Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Mar 2013 (Saturday) 12:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

canon 180mm L or 100mm L

 
nima12330
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Mar 09, 2013 12:48 |  #1

hello every one
i bought canon 100mm L one year ago and a 180mm L about 2 weeks ago
i compared them and suddenly i see that 100mm L is a little sharper than 180mmL ! is that right ?
I decided to sell 100mm L but now i can't make a decision !!!
my body is canon 60D

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/03/2/LQ_640116.jpg
Image hosted by forum (640116) © nima12330 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/03/2/LQ_640117.jpg
Image hosted by forum (640117) © nima12330 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,310 posts
Likes: 123
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Mar 09, 2013 13:19 |  #2

Stop pixel peeping and just keep the lens that's the most useful to you...

I don't see the advantage of the 100mm, anyway, looking at your sample shots. Both look very sharp.

Or keep both... they serve different purposes.

I have both (along with a couple other macro lenses).

On a crop camera, 180mm is a very long macro lens... more difficult to hold steady, which is just compounded when you need to stop it down more to get any depth of field at all. I mostly use the 180mm on a full frame camera.

The difference in sharpness you think you are seeing might just be camera shake causing slight image softness, more-so with the 180mm since it's so much harder to keep rock steady. Even the slap of the mirror in the camera can cause enough vibration to effect images shot with the 180mm at high magnification.

I use my 100/2.8 USM (not the L, I simply can't justify the extra cost just for IS) on both full frame and crop. It's a lot more handholdable, faster focusing, more "dual purpose".


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Elfstop
Senior Member
Avatar
721 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 09, 2013 13:22 |  #3

bw!

amfoto1 wrote in post #15695446 (external link)
Stop pixel peeping and just keep the lens that's the most useful to you...

I don't see the advantage of the 100mm, anyway, looking at your sample shots. Both look very sharp.

Or keep both... they serve different purposes.

I have both (along with a couple other macro lenses).

On a crop camera, 180mm is a very long macro lens... more difficult to hold steady, which is just compounded when you need to stop it down more to get any depth of field at all. I mostly use the 180mm on a full frame camera.

The difference in sharpness you think you are seeing might just be camera shake causing slight image softness, more-so with the 180mm since it's so much harder to keep rock steady. Even the slap of the mirror in the camera can cause enough vibration to effect images shot with the 180mm at high magnification.

I use my 100/2.8 USM (not the L, I simply can't justify the extra cost just for IS) on both full frame and crop. It's a lot more handholdable, faster focusing, more "dual purpose".




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lensmen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,563 posts
Joined Oct 2004
     
Mar 10, 2013 21:43 |  #4

amfoto1 wrote in post #15695446 (external link)
Stop pixel peeping and just keep the lens that's the most useful to you...

bw!bw!bw!

For even sharper images, perhaps a Leica or Carl Zeiss macro will fit the bill. but not my wallet.


Jimmy
Just my 2 frame's worth :D:D:D
My Gear List
500px album (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tri911
Member
184 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Dallas Texas
     
Mar 11, 2013 01:10 |  #5

Sigma 150mm is an excellent lense as well:)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
titi_67207
Senior Member
Avatar
496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Strasbourg, France
     
Mar 11, 2013 05:36 |  #6

tri911 wrote in post #15700958 (external link)
Sigma 150mm is an excellent lense as well:)

+1 for the Siggy 150mm even in old version!

Titi


Canon 5D MkII + Sony A7 + 24x36 & 6x6 B&W film cameras .
CV 15 4.5 III | TS-E 24L II | FE 28 2 | (50+85) 1.4 | 135 2 | 70-200 4.0L | a collection of old Zuikos + FD + Adaptall + AI-s + M42

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 540
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Mar 11, 2013 08:40 |  #7

I owned the 180L for a short time, and I found it slow to focus (when it had to hunt through the whole range) and heavy... it was great at being a macro lens, not so good at being anything else...


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nima12330
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Mar 14, 2013 18:09 |  #8

I owned the 180L for a short time, and I found it slow to focus (when it had to hunt through the whole range) and heavy... it was great at being a macro lens, not so good at being anything else...

i'm agree with you about focus and weight ! i believe that this lens in only for macro photography and in macro work you need to use manual focus but 100mm L can be a good portrait lens with better focus time and weight in compare with 180mm
thank you all to answer my question i decided to keep both lens ...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,725 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
canon 180mm L or 100mm L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Bella toye
1185 guests, 181 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.