I noticed the same thing Bakewell... not even brushing, just moving my mouse. It's being noticed. http://forums.adobe.com/message/5423606
BobbyMartin Senior Member ![]() More info | Jun 23, 2013 22:26 | #181 I noticed the same thing Bakewell... not even brushing, just moving my mouse. It's being noticed. http://forums.adobe.com/message/5423606 Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 5DII | 580ex II | Canon 16-35 f/2.8 MKII L | Canon 24-70 MKII f/2.8 L | Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS MKII L | Canon 100-400 f/4.0-5.6 L | Canon 50 f/1.4 | Canon 85 f/1.8 | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jun 23, 2013 23:19 | #182 Bakewell wrote in post #16058544 ![]() I've just experienced an extreme slow down with an extended use of the adjustment brush on two different powerful computers. Totally different configurations that functioned fine with LR 4.4. Wow....the two totally different systems are just crawling! BobbyMartin wrote in post #16058873 ![]() I noticed the same thing Bakewell... not even brushing, just moving my mouse. It's being noticed. http://forums.adobe.com/message/5423606 ![]() The new Spot Removal Tool brush that your link points to a discussion about is really slow. It's also not that great a tool if you are used to using the content aware spot healing brush in PS. I honestly feel it's only good for very minor edits and I'm betting that there isn't much Adobe can do to make it any faster. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lsquare Goldmember 1,933 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jun 24, 2013 06:29 | #184 Bob_A wrote in post #16059000 ![]() The new Spot Removal Tool brush that your link points to a discussion about is really slow. It's also not that great a tool if you are used to using the content aware spot healing brush in PS. I honestly feel it's only good for very minor edits and I'm betting that there isn't much Adobe can do to make it any faster. I haven't seen any slowness with the Adjustment Brush tool though. It seems identical to LR4. Why do you say that?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bakewell Goldmember 1,385 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Irvine, CA More info | Jun 24, 2013 09:08 | #185 ![]() Bob_A wrote in post #16059000 ![]() The new Spot Removal Tool brush that your link points to a discussion about is really slow. It's also not that great a tool if you are used to using the content aware spot healing brush in PS. I honestly feel it's only good for very minor edits and I'm betting that there isn't much Adobe can do to make it any faster. I haven't seen any slowness with the Adjustment Brush tool though. It seems identical to LR4. I'm talking about the adjustment brush not the spot removal tool. Bluring background, adjusting exposure, etc. Had zero issues in LR 4.4. The actual brush use is crawling in LR 5. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jun 24, 2013 19:46 | #186 Bakewell wrote in post #16059889 ![]() I'm talking about the adjustment brush not the spot removal tool. Bluring background, adjusting exposure, etc. Had zero issues in LR 4.4. The actual brush use is crawling in LR 5.
Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jun 24, 2013 19:56 | #187 lsquare wrote in post #16059541 ![]() Why do you say that? My guess is that it's a large amount of data that has to be written and re-written to a record in a database, which in my opinion is going to be pretty slow. It's also probably why it isn't a content aware type of healing brush since that would likely require even more horsepower. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lsquare Goldmember 1,933 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jun 24, 2013 22:30 | #188 Bob_A wrote in post #16061609 ![]() My guess is that it's a large amount of data that has to be written and re-written to a record in a database, which in my opinion is going to be pretty slow. It's also probably why it isn't a content aware type of healing brush since that would likely require even more horsepower. Adobe would have been better off not implementing the feature. What makes you think that faster SSDs in the future (PCI-E base) and more computing power and address those issues?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jun 25, 2013 00:23 | #189 lsquare wrote in post #16062018 ![]() What makes you think that faster SSDs in the future (PCI-E base) and more computing power and address those issues? Nope, I don't think they will, not in the short term anyway and not at a reasonable hardware cost for most users. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lsquare Goldmember 1,933 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jun 25, 2013 03:54 | #190 Bob_A wrote in post #16062238 ![]() Nope, I don't think they will, not in the short term anyway and not at a reasonable hardware cost for most users. ![]() The rest of the LR5 editing tools are fast enough on my hardware, which is all good. However, as per a previous post I made, doing massive amounts of metadata changes for some reason grinds my system to a halt. I also just found out that my i7 930 CPU goes to 100% (although RAM doesn't go over 5GB utilized) and really starts to cook, making LR unusable when I select multiple galleries to publish at the same time to Smugmug. Really weird, because it doesn't happen when I select one gallery at a time. I appreciate the debate and discussion in this thread over performance issues. It's been an informative exchange and in a few areas really eye opening. I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on that. I'm surprised that LR was able to push your CPU to 100% utilization. I haven't checked, but my i5 2500K at 4ghz runs Lightroom without any issues. I think once PCI-E base SSDs becomes cheaper and more prevalent, it's going to make Lightroom even better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Jun 25, 2013 08:32 | #191 lsquare wrote in post #16062514 ![]() I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on that. I'm surprised that LR was able to push your CPU to 100% utilization. I haven't checked, but my i5 2500K at 4ghz runs Lightroom without any issues. I think once PCI-E base SSDs becomes cheaper and more prevalent, it's going to make Lightroom even better. It only does it using Publish and queuing up a bunch of galleries to publish at the same time. Looks like a bug to me, in that Publish seems to want to do all of the operations in parallel instead of sequential. Manually selecting one gallery at a time doesn't cause full utilization of the CPU to occur and images upload faster. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ekinnyc Senior Member ![]() 784 posts Likes: 14 Joined Mar 2011 Location: New York, NY More info | Jun 25, 2013 20:52 | #192 what's the best way to convert my existing raw files to process version 2012? theyre all 2010 from lr3 6D| 35mm f/2 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BamPhoto Goldmember ![]() 3,155 posts Likes: 107 Joined Sep 2005 Location: AZ-USA More info | Jun 25, 2013 22:44 | #193 On a pc, select all, settings "Update to current Process" ekinnyc wrote in post #16065072 ![]() what's the best way to convert my existing raw files to process version 2012? theyre all 2010 from lr3 Randy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShootaBike Senior Member ![]() 337 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Ex land of the Gods - now land of the Poor! More info | Jun 26, 2013 03:00 | #194 I read earlier in this thread that one may "delete" stuff form the older version when an upgrade to LR5 is performed... Canon EOS 7D | Canon 580EX II | Metz Mecablitz 58 AF1 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM |Yongnuo YN-622C | Lots to learn...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yohan Pamudji Goldmember ![]() 2,994 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Mississippi More info | Jun 26, 2013 10:28 | #195 ekinnyc wrote in post #16065072 ![]() what's the best way to convert my existing raw files to process version 2012? theyre all 2010 from lr3 I would do it on a photo-by-photo basis as needed (when you want to make further tweaks to a given photo) instead of in bulk. There will be some differences in the rendering and you might not like how LR "translates" 2010 to 2012.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Janetc9 1003 guests, 327 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |