I think the 70-200 has a minimum fofus of 4 feet and that mayvary somebased on the focal length you've dialed in. Double check that you aren't shooting at MFD.
John from PA Cream of the Crop 10,640 posts Likes: 1270 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Feb 10, 2013 19:30 | #16 I think the 70-200 has a minimum fofus of 4 feet and that mayvary somebased on the focal length you've dialed in. Double check that you aren't shooting at MFD.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2013 22:55 | #17 Here it is. 6D I EF 24-70 F4L I SIGMA 70-200 2.8 OS SPORT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yogi Bear Goldmember 1,492 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2009 Location: League City, TX USA (Houston) More info | Feb 11, 2013 09:41 | #18 Yep. Still back-focused. What was your distance to the subject? Canon EOS 7D | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hdgiles Member 160 posts Likes: 17 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Athens, Georgia More info | Feb 11, 2013 10:11 | #19 I ran your numbers through a DOF calculator and guessed 4 feet distance from the lense to the PC board and it came up with a DOF of 0.03 feet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2013 12:39 | #20 I have used my 50 1.8 @ f/3.2 , 28-135mm @ f/8 , 11, 5.6 at a variety of distances. Does same thing. I purchased a 50d last night, I want to see what how it does. 6D I EF 24-70 F4L I SIGMA 70-200 2.8 OS SPORT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is kirillprokhorov 869 guests, 255 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |