Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 May 2013 (Sunday) 23:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Quick flash gun and brolly question

 
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
May 12, 2013 23:53 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Heya,

When you guys set up your umbrellas, what's usually your zoom value for the flash gun? Is it more efficient to zoom out (even with the wide angle diffuser) or to zoom in?


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whortleberry
Goldmember
Avatar
1,719 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
May 13, 2013 04:00 |  #2

Two things to consider here. Firstly, with the flash zoom at a fixed position, you need to think about the distance the head is from the umbrella surface.
http://www.flickr.com …in/set-72157630310760782/ (external link)
Then, with the head in a fixed position on the umbrella shaft, you need to consider zoom setting.
http://www.flickr.com …in/set-72157630310760782/ (external link)
It's all down to individual experimenting but the imporant thing is to only change one item at once. If you're changing the position on the shaft then keep the zoom setting fixed - conversely, if you're changing the zoom setting then keep the flash head in one place. Otherwise, you'll just add further confusion.

These sketches were prepared for another purpose altogether, but I hope they'll suffice to at least steer you in the right direction.

BTW, don't change the umbrella to subject distance - adding a third variable will make things impossible to tie down to a working solution. And leave the brave horseman out of the equation too :D


Phil ǁ Kershaw Soho Reflex: 4¼" Ross Xpres, 6½" Aldis, Super XX/ABC Pyro in 24 DDS, HP3/Meritol Metol in RFH, Johnson 'Scales' brand flash powder. Kodak Duo Six-20/Verichrome Pan. Other odd bits over the decades, simply to get the job done - not merely to polish and brag about cos I'm too mean to buy the polish!
FlickR (external link) ◄► "The Other Yongnuo User Guide v4.12" by Clive Bolton (external link) ◄► UK Railway Photographs 1906-79 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
May 13, 2013 12:38 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks for the reply. Cool diagrams.

Looking at this one (external link) you have there, I'm suddenly reminded of what triggered this question in the first place: my flash head is not dead centre.

IMAGE: http://www.diamantstudios.ca/Ablage/Bild/Examples/FG_straight_on.jpg

It can be tilted, but only by -7 degrees, and you can see that the beam doesn't hit right in the centre even then:

IMAGE: http://www.diamantstudios.ca/Ablage/Bild/Examples/FG_tilted_105.jpg

Side question: what if you use diffusers to simulate bare bulb with brollies? It seems to me that the light fills the umbrella more with it than without it:

IMAGE: http://www.diamantstudios.ca/Ablage/Bild/Examples/FG_tilted_stofen.jpg

But, of course, you'd lose intensity.

'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whortleberry
Goldmember
Avatar
1,719 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
May 13, 2013 16:34 |  #4

Referring back to http://www.flickr.com …in/set-72157630310760782/ (external link) and relating this to your images, it appears that you have the flash positioned at point C. Try backing the umbrella surface further away from the flash head and you will find that the spread of light can actually be controlled with the zoom reflector to more or less fill the umbrella surface. Basically, try the umbrella shaft only just inserted into the flash holder so that it's as far away as possible.

The problem with using a diffuser cap (Stofen or similar) is, as you say, the loss of intensity. You would also find that you lose control of the beam from the umbrella because the diffuser just spews light uncontrollably in all directions. You'll get completely different quality of lighting because a lot of the output would be reflected from areas outside the umbrella canopy. If you were to use this arrangement outdoors, you'd rapidly run out of power because of the wasted light

The offset can be cured by a simple bracket like this (external link). Doesn't need to be pretty and you may like to put a strap of some sort round flash head and bracket (a hair band or 'scrunchy' works fine) to make it even steadier. Flash fits on like this (external link) (please ignore the DIY honeycomb, again this image was taken for a totally different topic) and places the flash tube as close to the axis as you can get. This easily gets round the triangle formation you have at present. Just a bent piece of aluminium bolted to a cheap 'E'-type umbrella flash mount in place of the cold shoe - a couple of 4mm stainless bolts in place of the original countersunk ones did the job. The other bent bit is simply somewhere to bolt a Pixel TD-381 power pack on those occasions when my Godox PB960 is in use elsewhere.


Phil ǁ Kershaw Soho Reflex: 4¼" Ross Xpres, 6½" Aldis, Super XX/ABC Pyro in 24 DDS, HP3/Meritol Metol in RFH, Johnson 'Scales' brand flash powder. Kodak Duo Six-20/Verichrome Pan. Other odd bits over the decades, simply to get the job done - not merely to polish and brag about cos I'm too mean to buy the polish!
FlickR (external link) ◄► "The Other Yongnuo User Guide v4.12" by Clive Bolton (external link) ◄► UK Railway Photographs 1906-79 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexam
Member
Avatar
67 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Hollywood, Nr Birmingham, UK
     
May 14, 2013 01:48 |  #5

You could also consider that some softboxes are supplied with a bracket to lower the flash to a central position. The box can also be turned in positions to allow a lower downturn, like the Micansu Ezy-Up Softbox


Serious about Photography - Alexam Images and APA - Associated Photographic Alliance
Visit my profiles on TFP Models & Malcolm Alexander - Star Now

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Alveric.
     
May 14, 2013 13:43 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Well, it definitely wasn't pretty, LOL. I'll see if I can get a better piece of aluminium.

IMAGE: http://www.diamantstudios.ca/Ablage/Bild/Examples/HM_bracket.jpg

It seems that when using the cover, I don't have much choice in terms of placement along the shaft, especially if I want to remove the bottom part of it. But, when using it coverless... which brings up a side question: what about parabollic brollies? Can they be really efficiently used with speed lights? I bought mine to use for group shots, but it seems that the beam is even more collimated with these big things than with the normal umbrellas. Maybe it's time I really bought a monolight.

IMAGE: http://www.diamantstudios.ca/Ablage/Bild/Examples/Parabollic.jpg
I was trying to set it at 'Position A' in the pic above.

'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,871 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Quick flash gun and brolly question
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is rickldewitt
1328 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.