Stop pixel peeping and just keep the lens that's the most useful to you...
I don't see the advantage of the 100mm, anyway, looking at your sample shots. Both look very sharp.
Or keep both... they serve different purposes.
I have both (along with a couple other macro lenses).
On a crop camera, 180mm is a very long macro lens... more difficult to hold steady, which is just compounded when you need to stop it down more to get any depth of field at all. I mostly use the 180mm on a full frame camera.
The difference in sharpness you think you are seeing might just be camera shake causing slight image softness, more-so with the 180mm since it's so much harder to keep rock steady. Even the slap of the mirror in the camera can cause enough vibration to effect images shot with the 180mm at high magnification.
I use my 100/2.8 USM (not the L, I simply can't justify the extra cost just for IS) on both full frame and crop. It's a lot more handholdable, faster focusing, more "dual purpose".