? It all depends on the settings the camera is using, and the exposure. For example, the 50D tends to produce cleaner images at normal full stop ISO's (100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200), and especially at the lower end of that. Also, if you expose to the right (aka ETTR), which is to over-expose the image, just a bit, you tend to get a better balanced, and cleaner image, especially when the exposure is brought back down in post. Along with that, the 50D really prefers high quality glass, but there's plenty of examples in this thread using lower end glass that are still fantastic. My recommendation is to shoot, a lot, and try different settings. Stay away from full auto, especially on the ISO. You may also want to consider turning off in-camera noise reduction and the auto lighting optimizer (ALO). Head Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ekinnyc Senior Member ![]() 784 posts Likes: 14 Joined Mar 2011 Location: New York, NY More info | Jan 28, 2013 16:34 | #10605 Headsick wrote in post #15544769 ![]() It all depends on the settings the camera is using, and the exposure. For example, the 50D tends to produce cleaner images at normal full stop ISO's (100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200), and especially at the lower end of that. Also, if you expose to the right (aka ETTR), which is to over-expose the image, just a bit, you tend to get a better balanced, and cleaner image, especially when the exposure is brought back down in post. Along with that, the 50D really prefers high quality glass, but there's plenty of examples in this thread using lower end glass that are still fantastic. My recommendation is to shoot, a lot, and try different settings. Stay away from full auto, especially on the ISO. You may also want to consider turning off in-camera noise reduction and the auto lighting optimizer (ALO). thanks. i was trying to stick to ISO200 for the most part. it was pretty sunny, so no issues there. got the good glass, just need the skill 6D| 35mm f/2 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is suiyuan 656 guests, 259 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |