Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 08 Feb 2013 (Friday) 10:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Declining to shoot male boudoir - legal?

 
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14868
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:11 |  #121

cdifoto wrote in post #15588295 (external link)
And then send them my contact information. I'll shoot anything at least once.

Exactly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:14 |  #122

EastBayGirl wrote in post #15588288 (external link)
This.
The OP wanted a legal question answered that no one seems to have the answer to. Your Dear Blah letter was great.

I don't know if I would specifically call out "Due to anti discrimination law I can't say no" - just say it's something that you don't usually do, and you don't think the quality of work would be up to your usual standards, but if he still wants to hire you then you'll be happy to set up an in-person meeting.

... that still doesn't address the photographer's lack of comfort in doing the shoot - but as businesspeople, sometimes we gotta do things we aren't comfortable doing.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:17 |  #123

nathancarter wrote in post #15588314 (external link)
... that still doesn't address the photographer's lack of comfort in doing the shoot - but as businesspeople, sometimes we gotta do things we aren't comfortable doing.

Indeed. Businesses have no feelings. We have to act like businesses, not people, even though we are the business in most situations.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:22 |  #124

cdifoto wrote in post #15588287 (external link)
Holy crap if tucked tail and ran every time I bumped into something new, I'd never shoot anything. Everyone has to do their first something at some point in time. I had to do my first wedding at some point. I had to do my first Bat Mitzvah at some point. I had to do my first senior portraits at some point. I had to do my first glamour at some point....

I was nervous as hell every damn time, but pushing through rather than running and hiding is what opened new avenues and helped me figure out what I do and do not like/enjoy/suck at. Heck I still get jitters. It's when I don't that I really have to worry.

This whole "comfort zone" thing is more like a rut.

I never said tucking tail and running away, I said if you feel uncomfortable. A responsible photographer will not jump in over there head just because they do not want to turn down a job they feel they are not ready for.

Without risk this world would go back to the stone ages. Every step in technology involves risks.

I had my first wedding, but it was after many portrait sessions and I now felt ready. I was nervous, but not uncomfortable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,365 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1369
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:26 |  #125

charro callado wrote in post #15587755 (external link)
Ironically that sounds more like an indictment of law than of his analogies.

:p

As has been said, "Sometimes the law is an ass" (Charles Dickens), but the question asked was not whether everyone agreed that the law was a fine law, but what it requires (in our inexpert opionions).


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:26 |  #126

gonzogolf wrote in post #15588289 (external link)
And the truth is that if you just decline the work without elaboration, or by giving a plausible simple excuse you can do just that. The case that was bandied about with the commitment ceremony only became an issue because the photographer was dumb enough to make a big point of the discriminating act. He handed the couple a reason and a provocation to move forward with a lawsuit. So just dont be an ass when you turn down work and you wont have any problems.

This reminds me of the movie I watched the other day with Jim Carey. Liar Liar.
If you saw it you know he was a lawyer and you saw the results of having to tell the truth all the time.

I don't like to call it lying, but it's knowing what and how to say things without saying too much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,365 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1369
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:30 |  #127

EastBayGirl wrote in post #15588288 (external link)
This.
The OP wanted a legal question answered that no one seems to have the answer to. Your Dear Blah letter was great.

The OP had already gotten the legal answer from two lawyers, for crying out loud.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EastBayGirl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,829 posts
Gallery: 100 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 3566
Joined Sep 2011
Location: East Bay, CA
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:31 |  #128

nathancarter wrote in post #15588314 (external link)
I don't know if I would specifically call out "Due to anti discrimination law I can't say no" - just say it's something that you don't usually do, and you don't think the quality of work would be up to your usual standards, but if he still wants to hire you then you'll be happy to set up an in-person meeting.

... that still doesn't address the photographer's lack of comfort in doing the shoot - but as businesspeople, sometimes we gotta do things we aren't comfortable doing.

I'm not sure why they would be uncomfortable, maybe their not comfortable looking at a mans body? That doesn't matter if they address it the right way. I would give it a try, but if I was uncomfortable I would just tell them I'm not qualified and leave it at that. They can't sue you for that.


Stina
flickr (external link)
Constructive criticism is always appreciated.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtiss ­ Bryant
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
262 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Feb 08, 2013 16:54 |  #129

RDKirk wrote in post #15588363 (external link)
The OP had already gotten the legal answer from two lawyers, for crying out loud.

But they werent too sure about the answer either. They assumed that since the service was offered to females, that if a male were to ask about the same service, then they would think there would be grounds for a lawsuit if the service was denied on the basis that she doesnt shoot males.

So I figured I would ask the question here :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EastBayGirl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,829 posts
Gallery: 100 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 3566
Joined Sep 2011
Location: East Bay, CA
     
Feb 08, 2013 17:03 |  #130

Curtiss Bryant wrote in post #15588435 (external link)
But they werent too sure about the answer either. They assumed that since the service was offered to females, that if a male were to ask about the same service, then they would think there would be grounds for a lawsuit if the service was denied on the basis that she doesnt shoot males.

So I figured I would ask the question here :)

Looks like it ended up being a pretty hot topic. :D


Stina
flickr (external link)
Constructive criticism is always appreciated.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philwillmedia
Cream of the Crop
5,253 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Nov 2008
Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..."
     
Feb 08, 2013 17:10 |  #131

mguffin wrote in post #15587063 (external link)
...why do women's haircuts cost more than men...?

Hey, that happens in Australia too.
Sorry, off topic I know.

Normal programming can resume.


Regards, Phil
2019 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year - Runner Up
2018 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year
2018 CAMS (now Motorsport Australia) Gold Accredited Photographer
Finallist - 2014 NT Media Awards
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,365 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1369
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Feb 08, 2013 17:11 |  #132

Curtiss Bryant wrote in post #15588435 (external link)
But they werent too sure about the answer either. They assumed that since the service was offered to females, that if a male were to ask about the same service, then they would think there would be grounds for a lawsuit if the service was denied on the basis that she doesnt shoot males.

So I figured I would ask the question here :)

If a lawyer thinks he has grounds for a lawsuit, he can file suit. You got opinions from two lawyers that they think they could file suit.

That's a different answer from "do you think you will win?"


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Channel ­ One
Goldmember
Avatar
1,949 posts
Likes: 203
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Clewiston Florida USA
     
Feb 08, 2013 17:39 |  #133

Curtiss Bryant wrote in post #15586961 (external link)
Ok.. So I have had an interesting conversation with some people in a boudoir facebook group this morning. Someone had mentioned they were approached by a male to do a boudoir shoot of himself and a later session with his girlfriend. The photographer mentioned she wasnt really comfortable and was wondering how to say "no".

My answer quite honestly would be, while their human forms are similar, male boudoir photography requires a skill set and style which in many ways is vastly different then what I have developed to produce female boudoir photography.

That stated, I personally do not feel that I have the skills, nor the needed style to produce a product which would be acceptable to you or a product which you would be willing to pay for.

I apologize for any inconvenience this might cause, but I would rather turn down the job then offer falsehoods about my skills just to book another job, a job that more than likely will result in an unhappy customer, which is something neither of us wants to happen.

Now in my opinion as a photography specialist and lets face it female boudoir photography is a photographic specialty, that is a non-discriminatory answer based upon the skills I either have or do not have.

This would be no different than going to a civil attorney and asking him to handle a criminal matter, whereupon he would refer you to a criminal attorney, yes he is an attorney but his practice and skills are wrapped around civil law, not criminal law.

Wayne


Do what you love and you will love what you do, that applies to both work and life.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Channel ­ One
Goldmember
Avatar
1,949 posts
Likes: 203
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Clewiston Florida USA
     
Feb 08, 2013 17:52 |  #134

cdifoto wrote in post #15587285 (external link)
It was posed as a question. Here's the answer, at least for United Statesburgers:

http://civilrights.fin​dlaw.com …ublic-accommodations.html (external link)

It's worth noting the link you cite mentions prohibitions against discrimination based upon race, color, religion, or national origin, but not sex...

And it refers to public accommodations not a business like photography.

Wayne


Do what you love and you will love what you do, that applies to both work and life.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmcgee131
Member
Avatar
249 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 78
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Indianapolis
     
Feb 08, 2013 18:16 |  #135

Assuming the photog has never performed said services for male clientele,


I am sorry, but I am not qualified to provide these kinds of genre for men at this time. I appreciate your inquiry, but until I get the required training/abilities I am not accepting male boudouir clients.


Feed back #1#2
Learning to read light one click at a time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

23,967 views & 0 likes for this thread, 47 members have posted to it.
Declining to shoot male boudoir - legal?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1987 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.