Birdwatcher86 wrote in post #16005725
The ones I listed yes.
Most all the others were the 100-400mm.
And please state your thoughts if you have some, sounds like you might?
I am trying things myself right now. 70-200 f/2.8 MkII + 1.4x and 2.0x MkIII TC's versus 100-400 and one of my ideas was to add the 400/5.6 later on and selling the 100-400. I got to all this due to the very disappointing 200-400 price tag. Even with a 8K rebate (haha) it will be out of my reach. The 100-400 is a fine piece of glass, but from my shots last weekend with the 70-200+2x, I was stunned....AF speed on par and the quality is pretty darn close also. IS on that combo is better and heavier, but the 70-200 at 2.8 is just awesome.. I know I will have to make a decision, because I don't see me running around with both. The FL overlap is just to great. So I looked at the prime and the only thing that makes me less comfy with it is the lack of IS. Decisions, decisions, decisions....