Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 30 Apr 2013 (Tuesday) 11:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Show Star Not Happy

 
forbiggs
Senior Member
Avatar
397 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: South SF Bay Area
     
Apr 30, 2013 11:43 |  #1

I did the headshots for the Funny Girl cast. However, the star of the show is appalled at how she looks. "My mouth is too big, I look like a horse. And my face looks too fat." What studio tricks (or photoshop) can I do to help her out? :confused: Below are the raw, unedited photos.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/04/5/LQ_647219.jpg
Image hosted by forum (647219) © forbiggs [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/04/5/LQ_647220.jpg
Image hosted by forum (647220) © forbiggs [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon EOS 7D, 580EX, 2 Photoflex light domes, 4-STUDIMAX III 320ws AC/DC strobes, half dome reflector; Tamron 28-75, f2.8; Tokina 11-16, f2.8; Canon 55-250, f4-5.6; Canon 70-200, f2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PapaGary
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Toe-puke-ah, Kansas
     
Apr 30, 2013 15:01 |  #2

Have her smile with her lips closed instead of grin. It should accomplish both goals.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toolman21
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Memphis
     
Apr 30, 2013 16:11 |  #3

The photos weren't taken with a wide angle, they seem well balanced and she looks fine. I think perhaps she has some self-conscious issues that you might not be able to work around. Good job on the photo though, esp for un-edited


Toolman21 - Canon 60d & T1i (sold) - Canon 17-55 | Canon 17-85 | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 55-250
My Flicker (external link) | Like me on Facebook to follow my He-Man 365 nonsense (external link)| www.heman365.com (external link)https://www.facebook.c​om …n-Digital/34796106523515​2 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
koala ­ yummies
Senior Member
736 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 203
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
     
Apr 30, 2013 19:23 |  #4

forbiggs wrote in post #15882929 (external link)
(or photoshop) can I do to help her out?

Photoshop liquify tool/filter (google for hundreds of tutorials). It's what the pros do :p The go-to digital weight-loss brush.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 01, 2013 12:49 |  #5

One of the portraiture tools such as Portrait Professional. Go easy on the skin smoothing tools though, it's very easy to overdo it with those. Just do a small amount of reshaping. Unless you're skilled and experienced, those tools will likely do it faster and cleaner than you'll be able to with liquify/warp in Photoshop.

I very, very rarely do any adjustments to facial structure, but a few months ago I had a client that required it. It was one of those medspa-salons where they do botox and face peels and body wraps and stuff.. they were so critical of their own portraits. "I look so fat, look at my horrible dimples, look at my jowls, I hate the way I look in pictures." I figured, they're in the business of fabricating artificial beauty, so I had to set aside my qualms about using software trickery on portraits.

I used a tiny amount of the face-slimming and neck-lengthening tools, and those seemed to do the trick. I turned off all the other features like the skin smoothing and teeth whitening; those usually go too over-the-top for my taste and style.

Alternative 1) Perhaps short-lighting or broad-lighting would have made a difference, instead of the almost-flat wrap lighting that you used. Since she's worried about the width of her cheeks, maybe short-lighting would have worked.

Alternative 2) I often like to go through a range of facial expressions. Big smile, gentle smile, Mona Lisa smile, completely neutral, wide eyes. If the mood permits, throw in a few fun and wacky ones, like an exaggerated wink, a big surprise face with "O" mouth, a toothy snarl, a pout, etc.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
equach206
Senior Member
Avatar
307 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
     
May 05, 2013 23:58 |  #6

nathancarter wrote in post #15887074 (external link)
Alternative 1) Perhaps short-lighting or broad-lighting would have made a difference, instead of the almost-flat wrap lighting that you used. Since she's worried about the width of her cheeks, maybe short-lighting would have worked.

I second this. Looking at the catch lights in her eyes, it looks like 2 equal light sources on either side. Try having her turn slightly and light from an angle on one side so that the shadow opposite the light will cause a slimming effect.


5D | 50D | 60 f/2.8 Macro | 85 f/1.8 | 17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/2.8L | 430EX
Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
May 07, 2013 08:23 |  #7

It amazes me when people complain about a perceived flaw (my mouth is too big) and then they show up with bright red lipstick and flash a chesire cat grin that exaggerates the very thing they don't like. I see it all the time, they show up with a sleeveless top and then tell me how much they hate their fat arms and can I make it so their arms don't show. You did a good job with the photos, her reaction might have been better if she hadn't seen unedited versions? Maybe?


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whuband
Goldmember
Avatar
1,433 posts
Likes: 84
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
     
May 07, 2013 10:28 as a reply to  @ suecassidy's post |  #8

Exactly Sue. LOL


1D4, 6D, 7D2, Sony a6000 with Sony16-70, Rokinon 12mmf2, Canon lenses: 17-40L, 17-55 f2.8, 10-22, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 70-200mm IS 2.8, 300mm 2.8 IS, 580EXII (3), 430EX, Alien Bees.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 10, 2013 13:27 |  #9

koala yummies wrote in post #15884612 (external link)
Photoshop liquify tool/filter (google for hundreds of tutorials). It's what the pros do :p The go-to digital weight-loss brush.

this^^^ and shop in some more pronounced catch lights too.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14868
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 10, 2013 13:29 |  #10

Re shoot. Going back with a digital fix of photos she's already seen is unlikely to impress her.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
Avatar
3,607 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 839
Joined Dec 2009
Location: 604
     
May 17, 2013 12:54 |  #11

nathancarter wrote in post #15887074 (external link)
Alternative 1) Perhaps short-lighting or broad-lighting would have made a difference, instead of the almost-flat wrap lighting that you used. Since she's worried about the width of her cheeks, maybe short-lighting would have worked.

Alternative 2) I often like to go through a range of facial expressions. Big smile, gentle smile, Mona Lisa smile, completely neutral, wide eyes. If the mood permits, throw in a few fun and wacky ones, like an exaggerated wink, a big surprise face with "O" mouth, a toothy snarl, a pout, etc.

This. I think she'll like the results better with a reshoot. Lighting to slim her face will definitely help.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,610 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Show Star Not Happy
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1481 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.