Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 May 2013 (Tuesday) 10:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Good in-body NR algorithms: how difficult is it?

 
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,624 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
May 21, 2013 10:11 |  #1

We all know Canon sets their in-camera NR to very strong settings, smearing quite a bit of detail. Even when it is turned off completely, there is some smearing going on.
On the other hand, latest bodies are real computer powerhouses: the 5D3 can even do in-body HDR and blending modes!
How difficult is it for Canon to implement REALLY good noise reduction as we see in third party produtcs that can actually reduce noise AND preserve fine detail?

I am always quite surprised by the results I get from Noise Ninja, Topaz and Nik products. I wonder how much better it could be if I didn't have a smeared image to start with...


Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 21, 2013 10:42 |  #2

Would be nice if Magic Lantern let you do this.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,893 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10062
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 21, 2013 10:49 |  #3

I may be behind the times, but in my experience the only good noise reduction occurs when a mask is applied to protect details, and when the NR being is applied is tailored to the specific image and the specific type of noise.

With that in mind, I can not foresee a way to have in camera NR that is even remotely as effective as the methods I would suggest people use in software.

This is just one of the many reasons I shoot RAW.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1ds4Me
Member
230 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 21, 2013 10:53 |  #4

Alex_Venom wrote in post #15953011 (external link)
We all know Canon sets their in-camera NR to very strong settings, smearing quite a bit of detail. Even when it is turned off completely, there is some smearing going on.
On the other hand, latest bodies are real computer powerhouses: the 5D3 can even do in-body HDR and blending modes!
How difficult is it for Canon to implement REALLY good noise reduction as we see in third party produtcs that can actually reduce noise AND preserve fine detail?

I am always quite surprised by the results I get from Noise Ninja, Topaz and Nik products. I wonder how much better it could be if I didn't have a smeared image to start with...

Any PP you apply on the computer has the benefit of a higher level CPU and better RAM, etc. Also, you can turn NR off in camera to avoid smeared files or shoot RAW.
What I'd like is Canon to apply Noise Ninja kind of algorithms in their Digital Solutions Software.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

912 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Good in-body NR algorithms: how difficult is it?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is rickldewitt
1448 guests, 185 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.