Upgrading now
DamianOz Senior Member 696 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jun 12, 2013 03:12 | #91 Upgrading now Bodies - Canon EOS 5DIII | EOS 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lsquare Goldmember 1,933 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jun 12, 2013 03:15 | #92 I'm really interested in the Upright feature of LR5. Obviously parts of the image will be cropped out. How much extra space should I give to a photo so that after using Upright, I'll still have most of the important parts of the image intact rather than cropped out?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DamianOz Senior Member 696 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jun 12, 2013 03:44 | #93 lsquare wrote in post #16022973  I'm really interested in the Upright feature of LR5. Obviously parts of the image will be cropped out. How much extra space should I give to a photo so that after using Upright, I'll still have most of the important parts of the image intact rather than cropped out? How long is a piece of string? Bodies - Canon EOS 5DIII | EOS 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigBadWolfie Senior Member 268 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | How's the healing brush compared to CS6's?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MCAsan Goldmember  3,905 posts Likes: 84 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Atlanta More info | Jun 12, 2013 07:18 | #95 After upgrading yesterday wihout problem, this morning I removed the LR 4 app, backups, and catalog and got back over 30GB on my rMBP SSD. If you delete LR4 remember to one day remove the backups and catalog files.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hwan Member 153 posts Joined Dec 2012 Location: St Louis, MO More info | Jun 12, 2013 11:29 | #96 Anyone find that the thumbnail generation during import is very slow in LR5? With LR4, the thumbnails load very quickly, but with LR5, I have to wait a while (~8 seconds) before the thumbnails show up. I'm importing raw only images. Olympus E-M1 | 12-40mm f2.8 | 17mm f1.8 | 75mm f1.8 | GT1544T + Q3T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Preeb Goldmember  More info | Images exported at less than 1/3 original size may have NR and output sharpening removed. There are also some bugs with the Publish services which may result in original images being deleted from your hard drive. That is straight from Adobe. Those bugs are significant enough for me to wait. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark-B Goldmember  2,248 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Louisiana More info | Jun 12, 2013 13:13 | #98 lsquare wrote in post #16022973 I'm really interested in the Upright feature of LR5. Obviously parts of the image will be cropped out. How much extra space should I give to a photo so that after using Upright, I'll still have most of the important parts of the image intact rather than cropped out? Do you not use the lens correction tool in LR4? It's the same thing, but LR5 just takes it's best guess at doing an automatic correction. I've found it to be good enough about 20% of the time on non-architecture shots and about 10% of the time on architecture shots. I still end up using the manual corrections anyway. Mark-B
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark-B Goldmember 2,248 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Louisiana More info | Jun 12, 2013 13:14 | #99 BigBadWolfie wrote in post #16023193 How's the healing brush compared to CS6's? Slow with no precise control, and very resource intensive. If you have a lot to do, you're still better off with Photoshop. Mark-B
LOG IN TO REPLY |
squiLL Senior Member  667 posts Likes: 35 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Jun 12, 2013 16:18 | #100 Pretty impressive so far. Mike Cassara
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise "It takes a bit of work to get it in."  More info | Jun 12, 2013 16:23 | #101 Less trips to PS is very good news. Have yet to test it. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 12, 2013 16:55 | #102  Permanent banMark-B wrote in post #16024389 Do you not use the lens correction tool in LR4? It's the same thing, but LR5 just takes it's best guess at doing an automatic correction. I've found it to be good enough about 20% of the time on non-architecture shots and about 10% of the time on architecture shots. I still end up using the manual corrections anyway. yap, a lot of time its not even near right.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
carshop Goldmember  1,846 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Jun 12, 2013 17:59 | #103 I find LR5 faster. ShawnSmugmug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GeminiZ Member 179 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Jun 12, 2013 18:59 | #104 Looks like LR5 is my next choice for the studio. Just hate to have to do watched folder technique for tethered capture with my 6D. 7D, 400D - 24-70 f/2.8L - 70-200 f/2.8L - 50 f/1.2L - 40 f/2.8 - 10-22 f/3.5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is ArleeZarling 581 guests, 217 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
