-= 6D Owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos!

would this sensor work in the 5D3? WOW these pics are fine!

Home for spring break hanging out with the old gang in the Walmart parking lot brings back memories.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i811.photobucke​t.com …/IMG_1869_zps4c​8e238d.jpg

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER. Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries. Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page. http://i811.photobucke​t.com …/IMG_1890_zps18​ac7723.jpg

jocau wrote in post #15707023
Next time, if only one person is "in focus", please choose the girl.

+1

jocau wrote in post #15707023
Next time, if only one person is "in focus", please choose the girl.

LOL!!!
OK, will remember that

Picking up one of these tomorrow to add to my mark II and 7d! Can't wait!!

JimmyJam wrote in post #15705763
I went up to the USS New Jersey ship museum this weekend, and despite screwing with my WB shift and forgetting to reset to neutral, got a bunch of decent shots - thank goodness for raw, and DxO. Here are a few interiors that show some of the no-flash low light capability.

Inside a 5-inch gun turret:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/23339109@N07/8​550540849/
Onboard the USS New Jersey by Jimbo in Jersey, on Flickr

Passageway, with about 10w fluorescents overhead.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/23339109@N07/8​550538857/
Onboard the USS New Jersey by Jimbo in Jersey, on Flickr

Nice. I like the WB on these.

scpictaker wrote in post #15708436
would this sensor work in the 5D3? WOW these pics are fine!

I believe the sensors in the two are very similar - IQ between them is pretty much indistinguishable, with the 6D only pulling slightly ahead at very high ISO, from what I've read.

trying out some full tank shots of my frog tank. I don't know if this camera produces images with a much better dynamic range than my 40D or if I'm just getting better at editing them, but these turned out way better than I could achieve before I upgraded.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/jasonwithers/8​552395471/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/jasonwithers/8​552438855/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/jasonwithers/8​552439203/

start at page one and knock your self out!

Hi all,

I will probably pull the trigger on the 6D and 24-105 f4L. I was wondering about SD cards and haven't been able to find information regarding the speed.

I have a couple of Classe 4 15MB/s cards but I think they will be very slow. I shoot RAW and rarely use continuous drive (but I'd like to be able to do so for a dozen of shots in a row).

Would a class 10 30MB/s or 45MB/s be ok for my use?

Thanks for your input,

jeremietard

A few post back, someone talked about this. I think it was the page or two back

jeremietard wrote in post #15710316
Hi all,

I will probably pull the trigger on the 6D and 24-105 f4L. I was wondering about SD cards and haven't been able to find information regarding the speed.

I have a couple of Classe 4 15MB/s cards but I think they will be very slow. I shoot RAW and rarely use continuous drive (but I'd like to be able to do so for a dozen of shots in a row).

Would a class 10 30MB/s or 45MB/s be ok for my use?

Thanks for your input,

jeremietard

I have a few SanDisk 16GB class 10 45MB/s and they keep up with it.

AlexTakesPhotos wrote in post #15710349
I have a few SanDisk 16GB class 10 45MB/s and they keep up with it.

Thanks! Good news I won't need to buy a more expensive 95MB/s

M_Six wrote in post #15706857
Just a quick note to 6D users. I have been disappointed with the buffer in my 6D when I was shooting birds in continuous mode. I was using a 30MB/s SanDisk Ultra SD card. The buffer would fill at about 17 shots and then freeze. I could maybe squeeze off another shot after 5 or more seconds. The buffer took 35 long seconds to clear completely. I was bummed because I really wanted to be able to use this camera for birding and motor sports. I did some reading about SD card speeds and how they can affect camera buffer write speed, but all I found were conflicting anecdotes about how effective that is or I found really old test data.

So I bought a SanDisk 32GB UHS-I (95MB/s) card to test for myself. The difference is astounding. With the new 95MB/s card, it runs to 25 images before slowing to about 1 FPS (maybe a bit slower). But it keeps on shooting. The buffer clears completely in less than 10 seconds. I'd call that a significant difference. I'm psyched because this means I can use this body for birding and motor sports after all.

Here it is

Luta13 wrote in post #15708428
Thanks for the compliments on last Supercross shot gang. Here is another:

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Take Off by Luta13, on Flickr"]http://www.flickr.com/​photos/luta_foto/85524​53063/ Take Off by Luta13, on Flickr

What kind of PP did you do on these? I really like them but my eyes keep fooling me to think there is a slight ghosting around the bike and rider making it look almost 3d, very cool shots!