For action shots my 7D is my choice, even over my 5D MRKIII using the same lens. The 7D's focus tracking is excellent, and not to far out of reach cost wise for most people. Just my view of the 7D...
TJays Goldmember ![]() 1,320 posts Likes: 172 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Los Angeles USA More info | For action shots my 7D is my choice, even over my 5D MRKIII using the same lens. The 7D's focus tracking is excellent, and not to far out of reach cost wise for most people. Just my view of the 7D... Regards
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MotorPro Member 30 posts Joined Jun 2012 More info | As to the original question I think you answered it in the first sentance. "just started shooting","lack of experiance'. You have good equipment. If you want a new camera or lens great but don't expect them to fix the problem only time and practice will do that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Markd102 Senior Member ![]() More info | Jul 16, 2013 18:11 | #18 I cut my teeth shooting aussie football games on a manual camera with 400ISO B&W film...... then back to the office to process the film and develop the photos myself.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2013 03:15 | #19 Well, fact is you need to LEARN how to use the Autofocus system. Roland | Amateur Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2013 14:38 | #20 SkipD wrote in post #16124578 ![]() I used to photograph motor racing with my Nikon F cameras. These are film cameras and I did not have a motorized film advance. Auto focus did not exist in those days. I had absolutely no problem making a series of shots in rapid succession while advancing the film manually between shots AND changing the focus between shots while following the action with the camera. Every other sports photographer in the day had roughly the same type of equipment available and I don't recall a shortage of good sports photographs being published. In other words, I would not blame the camera for not being up to the job. ![]() I said in the beginning that some of the OOF shoots I get are due to my lack of experience, so all the "back in the day we shoot amazing photos with a disposable camera" is'nt really necessary 5D2, 24-70L F2.8, Sigma 85 F1.4, Sigma 50 F1.4, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400 F4.5-5.6 II, 430EX II X 2, A few Pocketwizards
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop ![]() 20,476 posts Likes: 161 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Jul 17, 2013 14:43 | #21 eyalha wrote in post #16128955 ![]() I said in the beginning that some of the OOF shoots I get are due to my lack of experience, so all the "back in the day we shoot amazing photos with a disposable camera" is'nt really necessary My Nikon F cameras (which I still have, by the way) are far from "disposable cameras". The point I was making is that they (and most other SLR cameras from the mid 1960s) are totally manually operated film cameras. The photographer using them has to choose the film (both type of film and ASA speed - similar to today's ISO values), advance the film manually for each frame, set the aperture and shutter speed based on a light meter and/or experience for exposure control, and manually focus the lens for each shot. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2013 14:56 | #22 I understand all of that, my dad is an events shooter and used the Nikon F cameras back in the day but now he got a 5d3 and it makes photographing EASIER 5D2, 24-70L F2.8, Sigma 85 F1.4, Sigma 50 F1.4, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400 F4.5-5.6 II, 430EX II X 2, A few Pocketwizards
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is DaveBama 900 guests, 217 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |