Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 10 Oct 2006 (Tuesday) 15:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS USM

 
Jan ­ Jasinski
Goldmember
Avatar
2,976 posts
Likes: 413
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jun 07, 2013 18:04 |  #2941

Great shot! I always find it interesting to see what the birds get in their beeks.


5D IV | 6D | 16-35L | 35 f/2.0 | 100-400L II | 1.4x III | 15 f/2.8
photojan.ca (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Lesmore
Senior Member
874 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Jun 07, 2013 20:41 |  #2942

Candor wrote in post #16007135 (external link)
Bringing this thread back from the dead with a recent shot.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.mikeswildli​fe.com …808166&k=8SBjc8​T&lb=1&s=A  (external link)

Nice looking Common Snapping Turtle. Wise indeed to use a 500mm lens on this denizen of the deep. They can move surprisingly quickly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 124
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jun 18, 2013 02:22 |  #2943

Time to wake this thread back up...

IMAGE: http://crosswindimages.com/img/s9/v91/p1710357835-4.jpg

Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
larshkj
Member
195 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Near Oslo, Norway
     
Jun 18, 2013 03:08 |  #2944

Here are a few model jets.
I'm actually not very impressed of the sharpness of my copy. My 100-400 is sharper than the 500, even when the focus hits it's target. It's at Canon now for a check up.

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3678/8997858620_7d79078158_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/larshkj/8997858​620/  (external link)
DT0A7940 (external link) by larshkj (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2851/8997856830_a12ef3d505_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/larshkj/8997856​830/  (external link)
DT0A8011 (external link) by larshkj (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8553/8996655423_1df49d5be4_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/larshkj/8996655​423/  (external link)
DT0A8592 (external link) by larshkj (external link), on Flickr


Lars



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 124
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jun 18, 2013 03:12 |  #2945

You're joking, yes?

Those are all tack sharp (and very impressive models to boot)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
larshkj
Member
195 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 492
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Near Oslo, Norway
     
Jun 18, 2013 03:18 |  #2946

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #16041283 (external link)
You're joking, yes?

Those are all tack sharp (and very impressive models to boot)

Nope, not joking :)
Those are 1024 pixels long side. Look at them at 100%, and they are not as sharp as the ones @ 400 mm from my 100-400.
I expect Canon to look at the lens today. Absolute sharpness aside, the image quality from this lens is amazing!

BTW. I may have a very sharp version of the 100-400. Anybody else who has both and have compared the two?
Yes these are impressive models! The 3 models above are high end model jets.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 124
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jun 18, 2013 03:45 |  #2947

I have both lenses and my 500 makes my 100-400 look like crap...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hollywood1053
Senior Member
370 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Austin
     
Jun 18, 2013 08:15 |  #2948

Jay - do you have a MKI or MKII 500?


6D | 70D | 70-200 f4L IS | Σ 50 f1.4 | 17-50 2.8 | 1.4 TC II
My Flikr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,685 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 6627
Joined Aug 2010
Location: West Point, Georgia
     
Jun 18, 2013 08:57 |  #2949

larshkj wrote in post #16041278 (external link)
Here are a few model jets.
I'm actually not very impressed of the sharpness of my copy. My 100-400 is sharper than the 500, even when the focus hits it's target. It's at Canon now for a check up.

Lars

I'm not getting off to a great start with my new-to-me 500 either...FedEx seems to have misplaced it. I don't know how sharp my 500 will be, but FedEx isn't looking very sharp at this point. Grrr.

Lars, your photos look great to me.

Hollywood1053 wrote in post #16041700 (external link)
Jay - do you have a MKI or MKII 500?

No need to ask: This is the EF 500mm f/4L IS USM (version I) thread; there is a separate lens thread for the EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM: https://photography-on-the.net …?t=922581&highl​ight=500mm Any image you see posted in this thread is (should be) from the version 1. :)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony α7R II | CV 12mm, Loxia 21mm, Loxia 35mm, FE 35mm F1.4, Batis 85mm, Batis 135mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott_online
Senior Member
360 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 907
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jun 18, 2013 11:01 as a reply to  @ post 16007984 |  #2950

I was kind of hoping there would be a brown bear in this shot, but this is all I've got to show for three 14hr nights in a hide. Those are some big spiders' webs. (Of course the night after I left, two bears, two wolverines, five wolves and a lynx showed up...:rolleyes:)

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7453/9070858158_5535be07c4_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/scottgrubb/9070​858158/  (external link)
2013-06-09 01-47-41 (external link) by Scott Grubb (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,629 posts
Gallery: 204 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4018
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 18, 2013 15:20 |  #2951

larshkj wrote in post #16041292 (external link)
Nope, not joking :)
Those are 1024 pixels long side. Look at them at 100%, and they are not as sharp as the ones @ 400 mm from my 100-400.
I expect Canon to look at the lens today. Absolute sharpness aside, the image quality from this lens is amazing!

BTW. I may have a very sharp version of the 100-400. Anybody else who has both and have compared the two?
Yes these are impressive models! The 3 models above are high end model jets.

I have both the 100-400 and the the 500. The 500 is considerably sharper than the 100-400 with my 1D Mk IV and Mk II. My 100-400 is what I consider to be a sharp copy but the 500 beats it. Have you micro adjusted your 500 and camera? My sharpness improved quite a bit after micro adjustment.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,629 posts
Gallery: 204 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4018
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 18, 2013 15:34 as a reply to  @ Nighthound's post |  #2952

Nice to see this thread revived, thanks Jay. Great shots everyone.

Here's a few from this spring.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i3.photobucket.​com …sprey12bmark.jp​g~original (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i3.photobucket.​com …3Osprey6mark.jp​g~original (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i3.photobucket.​com …rosprey9mark.jp​g~original (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i3.photobucket.​com …EagleOwlmark.jp​g~original (external link)

Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scermat
Senior Member
Avatar
295 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 131
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Malta, Zabbar
     
Jun 18, 2013 17:21 |  #2953

larshkj wrote in post #16041292 (external link)
Nope, not joking :)
Those are 1024 pixels long side. Look at them at 100%, and they are not as sharp as the ones @ 400 mm from my 100-400.
I expect Canon to look at the lens today. Absolute sharpness aside, the image quality from this lens is amazing!

BTW. I may have a very sharp version of the 100-400. Anybody else who has both and have compared the two?
Yes these are impressive models! The 3 models above are high end model jets.

Like the good majority, my 500 eats my 100-400 for breakfast when it comes to sharpness.

I did find it a bit awkward to get used to at first though and initially focus was a bit hit and miss.

One thing I noticed was that while on the 100-400 I used to leave the stabilizer on and always get very good results even if I was shooting moving subjects. I know you're not supposed to do this, but it was one of those things that I found worked quite well for me. On the 500mm in similar scenarios though, I absolutely had to switch it off as results were a significantly poorer than what I was getting on the 100-400.

Playing with the camera's focus settings also increased my sharpness (particularly when tracking moving subjects). I also noticed that at 500mm Heat haze also has a significantly bigger effect than I expected when compared to my 100-400.

Lovely shots, by the way.


Canon EOS 1DX Mk II + Canon EOS 1D Mk IV + 24-105mm f4L IS + 50mm f1.8 + 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS + 70-200mm f2.8L IS + 500mm f4L IS
http://www.matthewscer​ri.com/wildlife (external link) - http://www.matthewscer​ri.com (external link) - https://500px.com/matt​hewscerriwildlife (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hollywood1053
Senior Member
370 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Austin
     
Jun 18, 2013 17:41 |  #2954

Nighthound wrote in post #16042953 (external link)
Nice to see this thread revived, thanks Jay. Great shots everyone.

Here's a few from this spring.

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

These are awesome...


6D | 70D | 70-200 f4L IS | Σ 50 f1.4 | 17-50 2.8 | 1.4 TC II
My Flikr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Weja
Senior Member
Avatar
679 posts
Gallery: 407 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 10957
Joined May 2011
Location: The netherlands
     
Jun 23, 2013 03:41 |  #2955

@ Steve Ellwood
Amazing pictures.

I've used this lens on a 7D and nowadays on a 1D markIV.
Once I've done some micro adjustments this lens really increased it's sharpness.
The red on the head looks almost 3D.
Awesome lens.

IMAGE: http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/w372/janwever/IMG_26944-2_zpse3015402.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s1072.photobuck​et.com …44-2_zpse3015402.jpg.html  (external link)

Canon gear::arrow: 1DX , 5D IV, 600mm. F4 L IS II ,100/400 L IS II, 1.4 Tc.III , 2.0 Tc. III,
Gitzo 5541 LS with Wimberley head II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

912,130 views & 1,660 likes for this thread
Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is norm281049
820 guests, 406 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.