Went a bit dark on this one.
GOA510 Senior Member 345 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Tracy, CA More info | Jan 31, 2013 20:51 | #1111 Went a bit dark on this one. [1D Mark III][5D Mark II][15 2.8 Fisheye][17-40 F4L][24-70L][85 1.2L][70-200 F2.8L IS][300 F2.8L]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2013 10:02 | #1112 |
torks Hatchling 4 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Hi everybody,   The Takoyaki Brothers by LP Labranche, on Flickr Into the Vortex by LP Labranche, on FlickrI hope you enjoy ------------ My Flickr : http://www.flickr.com/photos/labranche/ My 500px : http://500px.com/labranche ------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 01, 2013 17:51 | #1114 |
triton3k Goldmember  3,358 posts Likes: 283 Joined Aug 2011 Location: The Bronx, NYC More info | Feb 02, 2013 19:37 | #1115 GoA510 really digging that shot.  365 PROJECT DAY 33 by Denn-Ice, on FlickrDenn_Ice
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 03, 2013 11:34 | #1116 I've been experimenting with this style as well and love the look. I'm curious if there are any aperture users out there? I did these shots all with Curves, the split toning wheels and vignette and contrast/saturation. Definitely a lot to learn. (The aspect ratios are obviously not right)  Evening Stroll by DavioTheOne, on Flickr Watching the Sunset by DavioTheOne, on FlickrGear: 5D3, 135L, Sigma 35, 50 1.8 STM, 16-35 F/4L IS, 85/1.8, Fujifilm X100T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GOA510 Senior Member 345 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Tracy, CA More info | Feb 03, 2013 11:39 | #1117 N.O.R.E. wrote in post #15559900 ^^ awesome Thank you! Always love your cinematic work, such an inspiration. N.O.R.E. wrote in post #15561766 ^^ love that 2nd one +1 to that. That one is sick! triton3k wrote in post #15565630 GoA510 really digging that shot. Thank you! Really appreciate it!  [1D Mark III][5D Mark II][15 2.8 Fisheye][17-40 F4L][24-70L][85 1.2L][70-200 F2.8L IS][300 F2.8L]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 03, 2013 15:20 | #1118 One more from yesterday.  Vending Machine by DavioTheOne, on FlickrGear: 5D3, 135L, Sigma 35, 50 1.8 STM, 16-35 F/4L IS, 85/1.8, Fujifilm X100T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AAphotog Senior Member 828 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2012 More info | Feb 04, 2013 21:56 | #1119  Permanent ban 5d3, 50mm 1.4, 70-200mm F4 L, 17-40mm F4 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samefly Member  246 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2011 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | I definitely need more practice with this. Any tips? Although this thread is incredible, a lot of the actual tips and how to's get lost. 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 05, 2013 13:14 | #1121 I am not very good at this style...but I think this style REALLY needs the right subject...not just anything works well for this processing style. I think that shows in some of the examples posted that really have that "feel" and seem to work better than others...subject is really key. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2013 16:22 | #1122 TRhoads wrote in post #15575468 I am not very good at this style...but I think this style REALLY needs the right subject...not just anything works well for this processing style. I think that shows in some of the examples posted that really have that "feel" and seem to work better than others...subject is really key. agreed. i think the best ones are the ones that sort of look like this already straight out of the camera FlickR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kiss-o-matic Goldmember  1,738 posts Likes: 8 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Tokyo More info | Feb 05, 2013 19:10 | #1123 courier wrote in post #15553225 These 2. Doesnt get any better. Late reply -- pounded by work . Thanks dude. The black & white rendition of mine smokes all my other photos by a mile in terms of traffic on Flickr. I think someone posted it to a blog or something.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tried my hand at this style. Some of my first attemps with some older pictures.  Photo-0083 by T.W Photography RF, on Flickr Photo-8677 by T.W Photography RF, on FlickrEdit: Are these pics too big for POTN? Im on a different computer with a tiny monitor and its hard to tell.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TRhoads Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 07, 2013 06:37 | #1125 N.O.R.E. wrote in post #15576312 agreed. i think the best ones are the ones that sort of look like this already straight out of the camera agreed, if you have to add a lot of blur in post, it doesn't have the same look as it would if shot with a fast prime. I am going to keep working on it...I don't get out to shoot as much as I would like...but I love a good new challenge. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is yourdesignguys 1267 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
